- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The balk call was correct
Posted on 5/25/24 at 6:47 pm
Posted on 5/25/24 at 6:47 pm
Umps got it right. Neal should have waited for the ball to cross the plate. Take off your P&G glasses for once.
27
Posted on 5/25/24 at 6:48 pm to Breauxfessor
It wasn’t a balk. Catchers interference was the call
Posted on 5/25/24 at 6:48 pm to Breauxfessor
How many down votes are you looking for? He didn’t touch the plate nor was he in front of the plate when the ball was received. You are incorrect.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 6:48 pm to Breauxfessor
Oh man, you're so cool and edgy disagreeing with everyone except the umps 
Posted on 5/25/24 at 6:48 pm to Breauxfessor
Catcher was never on or in front of the plate
Posted on 5/25/24 at 6:49 pm to Breauxfessor
Wrong. Neal is not allowed to be on, or in front of the plate without the ball. Show me where this happened. You can’t and neither can the SEC.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 6:49 pm to Breauxfessor
It sicks balls to have something like that play happen, but it was correct.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 6:49 pm to Breauxfessor
Someone here isn’t a real LSU fan.
Hint: It’s the OP.
Hint: It’s the OP.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 6:50 pm to Breauxfessor
Sure, but What about the rule where the batter can't leave the box mid pitch??
Take off your Birmingham bootlicking glasses
Take off your Birmingham bootlicking glasses
Posted on 5/25/24 at 6:50 pm to MarciMoshes
quote:
MarciMoshes
Look who’s back to show off how dumb he can be.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 6:51 pm to HighRoller
quote:
It wasn’t a balk. Catchers interference was the call
it's both a balk and catcher's interference
quote:
If, on an attempted squeeze play or steal of home plate, the catcher steps on
or in front of home plate without possession of the ball or touches the batter or the bat, the pitcher shall be charged with a balk and the catcher with interference
Posted on 5/25/24 at 6:51 pm to Breauxfessor
That’s completely incorrect on your part. Why wasn’t it called right away then?
Also, why wasn’t the very first infraction, the batter stepping out of the box called?
Also, why wasn’t the very first infraction, the batter stepping out of the box called?
Posted on 5/25/24 at 6:51 pm to Breauxfessor
Posted on 5/25/24 at 6:51 pm to Breauxfessor
Go buy you a book “baseball for dummies”.. you’re in dire need… that or stick to Tee ball…
Posted on 5/25/24 at 6:51 pm to Breauxfessor
What about the batter stepping out of the box during the pitch.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 6:52 pm to Breauxfessor
quote:
Umps got it right. Neal should have waited for the ball to cross the plate. Take off your P&G glasses for once.
You people are so fricking hard headed.
You have no idea what you are talking about but you make statements like they are fact.
You obviously don't even know the fricking rule you so matter of factly dispute.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 6:52 pm to Breauxfessor
quote:
Umps got it right. Neal should have waited for the ball to cross the plate. Take off your P&G glasses for once.
You’re an obvious paid shill for the SEC home office. What a sad job to have.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 6:53 pm to Breauxfessor
Another one of these? Jesus, no, it was NOT the correct call. It has been diagnosed and broken down. The umpires correctly followed the rule penalty, but the rule itself was not broken.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 6:53 pm to Breauxfessor
quote:
Umps got it right. Neal should have waited for the ball to cross the plate. Take off your P&G glasses for once.
You should have been put on a towel.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 6:53 pm to Nutriaitch
quote:
it's both a balk and catcher's interference
quote:If, on an attempted squeeze play or steal of home plate, the catcher steps on or in front of home plate without possession of the ball or touches the batter or the bat, the pitcher shall be charged with a balk and the catcher with interference
Well, since Neal didn’t touch the plate or step in front of it, thanks for proving us right.
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News