0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/2/26 at 11:23 am to chadr07
quote:
At the end of the day, it comes down to how good of players you have on the field. Last year LSU didn’t have enough athleticism on defense overall to stop dual threat QBs. This year they do. Simple as that.
This. Your DTs have to be able to get off blocks and your DEs have to be able to set the edge and hold contain. Your LBs have to be able to make correct run fits and at least keep the QB moving laterally so others can rally to the ball. Your Safeties have to be able to diagnose anything getting past the front 7 and shut it down.
We’ve had multiple issues across the front 7 and Safeties over the last 2 seasons, especially in 24. We are playing some young guys up front and have some depth issues, but this is still the best starting front 7 we’ve had in a while. While losing Spears sucks, this is still a great Safety group too.
I was happily surprised at how well we did vs Auburn, but getting Weeks back in the green dot role and Dottery back just playing and not having so much responsibility should take this defense to another level.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 11:31 am to 756
There is a huge difference between a running QB and a dual threat QB. Which are we talking here? Stopping a running QB is the same as stopping a running back. Stopping a dual threat QB requires speed at the LB position, and disciplined players who stick to their assignments. The teams that tend to do the worst against a true dual threat are teams like LSU that has an attacking defense. Attacking tends to put your players out of position, especially if they get stoned by a block.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 11:42 am to swamp74
quote:He implemented sucking right away!
Tepper just didn’t have enough time to implement that great plan lol.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 11:44 am to 756
Yea man. Hire a defensive coordinator SOLELY because of some bullshite, untrue talking point on Tigerdroppings and see how that works out
Some of yall are so fricking stupid
Some of yall are so fricking stupid
Posted on 11/2/26 at 12:20 pm to PUB
quote:LSU has allowed the 7th least rushing yards to quarterbacks in the P5 and least in the SEC.
So far, definitely not Baker
We have allowed 42 total rushing yards and 5.3 rushing yards per game against quarterbacks. 67 yards have come on two plays from Parker Puckett and Byrum Brown.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 6:01 pm to AlwysATgr
quote:
Chavis was pretty good and one of his key points was speed. Put lots of speed on the field. LBs and DEs who could haul tail.
Agree. Chavis’s 4-3 was a great fit with Louisiana high school athletes
Posted on 11/2/26 at 6:23 pm to Beef Supreme
I wish I could give you 50 upvotes. This post should be a dialog pop-up that anyone posting has to click "accept" to proceed.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 6:35 pm to Beef Supreme
some fans still want to shite on Baker.
Att/Yards:
Chambliss: 9/2
Reed: 10/-13
Brown: 19/20"
14 sacks against those 3 running QBs.
Who's doing it better?
Please don't confuse my opinion with statistical evidence.
Att/Yards:
Chambliss: 9/2
Reed: 10/-13
Brown: 19/20"
14 sacks against those 3 running QBs.
Who's doing it better?
Please don't confuse my opinion with statistical evidence.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News