Started By
Message

re: What will lsu record next regular season need to be for a successful year?

Posted on 11/28/23 at 3:31 pm to
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
65298 posts
Posted on 11/28/23 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

Major bowl winners are better than mere top 25. It's a pretty simple concept.

You can win a major bowl with 3 losses (like WVU). Finishing with 3 losses and ranked #17 is not better than finishing in the top 10 no matter how much you want it to be
quote:

SO I shall just take your word that 2011 was not impressive

Literally have not said that. I said comparing the 2011 and 2012 schedules is splitting hairs, because it is and I showed you how. I'm sorry if you don't like facts that don't support your conclusion. And I also said the 2019 team had more quality wins because they did, beating 5 top 10 teams and 7 total ranked teams. No need to get emotional about it and make up arguments that were never made
This post was edited on 11/28/23 at 3:32 pm
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84377 posts
Posted on 11/28/23 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

No need to get emotional about it and make up arguments that were never made


Says the guy bringing up 2019 in a conversation about 11 and 12
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
65298 posts
Posted on 11/28/23 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

Says the guy bringing up 2019 in a conversation about 11 and 12


Well when you make a comment like the 2011 team had more quality wins than anyone ever, you're going to get a response to it
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84377 posts
Posted on 11/28/23 at 3:37 pm to
2011 is regarded as one of the best schedules ever. 2012 is not. You've moved the argument to 2019 because you know there's no defending the claim about 2012.

Basically no one brings up 2012 as one of the toughest schedules ever, because it wasn't. End of discussion.
Posted by BayouCowboy
Member since Dec 2012
14506 posts
Posted on 11/28/23 at 3:44 pm to
quote:


I agree with this to a point. It may be picking nits with the rankings(yes, rankings are highly subjective, but they do have at least some merit) but, we can be consistently top 6 without having to be Top 3 and not have those problems. What we cant be is 10-15th with 6 conference teams ahead of us.

I agree. I don't think we need to be top 3, but we have to consistently be near the top and not have a disparity when it comes to position groups. By that I mean we've had classes that rank high, but lack quality OL or DL or LBs. DBs used to be a given, but right now we are lacking and DTs are very limited.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
65298 posts
Posted on 11/28/23 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

You've moved the argument to 2019

I moved it to 2019 because you opened the door wide open for it
quote:

you know there's no defending the claim about 2012.

I've put on my proof. Like I said, it's splitting hairs.
quote:

2011 is regarded as one of the best schedules ever.

By LSU fans and who else?
quote:

Basically no one brings up 2012 as one of the toughest schedules ever,

Because the 2012 team didn't choke in the national title game after an undefeated regular season
quote:

End of discussion.

whatever you say bud
This post was edited on 11/28/23 at 3:55 pm
Posted by TheRouxGuru
Member since Nov 2019
8588 posts
Posted on 11/28/23 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

What will lsu record next regular season need to be for a successful year?


Bro, you’re on the tiger rant… anything less than 11-1 or 12-0 is a MASSIVE failure.

Posted by Tigerlaff
FIGHTING out of the Carencro Sonic
Member since Jan 2010
20908 posts
Posted on 11/28/23 at 3:59 pm to
Must make playoff. Don't care about record.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
28588 posts
Posted on 11/28/23 at 4:01 pm to
quote:

Ok fine. You don’t get to lower your expectations because other teams are improving more than you are. If other teams are going out and getting better coaches and players than LSU, and in turn improving more than LSU, that’s not a good excuse to why expectations should be lowered. Results matter.



Here's where I think the disconnect is. You (and others) are talking about PROGRAM expectations, whereas I am talking about SEASON expectations.

I agree, whole heartedly, that program expectations should be to compete for national championships. No question. But it is hard to set a level of expectation for next SEASON without knowing (1) who is on LSU's roster; (2) who will be on LSU's coaching staff...most notably, DC, and (3) what does the competition look like next season.

I can want LSU to compete for a title next year. I can want the program to have an overall program expectation of competing for championships. That will be the case every year. But it may be unreasonable to EXPECT that result will happen next season with a new, relatively inexperienced QB (still has yet to start a college game); A WR group that will almost assuredly lose two guys who combined for 146 of 255 total receptions (57%) and 29 of 41 receiving TDs (71%) [more if Lacy leaves] and a defense, albeit likely with a new DC, that will still be somewhat talent depleted if the narrative that this year's defense significantly lacked is to be accepted.

Basically, you are saying "I don't care that LSU is losing a TON of production." I don't care that the competition they face may get better. I EXPECT them to compete for a championship next year solely because it is year 3. Not all seasons and not all teams are created equal. Given the variables in play, experienced QB, experienced and talented WRs, experienced RB group; a full returning starting OL, a "down" SEC, THIS was the season for big expectations. It didn't matter that this was only year 2 for Kelly. The pieces were in place relative to the competition. That's probably not going to be the case next year. Just as it wasn't in 2020 with the exodus of talent following the 2019 season. Or was the expectation that LSU should have been even better in 2020 because it was year 4 under O instead of year 3?

I WANT LSU to compete for a championship next season. I just don't EXPECT it given the (likely) personnel losses.
This post was edited on 11/28/23 at 4:02 pm
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
36670 posts
Posted on 11/28/23 at 4:12 pm to
quote:


In your opinion what is that? Would 9-3 cut it since it’s a tough schedule or should lsu be 10-2 or better since it’s year theee under Kelly


It's hard to say right now, but in a perfect world I'd like to see either an SEC championship appearance or a playoff appearance.
Posted by LSBoosie
Member since Jun 2020
8132 posts
Posted on 11/28/23 at 4:29 pm to
Here's the thing though, it is the coach's responsibility to be able to replace production and improve the coaching staff. It is his responsibility to keep up with how much other programs are improving.

I didn't expect the 2020 team to be better than the 2019 team. However, I did expect them to be over .500. They didn't live up to expectations. In year 3 of BK, I expect the team to make a 12 team playoff. I already stated I didn't expect them to win the national championship.

Basically, you are saying BK could go out and hire a bad DC every year, not do well in the portal, and have a bad recruiting class then use that as an excuse as to why they aren't living up to expectations. "How are we supposed to compete when we missed on portal guys again, missed on the coaching staff, and didn't recruit good enough players"

LSU fans shouldn't lower expectations because this staff wasted the 2nd best offense in school history and now has to replace that production. LSU fans shouldn't lower expectations because we currently have the 8th best recruiting class in the SEC. It is the coach's responsibility to maintain a level of play and improve what needs to be improved in order to meet expectations.
This post was edited on 11/28/23 at 4:39 pm
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram