Started By
Message

re: Why can’t the NCAA just say, “these are the rules. If you don’t like it, then don’t play”

Posted on 9/4/26 at 9:16 am to
Posted by Pedropatterstine
Member since Aug 2026
596 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 9:16 am to
So spankum, you think we should just continue doing what we have been doing....let the SEC selectively enforce punishment against certain teams, but look the other way when certain other members break the rules?
Posted by Curtis Lowe
Member since Dec 2019
1765 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 9:25 am to
quote:

Why can’t the NCAA just say, “these are the rules. If you don’t like it, then don’t play”
King of New Orleans
Doesn’t seem hard. Have a spine. Say your rules. Tell anyone who thinks they can fight it just because they don’t like it to kick rocks.

At some point, someone has to make concrete NIL rules or this shite will rinse and repeat year after year.


First, the NCAA would need to construct and write rules that do not violate the various sections of the law.

Secondly, the NCAA would need to construct and write rules based on common sense and sound principles that do not violate the law.

Since, Oklahoma sued the NCAA over broadcasting rights in 1981, the NCAA has had a terrible time defending its rules in Courts of law against violations of the Sherman Anti-Trust laws.

This all is self-inflicted by the brilliant minds at the NCAA. Group think at its worst. No forward thinking and no defense to its stupidity. The Federal Courts have used the NCAA as a punching bag. It all well and good to say these are the rules deal with it, it is an entirely different situation when said rules are in violation of various sections of Federal and State law.

The present situation is the result of a bunch of eggheads (college presidents off all member institutions) voting on rule changes that adversely affect and discriminate against a subset of the athletes that fall under the rules.

Idea for a new slogan:

The NCAA effing it up since at least 1920.
Posted by BillyBobfan24_7
R.I.P. SGT Nelson
Member since May 2004
18723 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 9:29 am to
quote:

NCAA’s first step is to enforce their rules equally and fairly across all fronts. They have displayed time and time again not to do that.


Actually the first step would be to write rules that are clear and enforceable. Intentionally leaving grey areas leads to situations like this.
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 9:31 am
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
63829 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 9:32 am to
quote:

AI Overview

The landmark House v. NCAA antitrust settlement, approved in June 2025 by Judge Claudia Wilken, fundamentally reshapes college athletics by allowing schools to directly share revenue with student-athletes for the first time. [1] (LINK [2] (LINK Settlement DetailsBack Damages:

The NCAA is paying roughly $2.8 billion in back damages over 10 years to compensate former athletes who played between 2016 and 2024.


So, your simple kick rocks suggestion would result in being sued into oblivion.
Posted by BillyBobfan24_7
R.I.P. SGT Nelson
Member since May 2004
18723 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 9:32 am to
Exactly
Posted by IOU
Member since Apr 2020
406 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:06 am to
Because we have anti-trust laws that were ignored for years. It went on for so long that it became "normal". Now athletes are reversing that one court case at a time.

The medical and insurance industry needs to take notice. They are next...
Posted by QB
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2013
8656 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:15 am to
the NCAA is virtually spineless these days. It has lost its power and is holding on by a thread, and doesn't want to rock their boat any more than they have to. The NCAA is the cause of this nonsense. All they had to do is state that the 5 for 5 goes into affect August, 2027, and there is no issue. But they are a bunch of spineless, nerds with zero foresight.
Posted by Spankum
The Sip
Member since Jan 2007
63445 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:20 am to
quote:

So spankum, you think we should just continue doing what we have been doing....let the SEC selectively enforce punishment against certain teams, but look the other way when certain other members break the rules?


No, I don’t think that is what we should do at all. The SEC should be nothing but a financial entity. The NCAA should be concerned with rules of the game and organization on a national level.
Posted by NotaStarGazer
Member since Dec 2023
3280 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:26 am to
For one thing, the NCAA continues to violate BLATANTLY US laws. I will give you one example related to the SEC.

The SEC SAYS you can't transfer from one SEC school to another without sitting out a year. IF anyone bothered to challenge that, it would fall in 5 seconds. Now that NIL is around, that is called "restraint of trade". You are denying a player the right to earn a living. That obsolete "rule" is not going to be around much longer.

As far as the NCAA goes, remember the rule about sitting out a year from transferring within FBS. Gosh, I missed seeing Shea Patterson not playing for Michigan because he had to sit out. Oh wait, he didn't did he.
Posted by nvasil1
Hellinois
Member since Oct 2009
17926 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:27 am to
quote:

Because the rules set are NOT concrete and have been applied unevenly, blurring the lines THEY set.

This is the crux of the matter. They have too much ambiguity in their rules that leave themselves open to legal challenges. They're always reactive instead of proactive in addressing issues.

Moscona has said repeatedly over the last week that the NCAA was advised that they would get sued if they iced the 2022 class out of 5 for 5. They went ahead and did it anyway, and here we are.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram