Started By
Message

Why our coaching model might work

Posted on 1/1/17 at 4:56 pm
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 4:56 pm
I didn't like the O hire but, let's take a look at why this might work.

We are paying serious coin for coordinators. Yes. I know that most places pay the top dog a ton and let it play out from there. And. If the top dog is a freak like that arse to our East, that's the correct model.

But. We've also seen many schools were the top dog really needed better coordinators.

Maybe if O can keep the recruiting train flowing, letting the coordinators do their thing will work.

Also. I don't think the title handed Aranda was just window dressing. Will be interesting to see.

Now look. I know that if this model works, it will be an exception. But, I do think we have stud coordinators. So. I'm cautiously optimistic. Certainly FAR more so than when the choice was initially made.
This post was edited on 1/1/17 at 4:58 pm
Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161244 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 4:57 pm to
It works as long as they can maintain coordinators... Issue is who they replace Aranda with when he leaves
Posted by DBU
Member since Mar 2014
19059 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 4:58 pm to
It's the same model Clemson has employed and it's working out well for them over the last few years. The difference being of course, Dabo didn't have a stint as a HC where he failed miserably before becoming the HC at Clemson.

I actually like the strategy, I just am not sold on whether we chose the right head guy to run it. Hopefully O proves me wrong.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 4:58 pm to
quote:

works as long as they can maintain coordinators... Issue is who they replace Aranda with when he leaves


Yep. A legit concern. You basically have to commit to always going big when replacing coordinators
Posted by tigerwith3
Mandeville
Member since Dec 2011
1386 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 5:01 pm to
LSU will be fine the next two years, but constantly hiring stud coordinators when ours leave will be quite a task.

We will always need two stud coordinators. Most quality head coaches only need one stud.

Will be difficult to maintain year after year.
Posted by Purple77
Member since Jan 2006
52 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 5:01 pm to
We will replace coordinators with the best available.
Posted by Marfa
Esplanade
Member since Sep 2016
1434 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 5:03 pm to
Aranda is more valuable than Orgeron.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 5:04 pm to
quote:

Aranda is more valuable than Orgeron.
I agree. Which makes things interesting.
Posted by SportTiger1
Stonewall, LA
Member since Feb 2007
28504 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 5:04 pm to
Maybe. Hope so.

But I will hold on to my doubts that the LSU admin is smart enough to figure out this formula, while no one else in college football had done it.
Posted by Jones
Member since Oct 2005
90504 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 5:05 pm to
So we are paying a guy almost 4 million to recruit and hope we have homerun hires for coordinators. It's risky because if we don't land the next Aranda, O won't be able to pick up the slack and we are screwed.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 5:05 pm to
quote:


But I will hold on to my doubts that the LSU admin is smart enough to figure out this formula, while no one else in college football had done it.
Dunno. As someone else mentioned. It's at least partially arguable that Clemson did exactly that
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
26752 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 5:07 pm to
How is this model any different than the model we already had?

Most successful programs have two stud coordinators now.

I don't think this is that significant. He will be successful or not, but we haven't done anything new here.
Posted by Phil2012
The planet
Member since Dec 2005
6213 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 5:08 pm to
Something tells me that CEO has learned much more than some folks on here want to give him credit for...I'll bet his binder is full of potential OCs, DCs, and position coaches... and will stay current going forward...I give him credit for having learned from each of the fine HCs he has worked with...and btw, many people, just like myself, have to learn the hard way,ie, through experience and hard knocks...it's not always fun that way, but it usually leaves a lasting impression when failure strikes...I for one learned more from my coaching losses than my wins...jmho
Posted by tigersbb
Member since Oct 2012
10297 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 5:08 pm to
quote:

Dabo didn't have a stint as a HC where he failed miserably before becoming the HC at Clemson.


Dabo did not have two stints as interim head coach at two high profile programs What was DAbos' interim record at Clemson?
Posted by DBU
Member since Mar 2014
19059 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

interim head coach


Experience as an actual HC means more than experience as an interim HC when it comes to determining whether a guy can run and sustain a program from the ground up
This post was edited on 1/1/17 at 5:11 pm
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

How is this model any different than the model we already had
I would argue that for the model to work, the HC has to be deferential to the coordinators so they can be their best.

Miles ego could NOT allow that.

As to most programs having two stud coordinators. Meh. All of Nick's DCs SEEM stud. Doesn't mean they actually are. Same for some offensive guru HCs.
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
12896 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 5:13 pm to
Can work for a short period of time, then naturally you'll lose those coordinators to bigger and better things. BUT, if it does work then you'll have an easier time on the next round getting the best and brightest coordinators because LSU then becomes THE ultimate stepping stone.

Replacing HC's vs. coordinators? I tend to think that replacing a HC usually requires replacing the coordinators anyway. So I don't forsee that being an issue.

ETA: Oh, and add LSU being the only CFB team to have a general manager to the equation as a new model. I find that aspect most interesting.
This post was edited on 1/1/17 at 5:15 pm
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
26752 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 5:15 pm to
I said most, so there are exceptions, but even many super hands-on coaches that used to call plays have passed on those duties these days.

Kiffin won't even call plays at FAU and plans to be a CEO type coach.

I wasn't a fan of the hire at all, but people act like Orgeron doesn't know anything about football.
Posted by Phil2012
The planet
Member since Dec 2005
6213 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 5:15 pm to
When a coach has NFL players at every position, the job gets a whole lot easier going forward...and many were rated #1 right out of high school, example,Cam Rob...sure Shorty is a good coach, but he wouldn't be half what some think he is without his superior recruiting method, whatever it is...
Posted by BayouBuster
Mathews, la.
Member since Aug 2009
490 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 5:22 pm to
Why our coaching model might workIt works as long as they can maintain coordinators... Issue is who they replace Aranda with when he leaves Wouldn't it be the same question that would need to be answered if Jimbo or Hermann came here?? Yes it would.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram