Started By
Message
locked post

"We may get the Bama OK st matchup we wanted last year" - CFB Live

Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:02 pm
Posted by Fbohn1
Member since Jun 2009
213 posts
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:02 pm
Guy on CFB live just said this at the end of the show about the upcoming year's NC.

Maybe he forgot that we were No. 1 at the time? and we were the one that deserve it at the time?

Have at it Tiger Rant.
Posted by eXfaktor
A 10 by 11 Dump
Member since Jan 2011
1559 posts
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:03 pm to
I was like









Posted by wope
Member since Aug 2011
5682 posts
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:04 pm to
were they definitely referring to the NC game? lol
Posted by Tigerdew
The Garden District of Da' Parish
Member since Dec 2003
13594 posts
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:05 pm to
ESPN gonna ESPN I guess.
Posted by stapuffmarshy
lower 9
Member since Apr 2010
17507 posts
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:05 pm to
they have said this before



and someone should remind them that THEY wanted the rematch....them and the gumps


no one else wanted that bullshite



and I must have missed the regular season game that LSU lost last year to knock them out of the BCSCG


fricking losers at ESPN are unreal
Posted by eXfaktor
A 10 by 11 Dump
Member since Jan 2011
1559 posts
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

and I must have missed the regular season game that LSU lost last year to knock them out of the BCSCG


Boom. ESPN hates LSU.
Posted by tigerfan in bamaland
Back Home now
Member since Sep 2006
61080 posts
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:06 pm to
turrible.
Posted by Fbohn1
Member since Jun 2009
213 posts
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:06 pm to
He was referring to a "dark horse" possibility from OkSt for this year, and since he referred to OkSt I can only assume he was talking about last years NC since they were in the talk so much.
Posted by brewhan davey
Audubon Place
Member since Sep 2010
32782 posts
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:10 pm to
They didn't want Ok St-Bama.. they wanted a rematch, and they got it.
Posted by Delacroix
Member since Oct 2008
3985 posts
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:10 pm to
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
60254 posts
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:11 pm to
Wasn't watching, but isn't the host a Bama alum?
Posted by RBWilliams8
Member since Oct 2009
53417 posts
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:11 pm to
Posted by Fight4LSU
Kenner
Member since Jul 2005
9754 posts
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:11 pm to
What a dumbass! If anything it would have been LSU and OSU. Which is should have been anyways. But those idiots pushed and pushed for a rematch.
Posted by Broyota2
Member since Nov 2010
13037 posts
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:11 pm to
idiots...
Posted by Drew Orleans
Member since Mar 2010
21577 posts
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:14 pm to
You sure he wasn't referring to the hypothetical game they wanted played to see who got to face us in the NC?
Posted by Guava Jelly
Bawston
Member since Jul 2009
11651 posts
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:15 pm to
Just when ESPN's trash journalism begins to fade into my mind's peripheral, they go and say some stupid shite like that.
Posted by MetryTyger
Metro NOLA, LA
Member since Jan 2004
15580 posts
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:16 pm to
I am fricking nauseated at the FECESPN jock-sniffers swallowing the sperm of Alabama.

"We may get the BAMA OK State matchup we wanted last year."
Who the phuck is """"""""""we""""""""""" ?

It SHOULD have been #1 LSU vs #2 Okla. State.
If the BCS rules would have TRULY been followed - Okie State's SOS was WAYYYY better than Bama's.
Okie State won their conference title by DESTROYING former #1 Oklahoma, and worst of all....WORST OF ALL............ a small faction of BCS Human Poll Voters and Coaches voted Oklahoma State FIFTH OR SIXTH!!
If just that small group had voted Okie State 2nd or 3rd, Alabama would NOT have been in the Dome on Jan. 9.
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59078 posts
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:16 pm to
either then mean Bama-OK State after the bowls in a true +1, which would not have happened because if there was a +1, LSU would not have played Bama in a Bowl.

Or they mean seeing Bama play Ok State for the right to play LSU in the NCG.
Posted by AllBamaDoesIsWin
Member since Dec 2011
26725 posts
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

and someone should remind them that THEY wanted the rematch....them and the gumps


This is the problem. People look at it like it was about who gets to play LSU. It was about who gets to play for a BCS Title. Roy Kramer, inventor of the BCS, himself said it was about the best teams playing.

Bama/LSU were the best teams.
Posted by stapuffmarshy
lower 9
Member since Apr 2010
17507 posts
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

either then mean Bama-OK State after the bowls in a true +1, which would not have happened because if there was a +1, LSU would not have played Bama in a Bowl.

Or they mean seeing Bama play Ok State for the right to play LSU in the NCG.


they don't mean any of that. They have brought this up before


Their meaning is...Bama shoulda won the first game really and then it would have been the matchup they wanted


and no Im not shitting you...one of their fools explained it about a month ago- on air-

"well bama really shoulda won the first and then it woulda been OKC vs Bama which would have been a fantastic match-up"

:fricking really:
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram