- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 9/2/25 at 8:18 pm to GumboPot
It’s another one of those ‘judgment’ calls like offensive holding and pass interference that give the officials too much control over the potential outcome of games. But that’s just the way it is.
Posted on 9/2/25 at 8:23 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
the tackle affects the trajectory of the throw
There was a WR close enough, with that in mind.
The LSU tackler did NOT affect the throw...pure and simple. The QB was throwing it on the line where it ended up. And according to your own supplied picture the receiver was a full 10 yards further down the field. The ball landed on the 15 which was 10 yards behind the LOS. It WAS clearly intentional grounding and another blown referee call.
This post was edited on 9/2/25 at 8:31 pm
Posted on 9/2/25 at 8:27 pm to 62zip
quote:
You honestly think a QB who throws the ball directly into the hands of a defender is going to get hit with an ING flag? Seriously? Watch much football?
One who clearly was trying to throw it away after being wrapped up for a big sack and was so panicked that he threw it at his o lineman thinking it was a receiver and hit a d lineman should
Posted on 9/2/25 at 8:28 pm to 62zip
quote:
You talking about the pass that hit him in the hands? I bet if you really try, you can figure out why that's not grounding.
Uh, NOT the pass being talked about. The one being talked about was Clemson as the 25 yard line, the QB went outside the tackle box (that was fine) but knew he was being tackled and threw the ball 10 yards BEHIND the LOS as it landed at the 15. There was NO receiver in the area...the nearest one 10 yards down the field at the original LOS. It WAS intentional grounding...the classic definition. No eligible receiver in the area and didn't get to the LOS. Refs blew the call.
Posted on 9/2/25 at 8:30 pm to NotaStarGazer
quote:
Tough shite that the tackle affected the throw...if he did...irrelevant. And according to your own supplied picture the receiver was a full 10 yards further down the field. The ball landed on the 15 which was 10 yards behind the LOS. It WAS clearly intentional grounding and another blown referee call.
Just say you don’t know the rule next time
Posted on 9/2/25 at 8:31 pm to Lgrnwd
quote:
Because Lafayette hates LSU
Lafayette does not hate LSU. There are a very small, myopic group of USL fans who can't even fill up their own stadium that hate LSU. Far more LSU fans in Lafayette.
Posted on 9/2/25 at 8:33 pm to Lester Earl
Klubnik doesn't even start the throwing motion until AFTER contact.
Posted on 9/2/25 at 8:34 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
One who clearly was trying to throw it away after being wrapped up for a big sack and was so panicked that he threw it at his o lineman thinking it was a receiver and hit a d lineman should
That's nice, but you still aren't getting an ING flag there.
I guess your answer to my question would be, "no."
Posted on 9/2/25 at 8:35 pm to GumboPot
Because the head referee Gatreaux is a ULL guy that hates LSU per his neighbors and was on the same crew that fricked us lady year
Posted on 9/2/25 at 8:35 pm to NotaStarGazer
Youtube Link
I brought it up.
Here’s the play in question. Dude pulls a max Johnson and no eligible receiver around
I brought it up.
Here’s the play in question. Dude pulls a max Johnson and no eligible receiver around
Posted on 9/2/25 at 8:36 pm to Lester Earl
The tackle did NOT affect the throw as I said in my edited message. I know the rule and stated it properly in another post to another poster. It WAS intentional grounding because the ball didn't get back to the LOS AND there was no receiver in the area. To clam one 10 yards down the field is laughable! And the QB's flight of the ball was NOT affected by the tackle. It went on the line he meant to throw it all. There was an LSU defender (#3) right by the Clemson guy at the 25 yard line. If you think he was remotely trying to throw it there, then you don't know much about avoiding turnovers.
This post was edited on 9/2/25 at 8:44 pm
Posted on 9/2/25 at 8:36 pm to 62zip
quote:
That's nice, but you still aren't getting an ING flag there. I guess your answer to my question would be, "no."
You suck at interpreting the rule then.
Posted on 9/2/25 at 8:37 pm to Lester Earl
So it was behind los....ig...
And no it was not near a reciever. No.
And no it was not near a reciever. No.
This post was edited on 9/2/25 at 8:38 pm
Posted on 9/2/25 at 8:42 pm to Lester Earl
The only justification that I could see is if the ref straight up said that there was a receiver in the area. But I don't consider a WR 10-15 yards away as in the area. And 8/10 times neither does the ref.
This post was edited on 9/2/25 at 8:43 pm
Posted on 9/2/25 at 8:42 pm to Adam Banks
Wow!!! I did not remember that particular play like that. That ALSO was intentional grounding. They usually give a little leeway when being hit but my God, you could tell by the motion that he was basically just trying to move his arm forward...had no idea where any receiver was.. He was just panicking and got away with it. So that is 2 intentional grounding calls they missed. They did call 1 I think but they gave that Clemson QB GIFTS! Both of those ended up being obvious penalties.
Posted on 9/2/25 at 8:43 pm to NotaStarGazer
Ya, having a defender on your legs doesn’t affect your throw
Lmao
It’s one big conspiracy
Lmao
It’s one big conspiracy
Posted on 9/2/25 at 8:46 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
You suck at interpreting the rule then.
I know the rule, you just suck at understanding it.
Find me some clips of a quarterback throwing the ball into the hands of a defender and getting flagged for intentional grounding.
Let n/uss do that and get flagged and you would be here crying like a bitch.
Posted on 9/2/25 at 8:47 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
Ya, having a defender on your legs doesn’t affect your throw
Sometimes it definitely does but not in this case. He was being tackled directly from behind. He knew exactly where he was going to throw it and he threw it there....10 yards behind the LOS. In THIS case, the tackle made no difference. It would have been an INT if he had thrown it to the 25 yards line because the LSU defender was in the better position. So lmao all you want. There is a reason everyone is dumping on you....that is what happens when you are wrong and post nonsense!
This post was edited on 9/2/25 at 8:55 pm
Posted on 9/2/25 at 8:47 pm to TutHillTiger
quote:
Because the head referee Gatreaux is a ULL guy that hates LSU per his neighbors and was on the same crew that fricked us lady year
Yes, of course. Some anonymous slapdicks on the internet tell you they're his neighbors and he hates L.S.U. and you're just stupid enough to believe that.
Oh and there is no such thing as a "head referee."
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News