24
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
This isn't a hill worth dying on....
Posted on 8/26/26 at 12:10 pm
Posted on 8/26/26 at 12:10 pm
We have a talented roster, let's play with who we have and focus on this season. Sure we could add depth with a couple of guys, but the penalties and fight isn't worth it. We need to focus on our season.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 12:11 pm to tiger81
Yep. Just ask General Custer how that turned out for him.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 12:11 pm to tiger81
Who is we?
Posted on 8/26/26 at 12:14 pm to tiger81
Next week can't get here fast enough...
Posted on 8/26/26 at 12:14 pm to tiger81
Yea I agree allowing pro players into the shouldn’t be allowed.
RJ shouldn’t be allowed (sorry if that offends).
But the SEC picking and choosing who is allowed to have a 6th year or went to a mini-camp never signed a contract but gets a TRO and now is allowed to play is absolutely worth the fight imo. It’s the principle. Judge fairly and accurately or stfu.
RJ shouldn’t be allowed (sorry if that offends).
But the SEC picking and choosing who is allowed to have a 6th year or went to a mini-camp never signed a contract but gets a TRO and now is allowed to play is absolutely worth the fight imo. It’s the principle. Judge fairly and accurately or stfu.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 12:28 pm to tiger81
We arent dying on any hill. We voted yes for the rules, remember? If they players choose to sue, that is on them.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 12:29 pm to Raging Tiger
quote:
RJ shouldn’t be allowed (sorry if that offends).
don't be sorry to people who don't understand logic
Posted on 8/26/26 at 12:30 pm to tiger81
Exactly. This era of suing for eligibility needs to end.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 12:45 pm to tiger81
Let’s let Lane decide on whether it’s worth it
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:00 pm to GeauxLaneTrain
quote:
Let’s let Lane decide on whether it’s worth it
With litigation pending, I don’t think it’s up to Lane or LSU. I think the SEC came up with some superficial crap for PR. They don’t supercede a court’s ruling and they know that.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:09 pm to tiger81
I mean in that sense, smart move by Sanky. Make it the most hassle to fight against that LSU just gives up.
I’m ok either way. Not a big deal to me. But if LSU fights it, just hire some folks to take care of it and focus on football
I’m ok either way. Not a big deal to me. But if LSU fights it, just hire some folks to take care of it and focus on football
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:11 pm to tiger81
It's a player lawsuit and it's all about money. I think they'll think differently about it than you do.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:18 pm to Tiger in the Sticks
quote:
With litigation pending, I don’t think it’s up to Lane or LSU. I think the SEC came up with some superficial crap for PR. They don’t supercede a court’s ruling and they know that.
The next step is SEC teams declaring that they will not play other teams that violate the rule. That is what ended the Sorsby affair, not any TRO, injunction, or league rule. The SEC is trying to sidestep that mess hoping that LSU backs down.
And sorry but Lane Kiffin should not be the one who decides whether LSU complies with the rule. The long-term impact on LSU and LSU athletics must be decided by the University President.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:22 pm to ATLTiger24
The ole miss would be without Trinidad. UT would be without their tackle.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:27 pm to Hold That Tiger 10
quote:
Who is we?
1) the semantics arguments over laguage are always stupid. "we" is LSU. The team WE all support.
2) He is specifically talking about Lane Kiffin and the staff. Focus on the task at hand, not this other bullshite. Don't go on McAfee to tell your side and continue to fight this. Focus on Clemson and figure out the 5 for 5 guys if they somehow become eligible.
Its similar to the Sorsby situation in that at some point, the juice just isn't worth the squeeze.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:31 pm to tiger81
100% agree
Posted on 8/26/26 at 2:48 pm to DesertCajun
Thanks Bert.... when I give my money to the athletic department, I consider it " We ".
Posted on 8/26/26 at 2:51 pm to tiger81
Nobody that matters is trying to die on any hill. It’s just some crazy fans. It isn’t the first time a portion of our fan base acted insane.
This post was edited on 8/26/26 at 2:53 pm
Posted on 8/26/26 at 2:53 pm to tiger81
quote:Ok Brandon
We have a talented roster, let's play with who we have and focus on this season. Sure we could add depth with a couple of guys, but the penalties and fight isn't worth it. We need to focus on our season.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 2:58 pm to tiger81
I have 0 issue with the SEC doing this except, why is it so different for other schools to have allowed 6th year players when they got local injuctions to get around NCAA rulings? How's the 5/5 any different seeing as they were forced to go to the next level because the NCAA dragged the situation out intentionally to rule after they left? Chambliss and all the other 6th years should have 0 eligibility in the SEC. They're not going to do that because Ole Miss has a good team this year and they need as many teams as possible to make money for the conference in playoffs. BS is what it is showing favoritism.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News