Favorite team:LSU 
Location:Saint Martinville
Biography:
Interests:Football
Occupation:Army 12N
Number of Posts:340
Registered on:1/8/2018
Online Status:
 Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: So now we can run the ball?

Posted by Biggiebam on 11/15/25 at 3:50 pm to
Did you not watch the La Tech game?

re: Can someone explain what Bama did

Posted by Biggiebam on 11/10/25 at 6:34 am to
I don’t even know if we even call progession plays cause it takes so long for our receivers to even get separation. By that time the OL is already on their heels. It’s honestly impressive how bad these coaches are.We can still get the ball out quick without screens. We can still push the ball down field. They refuse to try anything else. Even though Aaron Anderson can beat anyone on slants. We always go away from what works. It’s so bad we still called screens when they were ready for it and refuse to get Nuss or MVB in rhythm. That’s the problem. Not to mention the run game.
Kyle Parker. He already motions in for run blocking why not scheme him into that RPO?

re: I just need some hope

Posted by Biggiebam on 9/14/25 at 9:41 am to
I agree at least go out with something positive at the end.

re: I just need some hope

Posted by Biggiebam on 9/14/25 at 9:31 am to
I think it starts with Sloan. He continues to be predictable. Outside of a select few times in Clemson. Nuss’s body language after that interception in my opinion says it all about the offense. Even though it was a bone head play and shouldn’t have been thrown. I think he’s frustrated too. You can just tell. His Oline can’t hold blocks for the run game. His oline can’t hold a block for more then 1.5 seconds at times. He’s getting hit as he’s throwing. And miscommunication from the other players aswell. They can trust the process all they want but you have to trust your OC. And I think the offense really question his abilities just my opinion they look sluggish out of the gate every game. Dont get me started on Brad Davis.
I watched some plays where green was supposed to chip or the RB. And they whiffed on the chip so I dont put all the blame on Davis. The only people who want to block are the WRs. Which is crazy to me. The OL plays so soft. They need to simplify the blocking scheme asap. But to see Chester in the back field no matter if it’s a pass or run is inexcusable. Put a freshman in at this point.

re: The overturn

Posted by Biggiebam on 8/31/25 at 1:59 pm to
Okay buddy.

re: The overturn

Posted by Biggiebam on 8/31/25 at 1:56 pm to
Lester either way he survived the ground. Anything otherwise is just smoking crack whether he wasn’t a ball carrier or not he survived the ground. It’s not even a question everyone agrees it was a TD. Only a select few think it’s not. I don’t know if you’re trying to rage bait but it’s not working.

re: The overturn

Posted by Biggiebam on 8/31/25 at 1:21 pm to
So you’re comparing that to Barion’s? If he had one foot in. And completed the requirements. Which he wasn’t going to the ground. He jumped up had possession one foot in. That’s a TD all day too. They called that back aswell?

re: The overturn

Posted by Biggiebam on 8/31/25 at 1:16 pm to
Send me a link. I never seen this play.

re: The overturn

Posted by Biggiebam on 8/31/25 at 1:12 pm to
Lmao dude you must be smoking some good shite. The rules are set. He wasn’t going to the ground when catch was made. Pretty straight forward. After catch was made he crossed the plane. Then goes out of bounds. How hard is that to understand?

re: The overturn

Posted by Biggiebam on 8/31/25 at 1:10 pm to
He broke the plane Lester. TD all day. And that was before his knee hit the pylon.

re: The overturn

Posted by Biggiebam on 8/31/25 at 1:06 pm to
He wasn’t going out of bounds. He met the requirements prior to that anyways. He wasn’t going to the ground. He may have been off balanced. If he were to dive while catching the ball and that happened then YES it’s incomplete. He wasn’t going to the ground when the catch was made. He was in stride caught the ball broke the plane then went out of bounds while going to the ground.

re: The overturn

Posted by Biggiebam on 8/31/25 at 12:57 pm to
He met all the requirements it would be a catch prior to the ground. He crossed the plane prior to the ground. I can post the requirements if you’d like.

A completed catch requires all of the following in this order:

a. Secure firm control of a live ball in flight using hand(s) or arm(s) before the ball touches the ground.

b. Touch the ground inbounds with any part of the body.

c. Maintain control long enough to make an act common to the game (e.g., pitch or hand the ball, advance it, ward off a defender, etc.).

d. Satisfy Subsections b, c, and d.


Love to hear your thoughts.

re: The overturn

Posted by Biggiebam on 8/31/25 at 12:43 pm to
He met all requirements prior to going to the ground. He wasn’t going to the ground when he attempted to catch the ball. Therefore he’s a ball carrier and the surviving the ground or ball touching the ground doesn’t apply. If he were to dive and attempt to catch I could see that being incomplete. And that’s after he hit the pylon first and ball crossing the plane. Even if those did apply he had control.

re: The overturn

Posted by Biggiebam on 8/31/25 at 12:32 pm to
If the player already has firm control and keeps that control even though the ball subsequently contacts the ground (while still controlled), and the other requirements are met, the catch stands.

re: The overturn

Posted by Biggiebam on 8/31/25 at 12:31 pm to
If he keeps control and the ball hits the pylon/crosses the plane before going out of bounds, then he completed the catch and became a ball carrier who scored.

re: The overturn

Posted by Biggiebam on 8/31/25 at 12:26 pm to
Then correct me if I’m wrong. Would love to hear your insight bub

re: The overturn

Posted by Biggiebam on 8/31/25 at 12:13 pm to
He’s no longer a receiver Lester. He did all 3 by the time he hits the grown after the pylon and crossed the plain. Either way it would be a dead and a TD. The catch rules wouldn’t be applied. He’s a ball carrier. Watch it again he had possession with one foot down made a football move. Knee hits pylon. Then goes out of bounds. Clear as day a ball carrier. Even then it survives the ground. If you wanna go that route.

re: The overturn

Posted by Biggiebam on 8/31/25 at 12:08 pm to
I agree with you either way but prior to that it was a catch already by rule. So that no longer applies. He’s a ball carrier once he catches it. Touchdown regardless.