- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: When a player decides to opt out can their NIL be pro-rated?
Posted on 11/23/25 at 9:15 am to ODoyleRulez
Posted on 11/23/25 at 9:15 am to ODoyleRulez
quote:
If they feel they are no longer marketable??
It should work both ways.
0
Posted on 11/23/25 at 9:17 am to Complete Linebacking
quote:
the marketing benefit to said company is theoretically reduced
Not
Posted on 11/23/25 at 9:19 am to themunch
Let me ask a question. NIL is for the player not his team? He can take his likeness anywhere he pleases.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 9:22 am to Complete Linebacking
NIL are private contracts that could have basically any terms included.
Since these contracts are backed by serious money, I have just assumed they were written more favorably for the one paying it, rather than the kid that agrees to it. Or, they have at least been corrected after a few people got burned by the transfer portal, opt outs, etc.
Since these contracts are backed by serious money, I have just assumed they were written more favorably for the one paying it, rather than the kid that agrees to it. Or, they have at least been corrected after a few people got burned by the transfer portal, opt outs, etc.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 9:23 am to Complete Linebacking
NIL no, but rev share yes.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 9:27 am to mdomingue
quote:Yes, but again there are absolutely ways around this based on the language of what is allowed.
The NCAA says it cannot be tied to playing for a particular school nor can it be tied to on-field performance or playing time.
Not all of these companies are just giving tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars away with no recourse if the athletes bail. They aren't all as dumb as you think they are.
This post was edited on 11/23/25 at 9:29 am
Posted on 11/23/25 at 9:28 am to Gravitiger
quote:
Yes, but again there are absolutely ways around this based on the language of what is allowed.
Give me an example.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 9:28 am to OceanMan
quote:
NIL are private contracts that could have basically any terms included.
Not and have the player remain eligible.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 9:30 am to Complete Linebacking
After last night's game, I'm starting to believe that other schools pay SOME of LSU's players to keep them playing FOR LSU.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 9:36 am to TigerDCC11
Then the entire offensive line is being paid not to play.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 9:43 am to Amused Lurker
quote:
NIL isn’t pay for play.
LOLOLOLOL
quote:
It’s marketing based.
Hey, it makes perfect sense to give a player six and seven figures for being on a cardboard poster.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 9:46 am to mdomingue
quote:
Not and have the player remain eligible.
I get what you are saying, but it would just take a little creativity writing the contract. Transfers are easier than opt outs
Posted on 11/23/25 at 9:54 am to Amused Lurker
quote:
NIL isn’t pay for
Posted on 11/23/25 at 10:16 am to Complete Linebacking
The player will just pull a Stingley and Nuss and fake an injury.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 10:19 am to JakeFromStateFarm
People’s willful want to pretend is amazing.
Yeah Nuss got paid because he’s an excellent Math prodigy.
Retards
Yeah Nuss got paid because he’s an excellent Math prodigy.
Retards
Posted on 11/23/25 at 10:27 am to Complete Linebacking
Are you Verge’s son?
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News