Started By
Message

re: The Official BCS Thread for October 18th: LSU ranked No. 9

Posted on 10/18/09 at 3:20 pm to
Posted by lsumatt
Austin
Member since Feb 2005
12812 posts
Posted on 10/18/09 at 3:20 pm to
LSU is probably #8 then
Posted by floridatigers
orlando
Member since Jan 2008
37 posts
Posted on 10/18/09 at 3:39 pm to
LSU #9
Posted by JackTMed
Member since Jan 2004
3210 posts
Posted on 10/18/09 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

Go post that shite in another thread!



Joking. See third sentence of entire thread.
Posted by SPEEDY
2005 Tiger Smack Poster of the Year
Member since Dec 2003
83346 posts
Posted on 10/18/09 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

How is USC ahead of LSU?
LSU Beat Washington.
USC Loss to Washington.



Annnnnnnnnnnnnnnd here we go
This post was edited on 10/18/09 at 3:49 pm
Posted by JPLSU1981
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
26234 posts
Posted on 10/18/09 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

TCU











Posted by lsumatt
Austin
Member since Feb 2005
12812 posts
Posted on 10/18/09 at 3:50 pm to
A reminder: As long as Iowa or Texas lose a game, LSU probably controls its own destiny
Posted by LSUbacchus81
Hammond
Member since Aug 2007
1981 posts
Posted on 10/18/09 at 3:50 pm to
yep
Posted by Tiger Phil
I see burnt orange everywhere
Member since Nov 2007
1585 posts
Posted on 10/18/09 at 4:16 pm to
IF Iowa and Texas are undefeated...

LSU and USC with 1 loss...

Who finishes 1&2?
Posted by lsumatt
Austin
Member since Feb 2005
12812 posts
Posted on 10/18/09 at 4:19 pm to
Texas and Iowa
Posted by Tiger Phil
I see burnt orange everywhere
Member since Nov 2007
1585 posts
Posted on 10/18/09 at 4:23 pm to
Unless, I suppose, that LSU got some extra mileage out of beating previously unbeaten Alabama and previously unbeaten Florida from the pollsters.

Iowa's non conference slate is very unimpressive.
Posted by lsumatt
Austin
Member since Feb 2005
12812 posts
Posted on 10/18/09 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

Iowa's non conference slate is very unimpressive.


Nah, Iowa is fine.
Posted by JPLSU1981
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
26234 posts
Posted on 10/18/09 at 4:35 pm to
I don't think it's as clear-cut as that...there would definitely be strong support for putting a 1-loss SEC champ into the BCSCG over an undefeated Iowa.... Gary Danielson is no "BCS guru" but he said the same thing himself yesterday. His order of preferential treatment was:

1. Undefeated SEC Champ
2. Undefeated Texas team
3. 1-loss SEC Champ
4. Undefeated Iowa
5. 1-loss USC (can't remember exactly where he had this, he may have had this above Iowa, can't remember)


not saying it would happen (and it will probably be a moot point in the end), but it would be pretty close one way or another when the final numbers come in.
This post was edited on 10/18/09 at 4:41 pm
Posted by PinevilleTiger
Pineville, LA
Member since Sep 2005
6206 posts
Posted on 10/18/09 at 4:40 pm to
Are you sure we're behind TCU??? We should be #8 according to my public school math??
Posted by lsumatt
Austin
Member since Feb 2005
12812 posts
Posted on 10/18/09 at 4:44 pm to
Gary danielson doesn't really know what he is talking about
Posted by bigt41
Member since Nov 2008
3484 posts
Posted on 10/18/09 at 4:48 pm to
How is USC #4 in the Harris
Posted by PinevilleTiger
Pineville, LA
Member since Sep 2005
6206 posts
Posted on 10/18/09 at 4:50 pm to
What is Iowa's remaining schedule??? Can we really afford to have another sorry, slow, unskilled Big 10 team get crushed in the MNC game without the BCS losing all credibility??
Posted by lsumatt
Austin
Member since Feb 2005
12812 posts
Posted on 10/18/09 at 5:00 pm to
Gary danielson doesn't really know what he is talking about
Posted by JPLSU1981
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
26234 posts
Posted on 10/18/09 at 5:07 pm to
I still think there would be a strong push to put a 1-loss SEC champ into the game over an undefeated Iowa...

I think that goes without saying really. There's actually no question in my mind that it would be pretty close. IMO, the SECCG would probably put the victor over the top of Iowa, definitely in the computers and also there is a decent chance it would push the SEC champion over in the human polls as well... likely all it would take is one of the two human polls to rank the SEC champ over Iowa, given the SEC champ would probably already have the computer edge.

It most certainly is not "clear cut" that an undefeated Iowa would go ahead of a 1-loss SEC team. That's my main point ... it would be close, and there would certainly be lots of talking heads making arguments both ways.
This post was edited on 10/18/09 at 5:17 pm
Posted by los angeles tiger
1,601 miles from Tiger Stadium
Member since Oct 2003
55976 posts
Posted on 10/18/09 at 5:25 pm to
quote:

Dude, you know LSU is gonna lose three more games right?


Since you already know this, please give your tickets away to the games.
Posted by lsumatt
Austin
Member since Feb 2005
12812 posts
Posted on 10/18/09 at 5:30 pm to
quote:

It most certainly is not "clear cut" that an undefeated Iowa would go ahead of a 1-loss SEC team.


Yes it is. Iowa would be ahead in the computers (in fact, they might be ahead of undefeated Texas in the computers). And the voters would NOT want to leave out an undefeated BCS school unless there is a compelling case. Cincinnati has the only realistic chance of being left out, and that will likely be because of their computer score.

1-loss LSU would be the only SEC team that could be "close" and even they easily get left out for Iowa.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram