- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
"We may get the Bama OK st matchup we wanted last year" - CFB Live
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:02 pm
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:02 pm
Guy on CFB live just said this at the end of the show about the upcoming year's NC.
Maybe he forgot that we were No. 1 at the time? and we were the one that deserve it at the time?
Have at it Tiger Rant.
Maybe he forgot that we were No. 1 at the time? and we were the one that deserve it at the time?
Have at it Tiger Rant.
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:04 pm to Fbohn1
were they definitely referring to the NC game? lol
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:05 pm to Fbohn1
they have said this before
and someone should remind them that THEY wanted the rematch....them and the gumps
no one else wanted that bullshite
and I must have missed the regular season game that LSU lost last year to knock them out of the BCSCG
fricking losers at ESPN are unreal
and someone should remind them that THEY wanted the rematch....them and the gumps
no one else wanted that bullshite
and I must have missed the regular season game that LSU lost last year to knock them out of the BCSCG
fricking losers at ESPN are unreal
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:06 pm to stapuffmarshy
quote:
and I must have missed the regular season game that LSU lost last year to knock them out of the BCSCG
Boom. ESPN hates LSU.
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:06 pm to wope
He was referring to a "dark horse" possibility from OkSt for this year, and since he referred to OkSt I can only assume he was talking about last years NC since they were in the talk so much.
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:10 pm to Fbohn1
They didn't want Ok St-Bama.. they wanted a rematch, and they got it.
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:11 pm to Fbohn1
Wasn't watching, but isn't the host a Bama alum?
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:11 pm to Fbohn1
What a dumbass! If anything it would have been LSU and OSU. Which is should have been anyways. But those idiots pushed and pushed for a rematch.
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:14 pm to Fbohn1
You sure he wasn't referring to the hypothetical game they wanted played to see who got to face us in the NC?
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:15 pm to Fbohn1
Just when ESPN's trash journalism begins to fade into my mind's peripheral, they go and say some stupid shite like that.
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:16 pm to Fbohn1
I am fricking nauseated at the FECESPN jock-sniffers swallowing the sperm of Alabama.
"We may get the BAMA OK State matchup we wanted last year."
Who the phuck is """"""""""we""""""""""" ?
It SHOULD have been #1 LSU vs #2 Okla. State.
If the BCS rules would have TRULY been followed - Okie State's SOS was WAYYYY better than Bama's.
Okie State won their conference title by DESTROYING former #1 Oklahoma, and worst of all....WORST OF ALL............ a small faction of BCS Human Poll Voters and Coaches voted Oklahoma State FIFTH OR SIXTH!!
If just that small group had voted Okie State 2nd or 3rd, Alabama would NOT have been in the Dome on Jan. 9.
"We may get the BAMA OK State matchup we wanted last year."
Who the phuck is """"""""""we""""""""""" ?
It SHOULD have been #1 LSU vs #2 Okla. State.
If the BCS rules would have TRULY been followed - Okie State's SOS was WAYYYY better than Bama's.
Okie State won their conference title by DESTROYING former #1 Oklahoma, and worst of all....WORST OF ALL............ a small faction of BCS Human Poll Voters and Coaches voted Oklahoma State FIFTH OR SIXTH!!
If just that small group had voted Okie State 2nd or 3rd, Alabama would NOT have been in the Dome on Jan. 9.
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:16 pm to Fbohn1
either then mean Bama-OK State after the bowls in a true +1, which would not have happened because if there was a +1, LSU would not have played Bama in a Bowl.
Or they mean seeing Bama play Ok State for the right to play LSU in the NCG.
Or they mean seeing Bama play Ok State for the right to play LSU in the NCG.
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:19 pm to stapuffmarshy
quote:
and someone should remind them that THEY wanted the rematch....them and the gumps
This is the problem. People look at it like it was about who gets to play LSU. It was about who gets to play for a BCS Title. Roy Kramer, inventor of the BCS, himself said it was about the best teams playing.
Bama/LSU were the best teams.
Posted on 8/2/12 at 3:20 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:
either then mean Bama-OK State after the bowls in a true +1, which would not have happened because if there was a +1, LSU would not have played Bama in a Bowl.
Or they mean seeing Bama play Ok State for the right to play LSU in the NCG.
they don't mean any of that. They have brought this up before
Their meaning is...Bama shoulda won the first game really and then it would have been the matchup they wanted
and no Im not shitting you...one of their fools explained it about a month ago- on air-
"well bama really shoulda won the first and then it woulda been OKC vs Bama which would have been a fantastic match-up"
:fricking really:
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News