- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: There is one defense that works 100% of the time in both CFP and Pro
Posted on 1/8/20 at 2:13 pm to tigerdoc86
Posted on 1/8/20 at 2:13 pm to tigerdoc86
quote:
until the game was 37-16 and it was over
Once again you are wrong or lying or both.
Posted on 1/8/20 at 2:13 pm to tigerdoc86
quote:
It's not your fault that they were overrated and you still only beat them by 7.
It's not your fault that your team is over-rated. You'll see Monday night.

Posted on 1/8/20 at 2:13 pm to tigerdoc86
quote:Unless you have the same players across the board, (which you don’t) this is absolutely irrelevant.
Yeah, heard this all before.
2018 Bama coming into Natty: 47.7 PPG, 528 YPG
2019 LSU coming into Natty: 48.9 PPG, 564 YPG
Quit living in the past dumbass, this is the present.
Posted on 1/8/20 at 2:14 pm to tigerdoc86
What kind of doctor are you
Posted on 1/8/20 at 2:15 pm to deathvalleytiger10
quote:
Once again you are wrong or lying or both.
Lol, and yet you're too lazy to look at the drive chart to read it and weep.
Posted on 1/8/20 at 2:15 pm to Delacroix22
quote:
What kind of doctor are you
Doctor of Dumbassery, that's for sure.
Posted on 1/8/20 at 2:16 pm to tigerdoc86
quote:
Lol, and yet you're too lazy to look at the drive chart to read it and weep.

Posted on 1/8/20 at 2:17 pm to bhtigerfan
quote:
Unless you have the same players across the board, (which you don’t) this is absolutely irrelevant.
Quit living in the past dumbass, this is the present.
By that logic, using any past games your team played this year against teams that don't have Clemson's current players cannot, and shall not, be used for any analysis on the game. That makes for pretty lame pre-game smack talk doesn't it?
Posted on 1/8/20 at 2:18 pm to tigerdoc86
quote:
By that logic, using any past games your team played this year against teams that don't have Clemson's current players cannot, and shall not, be used for any analysis on the game
That's not his logic at all.
For fricks sake, man, you seriously might be the dumbest person I've seen post here.
Posted on 1/8/20 at 2:19 pm to tigerdoc86
It was 31-16 at half. Bama got the ball first and turned the ball over on downs inside the red zone.
GFY.
GFY.
Posted on 1/8/20 at 2:20 pm to tigerdoc86
quote:
So the 2 defenses that compared most similarly to Clemson were UGA and Auburn. LSU averaged 30 and 495 against those 2 teams. 23 full drive and 7 total TDs for a TD% of 30%. I would expect something pretty similar in the Natty.
You have to really split hairs to make a case based on the numbers that Clemson looks like the favorite. Also, as has been mentioned, Clemson doesn't have anyone on the line as good as Derrick Brown so yall don't look that much like Auburn (plus seriously even with Brown they were super lucky to only give up 23 based on the near 500 yards of offense they gave up).
Edit: I would also add it isn't like I just excluded the 4th best defense you played when you scored 62 points because it would have been convenient for my argument.
This post was edited on 1/8/20 at 2:23 pm
Posted on 1/8/20 at 2:20 pm to tigerdoc86
quote:
If you actually think OU was the 2nd best offense, then you must think Clemson is the #1 defense.
I do and I do. Because—you know, facts.
Not sure what your point is. ...not hating, just confused.
This post was edited on 1/8/20 at 2:21 pm
Posted on 1/8/20 at 2:21 pm to tigerdoc86
You never commented on UNC.
You cherry pick to fit your narrative.
Monday is going to be so good.
Do come back here when you lose.

You cherry pick to fit your narrative.
Monday is going to be so good.
Do come back here when you lose.

Posted on 1/8/20 at 2:23 pm to tigerdoc86
quote:
Yeah, heard this all before.
2018 Bama coming into Natty: 47.7 PPG, 528 YPG
2019 LSU coming into Natty: 48.9 PPG, 564 YPG
2018 Clemson coming into Natty: 3 of the top 17 picks in the NFL starting on the D Line
2019 Clemson coming into Natty: 0 NFL picks in this years draft starting on the D Line
Posted on 1/8/20 at 2:23 pm to TH03
It would be unrealistic for LSU fans to think we will do to Clemson what we did to OU, but it seems equally silly for Clemson fans to think that 44-16 is a sign of what will happen Monday night.
44-16 was a flukey score in a perfect game for Clemson.
44 was more than they scored in 8 of their games last year. Was Bama the 9th best defense they faced?
Does anyone believe they hold Bama to 16 more than once if that game was played 5 times?
5 teams scored at least 16 against them. Was Bama the 6th best offense they faced?
No. Bama played a really bad game and Clemson played a really good one.
They have to hope that LSU shits the bed Monday night and that Clemson plays significantly better than it did in its last game.
We just have to hope our offense does basically what it's done all year no matter the opponent and that our defense continues playing its best football of the year.
44-16 was a flukey score in a perfect game for Clemson.
44 was more than they scored in 8 of their games last year. Was Bama the 9th best defense they faced?
Does anyone believe they hold Bama to 16 more than once if that game was played 5 times?
5 teams scored at least 16 against them. Was Bama the 6th best offense they faced?
No. Bama played a really bad game and Clemson played a really good one.
They have to hope that LSU shits the bed Monday night and that Clemson plays significantly better than it did in its last game.
We just have to hope our offense does basically what it's done all year no matter the opponent and that our defense continues playing its best football of the year.
Posted on 1/8/20 at 2:24 pm to Nissanmaxima
Should have lost to OSU also.
Posted on 1/8/20 at 2:26 pm to tigerdoc86
quote:
You know who also finished in the Red Zone? Ohio State
59/75 ended in TDs (78.6%)
LSU? 55/75 (73.3%)
Whoopsies.
What in the shite is this?
Here's the actual stats:
LSU: 55/70 (78.5%) 68 total scores (97.1%)
Ohio State: 59/75 (78.6%) 67 total scores (89.3%)
Failed red zone possessions:
LSU: 2
Ohio State: 8
This post was edited on 1/8/20 at 2:27 pm
Posted on 1/8/20 at 2:26 pm to Jabontik
quote:
2018 Clemson coming into Natty: 3 of the top 17 picks in the NFL starting on the D Line
2019 Clemson coming into Natty: 0 NFL picks in this years draft starting on the D Line
This all day.
Posted on 1/8/20 at 2:29 pm to TH03
quote:
quote:
You know who also finished in the Red Zone? Ohio State
59/75 ended in TDs (78.6%)
LSU? 55/75 (73.3%)
Whoopsies.
What in the shite is this?
Here's the actual stats:
LSU: 55/70 (78.5%) 68 total scores (97.1%)
Ohio State: 59/75 (78.6%) 67 total scores (89.3%)
Failed red zone possessions:
LSU: 2
Ohio State: 8
Thanks TH03 for owning him once again. This newbie keeps giving BS stats.

Popular
Back to top
