- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Updated 4-year recruiting rankings for all 130 teams, where the SEC completely dominates
Posted on 2/7/19 at 12:02 pm to DesenselessPlayer
Posted on 2/7/19 at 12:02 pm to DesenselessPlayer
quote:
And in the heads of the ones who used them.
All 2-3 people that seem to own you.
Posted on 2/7/19 at 12:02 pm to tduecen
The # 10 ranked team has as many national titles as the #1 team. Did Clemson just get lucky that their recruits developed so well or was it astute recruiting and great coaching?
Or did they land two incredible quarterbacks?
For all their reruiting prowess BAMA was a couple of plays or so from no titles.
You have to have a great QB or a good one who plays great in the playoffs.
Or did they land two incredible quarterbacks?
For all their reruiting prowess BAMA was a couple of plays or so from no titles.
You have to have a great QB or a good one who plays great in the playoffs.
Posted on 2/7/19 at 12:03 pm to DesenselessPlayer
quote:
A swing and a miss. Just like Orgeron recruiting linemen.
Like last year when he signed 7 defensive linemen including 5 defensive tackles. If that's a swing and a miss, I'll take it.
DT's:
Chasen Hines
Davin Cotton
Dare Rosenthal
Nelson Jenkins
Dominic Livingston
Posted on 2/7/19 at 12:05 pm to tduecen
quote:One of these is not like the others.
1. Alabama
2. Georgia
3. LSU
4. Oklahoma
5. Ohio State
Posted on 2/7/19 at 12:05 pm to tigersbb
quote:
Or did they land two incredible quarterbacks?
For all their reruiting prowess BAMA was a couple of plays or so from no titles.
You have to have a great QB or a good one who plays great in the playoffs.
bama relied too heavily on the QB this season and it cost them in the end. Tua is a hell of a talent but he's still limited when his primary gets shut down.
Posted on 2/7/19 at 12:05 pm to lsufball19
The “rebuild” excuse has been used since Orgeron took over. I’m pointing out that this “excuse” can no longer be used. (It was always invalid because if you do the 4 years prior to this ranking you will still end up at #3 or #4).
Posted on 2/7/19 at 12:05 pm to RogerTheShrubber
I agree this year is put up or shut up.
But only one team in that top five plays Alabama every year.
A bigger question to me is why can we not retain and develop players ala Clemson, not Alabama. Their recruiting numbers are worse but their finishes are better. And yes,being in the the ACC would help.
But only one team in that top five plays Alabama every year.
A bigger question to me is why can we not retain and develop players ala Clemson, not Alabama. Their recruiting numbers are worse but their finishes are better. And yes,being in the the ACC would help.
Posted on 2/7/19 at 12:08 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
bama relied too heavily on the QB this season and it cost them in the end. Tua is a hell of a talent but he's still limited when his primary gets shut down.
He never really faced pressure situations until the SEC title game and the championship game and he didn't handle either very well.
Posted on 2/7/19 at 12:10 pm to tduecen
So, in other words, 10-2 should be the floor each year and 11-1 with a loss to Bama shouldn't be "absurd expectations"
Posted on 2/7/19 at 12:10 pm to DesenselessPlayer
quote:
over. I’m pointing out that this “excuse” can no longer be used
I don't think anyone really cares what you want. It's just kinda funny to watch you melt every day.
Posted on 2/7/19 at 12:10 pm to Lou the Jew from LSU
quote:
I agree this year is put up or shut up.
It is. Reminds me of 2013 season a lot. But we should do better.
Posted on 2/7/19 at 12:11 pm to DesenselessPlayer
quote:
“It confirms that it can no longer be used as an excuse. Roger on has had enough time to “rebuild” and this verifies it. If we are “weak” in one position, (I.e., defensive line or Offensive line) it is now 100% on Orgeron. No more excuses.”
Well, I guess, if you think he should be able to field a team of only true freshman and sophomores and dominate. Of course, 2/3 of that score is from 25 guys that haven’t even seen a spring game yet.
I do think it tells us that the program appears to be pointed in the right direction, though.
Posted on 2/7/19 at 12:12 pm to tigersbb
quote:
The # 10 ranked team has as many national titles as the #1 team. Did Clemson just get lucky that their recruits developed so well or was it astute recruiting and great coaching?
The explanation is quite simple.
Alabama has more paying members on 24/7 than Clemson. Until Clemson ponies up and makes large gains in membership they will never finish ahead of Bama in recruiting.
Badly kick their arse on the field - YES. Finish ahead of them in recruiting on 24/7 - NO WAY IN HELL. Even though they have proven on the field to have better players.
If Clemson wants the recruiting MNC they need to pony up. Somehow I don't think the program or fans give a shite about their recruiting rankings.
Posted on 2/7/19 at 12:12 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I don't think anyone really cares what you want. It's just kinda funny to watch you melt every day.
Go away Ree. People who actually know football are talking here.
Posted on 2/7/19 at 12:13 pm to The Mick
quote:
One of these is not like the others.
One of them has a national title the last 4 years and the others don't.
Posted on 2/7/19 at 12:13 pm to Tiger Ree
He switched back to the Ree account. Lol
Posted on 2/7/19 at 12:14 pm to DesenselessPlayer
quote:
I’m pointing out that this “excuse” can no longer be used
sure, now that you've realized your original comment made no sense based on the formula the guy used
Posted on 2/7/19 at 12:15 pm to DesenselessPlayer
quote:
(It was always invalid because if you do the 4 years prior to this ranking you will still end up at #3 or #4).
True - as long as you ignore the attrition that happens. If a team loses two five star recruits from the same class, does that class keep its high ranking?
Posted on 2/7/19 at 12:17 pm to RogerTheShrubber
We lost a ton on defense in 2013
Mingo, Monty, Logan, Minter, edwards, Reid , Downs and Therald Simon.
Should be much better on defense this year than 2013.
Mingo, Monty, Logan, Minter, edwards, Reid , Downs and Therald Simon.
Should be much better on defense this year than 2013.
Posted on 2/7/19 at 12:20 pm to KLSU
quote:
Alabama = 93%
UGA = 76%
LSU = 70%
Oklahoma = 85%
Ohio St = 89%
That Oklahoma and Ohio St schedule though. And Clemson for that matter. I'm not making excuses, we should win more and it's playoffs/championship game or bust this year, but what OK, Oh St, and Clemson have to do to get to the playoffs and what we have to do is not the same. It's not even close to the same, actually.
Back to top
