- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: There is one defense that works 100% of the time in both CFP and Pro
Posted on 1/8/20 at 2:29 pm to TH03
Posted on 1/8/20 at 2:29 pm to TH03
quote:
That's not his logic at all.
For fricks sake, man, you seriously might be the dumbest person I've seen post here.
Yup, his logic was that I can't compare the 2018 Clemson team to this year's team because a few players are gone. Yet he can compare other teams on LSU's schedule to Clemson, even though all of those teams would be double digit underdogs to Clemson. Amirite?
Posted on 1/8/20 at 2:31 pm to Jabontik
quote:
2018 Clemson coming into Natty: 3 of the top 17 picks in the NFL starting on the D Line
2019 Clemson coming into Natty: 0 NFL picks in this years draft starting on the D Line
Dexter Lawrence didn't play. Wah wah.
XT will be a 1st round pick in 2021. Sucks for Clemson that they have him 1 more year.
Posted on 1/8/20 at 2:31 pm to tigerdoc86
You must be trying to convince yourself how good you are. We know what our team can do and will do, Dr douche
Posted on 1/8/20 at 2:33 pm to TH03
quote:
What in the shite is this?
Here's the actual stats:
LSU: 55/70 (78.5%) 68 total scores (97.1%)
Ohio State: 59/75 (78.6%) 67 total scores (89.3%)
Failed red zone possessions:
LSU: 2
Ohio State: 8
Oh, so you consider FG "finishing"? Lol, my bad. See, I've always thought you had to score TDs to be considered "finishing", and that a FG was a failure for an elite offense. Or did you consider Ohio State's FGs as successful Red Zone drives? lol
So congratulations on having more failures than Ohio State, but unfortunately they scored more RZ TDs and at a higher rate than LSU who "finishes"

This post was edited on 1/8/20 at 2:34 pm
Posted on 1/8/20 at 2:36 pm to tigerdoc86
OSUs red zone failures against Clemson weren’t Clemsons doing. Dobbins dropped 2 passes. If he catches them you lose the game.
Posted on 1/8/20 at 2:42 pm to Hotgin
quote:
Solid troll job sir..
Yeah, gotta give it to him, he is definitely trolling hard.
Dumb as shite but trolling hard

Posted on 1/8/20 at 2:47 pm to tigerdoc86
quote:
So congratulations on having more failures than Ohio State, but unfortunately they scored more RZ TDs and at a higher rate than LSU who "finishes
Is 0.1% really that much of a difference to warrant this post?
Posted on 1/8/20 at 3:01 pm to tigerdoc86
quote:Are you slow or something?
Yet he can compare other teams on LSU's schedule to Clemson, even though all of those teams would be double digit underdogs to Clemson. Amirite?
Using stats and performances from this years teams isn’t the same as citing players (who are no longer playing) and stats from last year you retard.
Keep believing that last years Clemson defense is playing on Monday.

Posted on 1/8/20 at 3:02 pm to Meauxjeaux
Even better. Play ball control offense
Posted on 1/9/20 at 7:39 am to glaucon
quote:
Is 0.1% really that much of a difference to warrant this post?
It is when the posters suggested that OSU's struggles in the RZ will not happen to LSU because "LSU finishes in the RZ". Which is true....but they finish at a lower rate than OSU.
Posted on 1/9/20 at 7:40 am to bhtigerfan
quote:
Are you slow or something?
Using stats and performances from this years teams isn’t the same as citing players (who are no longer playing) and stats from last year you retard.
Keep believing that last years Clemson defense is playing on Monday.
Agreed. Luckily for Clemson the difference makers in the Natty last year were not the ones that left the team. Phew!
Posted on 1/9/20 at 7:49 am to tigerdoc86
quote:
Just to confirm:
Have you watched LSU play this year? Because Ive watched Clemson.
Confirmed. LSU 48 Clemson 27
Posted on 1/9/20 at 7:52 am to rattlebucket
quote:
Have you watched LSU play this year? Because Ive watched Clemson.
Confirmed. LSU 48 Clemson 27
I have. LSU has sadly played 3 1-possession games this year. All of them worse teams than Clemson. Which is why picking Clemson to win is the easy bet.
Posted on 1/9/20 at 7:54 am to tigerdoc86
quote:
LSU will need to score 50 to win this one.
You’re saying Clemson will score 50? Don’t you realize how dangerous crack is?
Posted on 1/9/20 at 7:57 am to tigerdoc86
quote:
I have. LSU has sadly played 3 1-possession games this year.
This proves you didn't watch shite, retard. No team had ball in hand to win the game. LSU was up double digits in all 3 of the games you're referring to and the opponent scored in garbage time. LSU knelt the clock out in all of them.
Even if we play with your retard logic, you had a one score game with fricking UNC. GTFO.
quote:
All of them worse teams than Clemson
Bama is equal or better.
This post was edited on 1/9/20 at 7:58 am
Posted on 1/9/20 at 7:57 am to NOSTRODAMUS
quote:
You’re saying Clemson will score 50? Don’t you realize how dangerous crack is?
Clemson could've set the record for most points scored in a Natty last year on your big brother if the starters had played even a single snap in the 4th quarter. And all of those guys are back.
But nah, this elite LSU defense will hold Clemson to 24.
Posted on 1/9/20 at 7:58 am to TH03
quote:
Bama is equal or better.
Yeah...they said the same thing last year....
UNC would beat Texas by 3 TDs.
Posted on 1/9/20 at 8:00 am to tigerdoc86
quote:
they said the same thing last year....
This ain't last year.
Posted on 1/9/20 at 8:01 am to tigerdoc86
quote:
if the starters had played even a single snap in the 4th quarter.
They played multiple. Lawrence was still throwing passes and etienne was still running.
Since you're king of reading box scores, maybe read the one on that game.
Popular
Back to top
