Started By
Message

re: Where are all the "it's not the offense it's injuries/execution" posters

Posted on 2/11/13 at 8:12 pm to
Posted by 75helpmacpack
atlanta
Member since Dec 2012
868 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 8:12 pm to
some of these posts must be written by middle school fans......injuries really hurt last year and we were still 10-2 in the regular season.....100 other teams would kill to be 10 and 2-especially with the injuries/losses we had, and if u do not realize that execution cost us the Alabama game and the Clemson game-then u should take up posting threads about volleyball. will cam help-hell yes, but thats what it is about-improving every year.
Posted by Fat Bastard
alter hunter
Member since Mar 2009
91461 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 8:55 pm to
quote:

if u do not realize that execution cost us the Alabama game and the Clemson game-then u should take up posting threads about volleyball.




have you read any part of this damn thread? Have you paid any damn attention at all to predictability and play calling the last few years?

so 8 3 and outs was all execution against clemson?

running into 9 man fromnts is a lack of execution?

throwing a shatload of curls and slants when DB's are squatting is bad execution?

You are trolling right? you cannot be this damn STUPID.

Posted by LSU Groupee
Member since Oct 2012
4026 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 9:33 pm to
quote:

......injuries really hurt last year and we were still 10-2 in the regular season


Anyone not able to see the sizable problems our 2012 football team had to deal with due to significant injury loses in the offensive line, RB, and LB along with the loss of the HB is a fricking tool and buffoon.
This post was edited on 2/11/13 at 9:39 pm
Posted by Tiger Voodoo
Champs 03 07 09 11(fack) 19!!!
Member since Mar 2007
22120 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 9:54 pm to
Jesus Christ how the frick has this dumbass OP gotten to 8 pages???

Not reading any of this bullshite, but anyone acting like people who think the offense was showing signs of improvement and would have continued to improve even without a change at OC can't also be excited about a HUGE hire of a stellar NFL offensive coach are the epitome of cocksucking rantards.

If the Saints go out and trade for Adrian Peterson, can we be excited about that without thinking our offense has sucked the past seven seasons without him???

Improving is always good, even when things aren't horrible to begin with. Right???

:notsureifOPisserious:
This post was edited on 2/11/13 at 9:57 pm
Posted by Fat Bastard
alter hunter
Member since Mar 2009
91461 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 9:57 pm to
quote:

Anyone not able to see the sizable problems our 2012 football team had to deal with due to significant injury loses in the offensive line, RB, and LB along with the loss of the HB is a fricking tool and buffoon.



irony

see my post up above.
Posted by Mayhawman
Somewhere in the middle of SEC West
Member since Dec 2009
10482 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 9:59 pm to
quote:

so 8 3 and outs was all execution against clemson?
What results do you expect from 6 sacks vs Clemson?(execution)
quote:

running into 9 man fromnts is a lack of execution?
You're exaggerating and all runs weren't vs cover0. Maybe some short ydg, but hat on a hat and should be a 1st.(execution)

quote:

throwing a shatload of curls and slants when DB's are squatting is bad execution?
No not executing crisp breaks, selling routes and delivering to the right spot is.
Mett hit quite a few deep passes vs Bama.
Clemson was hit and miss, but there were attempts. There wasn't a whole lot of time due to OL and RB whiffs on stunts.
When plays don't work it's usually missed execution by one or more players and not the call.
There are times when a play is called against the wrong cover, but not often with all the combo routes, as long as the right read is made (execution).


Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 10:07 pm to
quote:


so 8 3 and outs was all execution against clemson?


Good luck. The positive is there are only about 4-5 of these football newbs who can't see the reality, even though it's smacking them in the face.

Same 3-4 repeating the same shite. You can't make them see the light.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 10:09 pm to
quote:

When plays don't work it's usually missed execution by one or more players and not the call.


at the end of the year and execution is still a problem you have a coaching issue.
Posted by Fat Bastard
alter hunter
Member since Mar 2009
91461 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 10:10 pm to
quote:

Good luck. The positive is there are only about 4-5 of these football newbs who can't see the reality, even though it's smacking them in the face.

