- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/31/25 at 1:10 pm to Lester Earl
He broke the plane Lester. TD all day. And that was before his knee hit the pylon.
Posted on 8/31/25 at 1:11 pm to Biggiebam
insane that you still think that is the contention.
Posted on 8/31/25 at 1:12 pm to Tiger1988
quote:
fricking POOLAME - BAMMER FAN. fricking leave dumbass
Be nice
Posted on 8/31/25 at 1:12 pm to Biggiebam
the rule is different for a ball carrier than a receiver
Posted on 8/31/25 at 1:12 pm to Lester Earl
Lmao dude you must be smoking some good shite. The rules are set. He wasn’t going to the ground when catch was made. Pretty straight forward. After catch was made he crossed the plane. Then goes out of bounds. How hard is that to understand?
Posted on 8/31/25 at 1:13 pm to wesman21
quote:
Was the call completely at the discretion of Daniel Gautreaux? Did any of the other crew members get to have their input? What about those pumping the video feed to him?
He didn't make the call, replay did.
I would think by now people would understand how replay works.
Posted on 8/31/25 at 1:15 pm to Biggiebam
in your opinion, would this play be treated the same if he fell to the ground afterward?


This post was edited on 8/31/25 at 1:16 pm
Posted on 8/31/25 at 1:16 pm to Lester Earl
Send me a link. I never seen this play.
Posted on 8/31/25 at 1:17 pm to Biggiebam
he taps 1 foot in and falls. Simple question
Posted on 8/31/25 at 1:18 pm to Lester Earl
Every show today has said it was a TD, also one pointed out the catch in the Ohio State game where the ground clearly helped the catch was called a TD.
Every show also pointed out the TD rule, which alone makes it a td and the ground cannot cause a fumble rule, the catch rule etc.
The ball is dead after crossing the goal line in a player's hand.
Every show also pointed out the TD rule, which alone makes it a td and the ground cannot cause a fumble rule, the catch rule etc.
The ball is dead after crossing the goal line in a player's hand.
Posted on 8/31/25 at 1:20 pm to tigger1
quote:
The ball is dead after crossing the goal line in a player's hand.
No it's not. That is not why people are saying it should have been a catch. Have y'all watched a football game before?
Posted on 8/31/25 at 1:21 pm to Lester Earl
So you’re comparing that to Barion’s? If he had one foot in. And completed the requirements. Which he wasn’t going to the ground. He jumped up had possession one foot in. That’s a TD all day too. They called that back aswell?
Posted on 8/31/25 at 1:23 pm to Biggiebam
Speaking of that play. Anybody else notice how wide open Anderson was in the middle of the field. Absolutely smoked his DB and had no safety in coverage.
Posted on 8/31/25 at 1:23 pm to choupiquesushi
quote:
the rule is different for a ball carrier than a receiver
True! HOWEVER, the contention by most of us and the ABC official consult guy is that he WAS a ball carrier when he made a football move. He took multiple steps, hit the pylon which that and of itself should have made anything after that dead, and thus he WAS a ball carrier. The STUPID rule is designed for guys making diving catches where he has not made a football move. Anyone who thinks that the overturn was the correct call is WRONG! The announcers would disagree, the official on the field would disagree, and the ABC hired official disagreed. The person who disagreed was the CLOWN in Birmingham, AL who was probably eating Cheetos and drinking a Diet Pepsi....wait, do we know what John Chavis is doing these days?
Posted on 8/31/25 at 1:24 pm to Biggiebam
See Lance Moore superbowl
Posted on 8/31/25 at 1:25 pm to Biggiebam
An argument I don’t see anyone making is the fact that this would have been ruled a catch on the 50 yard line — ball is allowed to touch the ground in the process of a catch as long as you possess it. Ruling on the field was a catch… Barion stretched the ball over the pylon & had it firmly between two hands when he hit the ground.
If Bower’s play was ruled a catch/fumble, this is a catch by the same logic.
If Bower’s play was ruled a catch/fumble, this is a catch by the same logic.
Posted on 8/31/25 at 1:26 pm to jctiger73
If you make 2 steps and football move, does the ground cause a fumble or incomplete pass??
This post was edited on 8/31/25 at 1:26 pm
Posted on 8/31/25 at 1:26 pm to wesman21
quote:The white has ZERO say so in whether that is a catch or touchdown.
Was the call completely at the discretion of Daniel Gautreaux?
after a pass is thrown white hat better not take his eyes off the QB
Posted on 8/31/25 at 1:27 pm to Biggiebam
quote:
Which he wasn’t going to the ground. He jumped up had possession one foot in. That’s a TD all day too.
So if he falls down and the ball gets dislodged and bounces away, it is still a catch?
Popular
Back to top


2


