- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Where are all the "it's not the offense it's injuries/execution" posters
Posted on 2/11/13 at 12:58 pm to theunknownknight
Posted on 2/11/13 at 12:58 pm to theunknownknight
quote:
It sounds like there are alot of goons in here that think the offense is JUST FINE.
If it sounds like that to you, that means your reading comprehension is off.
I haven't seen any posts saying we didn't need an upgrade at OC. What I have seen is people defend the offensive scheme, because that won't be changing much.
0
Posted on 2/11/13 at 1:02 pm to theunknownknight
quote:
Ok, I'll bite. Are you in favor of the Cam Cameron hire? Yes or No
And why?
It sounds like there are alot of goons in here that think the offense is JUST FINE.
very happy with it, I think the offense suffers from poor tactical execution. I don't think the overall strategy is bad at all, but needs better play design and play calling.
Football is an analog endeavor, just because you don't think the offense has been a stink-fest guided by mass incompetence over the past 5 years doesn't mean you automatically think everything is great and running smoothly. There are shades of gray.
Posted on 2/11/13 at 1:33 pm to ForeLSU
quote:
If it sounds like that to you, that means your reading comprehension is off.
hmmmmm
quote:
very happy with it, I think the offense suffers from poor tactical execution. I don't think the overall strategy is bad at all
apparently not
Posted on 2/11/13 at 1:34 pm to theunknownknight
Oh and I forgot to 
at ForeLSU's post so...
at ForeLSU's post so... 
Posted on 2/11/13 at 1:40 pm to Gray Tiger
quote:
Now compare won/loss records. How many of those offense giants have better w/l's than LSU.
Enlighten us please.
since you bring up RESULTS,how about NC's? bama has won 3 out of the last 4. now that is not talking about the process, playcalling, game and player management. that is talking about RESULTS like so many here who know nothing about terminology and x's and o's love to do. i'll bet they do not like those RESULTS huh?
Posted on 2/11/13 at 1:42 pm to theunknownknight
quote:
theunknownknight
stop wasting your time with these people. seriously. They will defend miles and say he had a great offense and no changes were needed until the end of times. even though he just hired cam. which speaks volumes.
This post was edited on 2/11/13 at 1:49 pm
Posted on 2/11/13 at 1:43 pm to theunknownknight
nice response....
Posted on 2/11/13 at 1:43 pm to theunknownknight
quote:I've already posted I love the hire, but don't have to pick and choose stats and stir them in a bowl to dis the previous OCs just to like it.
Are you in favor of the Cam Cameron hire? Yes or No
This all about some "see I told you so" campaign for you and a few others, which I ignore until you start making shite up to prove your point.
The O would've still improved with another year together and some cohesion on OL and QB/WRs.
It happens all the time on teams acros the country.
Posted on 2/11/13 at 1:45 pm to League Champs
quote:
And ya gotta love the execution part of the excuse
wait, you mean it was the players fault that the DB's knew we were running a ton of curls and slants so they squatted on them? It was not the players fault they could not run against 9 in the box? Hmmn after reading this board everything was the players fault.
quote:
Especially in light of the decision to bench the SEC leader in pass efficiency after 8 games. It was due to poor execution, nothing to do with poor coaching
Posted on 2/11/13 at 1:45 pm to theunknownknight
quote:
apparently not
Apparently so.
ForeLSU said he is very happy with the Cam Cameron hire, and you take it to mean he is very happy with the offense.
The strategy is not bad, it's the execution, whether it be play calling or player execution.
Cam Cameron should improve both of those things, while you work on improving your reading comprehension.
This post was edited on 2/11/13 at 1:52 pm
Posted on 2/11/13 at 1:54 pm to ItNeverRains
There were entire threads defending the offense. Saying there was basically no problem. Miles proved there was a problem. Miles doesn't demote or fire people from a job for no reason. They really have to screw up badly.
Posted on 2/11/13 at 1:59 pm to peopleschamp
quote:
Miles proved there was a problem. Miles doesn't demote or fire people from a job for no reason. They really have to screw up badly.
yep. but the sheep here are in denial. good luck convincing them otherwise.
Posted on 2/11/13 at 2:01 pm to Fat Bastard
quote:
bama has won 3 out of the last 4. now that is not talking about the process, playcalling, game and player management. that is talking about RESULTS
You know how many programs have won 3 titles in 4 years since 1950? Two. 1994-97 Nebraska and now Bama. So, unless you're arguing that every single football program short of the two greatest dynasties in the past 60 years are failures, then perhaps we should dial down the RESULTS rhetoric. Since 2005, the time period brought up by knight, LSU has played in three SEC title games, won two SEC titles, and played for two national titles, winning one. Under what standard other than an argument for the best dynasties in the history of college sport is that not a resounding success?
This is what success looks like.
Posted on 2/11/13 at 2:04 pm to Fat Bastard
quote:
yep. but the sheep here are in denial. good luck convincing them otherwise
It's like you guys don't know how to read. Point out 1 post in here that says a change at OC wasn't needed or an upgrade.
This post was edited on 2/11/13 at 2:06 pm
Posted on 2/11/13 at 2:04 pm to Fat Bastard
quote:The DBs don't know shite, except a tendency for DnD.
wait, you mean it was the players fault that the DB's knew we were running a ton of curls and slants so they squatted on them?
If a DB squats on a hunch, they'll be burnt with 9n in the box as you also claim.
A DB might play a little softer or tighter depending on fear of QB/WR execution and that's what you likely mean.
There were many other patterns thrown to, just not executed well.
Posted on 2/11/13 at 2:06 pm to Fat Bastard
quote:
yep. but the sheep here are in denial. good luck convincing them otherwise.
can you provide a list of the posters who have stated that everything was great and a change didn't need to be made, that way we'll know exactly who you're arguing with, because right now it appears to be strawmen....and if you post an emoticon, that will confirm my assumption, so that is fine as well
Posted on 2/11/13 at 2:25 pm to EarthwormJim
quote:
The strategy is not bad, it's the execution, whether it be play calling or player execution.
so then you're spouting the typical Miles posi tiger defense...
bash the players
Posted on 2/11/13 at 2:27 pm to ItNeverRains
Is that the best you've got? C'mon man. 
Posted on 2/11/13 at 2:31 pm to theunknownknight
quote:
so then you're spouting the typical Miles posi tiger defense...
bash the players
There you go again with your bad reading comprehension. I said the execution in either the play calling or player execeution has not been good. A good offensive coordinator can fix those things.
Posted on 2/11/13 at 2:40 pm to PurpleNGold4Ever
Page 7 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News