Same 3-4 repeating the same shite. You can't make them see the light.




true indeed.

also, do not forget the 7 3 and outs in a row against UGA in the SECCG either. many forget those telltale signs also.
Posted by LSU Groupee
Member since Oct 2012
4026 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 10:11 pm to
quote:

see my post up above.


No

My post explains my thoughts.

If you disgree, too fricking bad.

Go piss on your Saints, troll.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 10:13 pm to
quote:


also, do not forget the 7 3 and outs in a row against UGA in the SECCG either. many forget those telltale signs also.



237 yards of offense and 42 points... Chavis and special teams baby...It sure wasn't the offense.

In the past three post post season games and the SECCG LSU is averaging less than 200 yds a game and 9 first downs...
This post was edited on 2/11/13 at 10:17 pm
Posted by Fat Bastard
alter hunter
Member since Mar 2009
91461 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 10:14 pm to
quote:

You're exaggerating and all runs weren't vs cover0.


you can have 4 wide outs and 7 men in the box and still be cover zero. miles ran against 8 and 9 man fronts a ton. safeties can still come down into the box whether it is cover 1 or 2.
Posted by Fat Bastard
alter hunter
Member since Mar 2009
91461 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 10:16 pm to
quote:

Chavis and special teams baby...




yep, in 2011 they scored a ton of points and went all year long with TONS of turnovers which gave them tons of opportunities on offense as well.

oh but the starting FP was almost the same as in 2006!
This post was edited on 2/11/13 at 10:30 pm
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 10:18 pm to
quote:


yep, they scored a ton of points and went all year long with TONS of turnovers which gave them tons of opportunities on offense as well.



Yep. I have hope things will change for the better on offense though. Can't get worse.
Posted by Fat Bastard
alter hunter
Member since Mar 2009
91461 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 10:19 pm to
LSU Groupee
Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts (All Sites): 268
Registered on: 10/5/2012
Online Status: Online





quote:

My post explains my thoughts.

If you disgree, too fricking bad.



which shows how stupid and clueless you are NOOBIE.

quote:

Go piss on your Saints, troll.



Posted by sunnydaze
Member since Jan 2010
32955 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 10:24 pm to
quote:

at the end of the year and execution is still a problem you have a coaching issue.
Posted by Fat Bastard
alter hunter
Member since Mar 2009
91461 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 10:28 pm to
quote:

quote:
at the end of the year and execution is still a problem you have a coaching issue.


yup. without a doubt.
Posted by ForeLSU
The Corner of Sanity and Madness
Member since Sep 2003
41525 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 10:35 pm to
quote:

yep, in 2011 they scored a ton of points and went all year long with TONS of turnovers which gave them tons of opportunities on offense as well.

oh but the starting FP was almost the same as in 2006!


I've destroyed this argument once and left 90% of the rant laughing at you, out of the goodness of my heart I won't do it again...
Posted by LSUTil_iDie
Lawrenceville, GA
Member since Jan 2012
5511 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 10:42 pm to
quote:

at the end of the year and execution is still a problem you have a coaching issue.



Which is why a change was made. Last year was a culmination of shitty playcalling, lack of execution and injuries and we still finished 10-2. You can't really point to one specific thing and say, "That's the reason." I think had 2011 not happened the way it did Miles would have made a change a lot sooner.
Posted by Mayhawman
Somewhere in the middle of SEC West
Member since Dec 2009
10482 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 10:54 pm to
quote:

yep, they scored a ton of points and went all year long with TONS of turnovers which gave them tons of opportunities on offense as well.
2011 had 6 TDs on 30 TOs, yet 2003 defense scored 7 TDs on 33 TOs. 2011 had less total return yds than 2003 also.
Are you similarly disgusted with the 2003 offense that scored less toital points and offensive TDs, with all that ST and defensive help?

2011 and 2003 each lost a game, but only one of those losses was to an unranked team. How do you feel about that?

Don't let your 1-9-12 butthurt get in the way of objectivity.
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram