Started By
Message

re: The Advocate - "Man in bar fight accused of stalking ex gf"

Posted on 8/25/11 at 4:23 pm to
Posted by TigerKnights
Member since Jun 2011
4404 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

SIAP, but the ex-gf stalker and the Marine are two different individuals.


I knew he wasn't the one seriously injured, but I wasn't sure if he was the marine or not. I assumed since everyone called him that it must have been stated somewhere. Go figure them being wrong.
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

hence the reason for seeking 3rd party witnesses


they have 3rd party witnesses.

my point was you are making assumptions on who said what. We do know they have 3rd party witnesses.

Posted by tiger91
In my own little world
Member since Nov 2005
40230 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 4:24 pm to
Is Lowery the Marine or not?

Lowery IS the ex boyfriend.
Posted by JPLSU1981
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
28424 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 4:25 pm to
Lowery is the Marine and x-girlfriend stalker. Lowery is NOT the one that has the fractured vertebrae though.

It's possible one of the other three "victims" is also a Marine, but Lowery is definitely a Marine and Lowery definitely has a TRO against him for stalking his x-girlfriend.
This post was edited on 8/25/11 at 4:26 pm
Posted by pdxlsufan
Beaverton, Oregon
Member since May 2008
3226 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

SIAP, but the ex-gf stalker and the Marine are two different individuals.


Wrong.

quote:

Elizabeth B. Siadous, 18, says in a petition for protection from abuse that on the night of Aug. 18, her ex-boyfriend, Andrew Lowery, 21, followed her to a bar, cursed and yelled at her, cornered her several times and hit one of her friends.


quote:

According to the report, the officer came into contact with a man named Andrew Lowery. Lowery is enlisted in the Marine Reserves but was not in uniform on the night of the incident.



This post was edited on 8/25/11 at 4:26 pm
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

TigerKnights


why are taking up for a lying, thieving, woman beater?
Posted by tigerfan1
Member since Jan 2007
1762 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 4:26 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/25/11 at 6:20 pm
Posted by tiger91
In my own little world
Member since Nov 2005
40230 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 4:27 pm to
Thanks JP & pdx ... these other 2 posters are trying to confuse the crap out of me.

We don't know the name of vertebrae guy though do we?
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

they have 3rd party witnesses.

my point was you are making assumptions on who said what. We do know they have 3rd party witnesses.


very biased 3rd party witnesses
Posted by TigerKnights
Member since Jun 2011
4404 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 4:27 pm to
Wow, you need to grow up kid.

quote:

But they didn't give statements like you insinuated.


When you say something it is generally called a statement. I never said they had full accounts detailed in the report.

quote:

Nope. I'm just punching keys aimlessly hoping to convey my thoughts.


It would appear.

quote:

You insinuated that the officer talked to them based off of the report.


No, I didn't, but thanks for telling me what I meant though.

quote:

So the employees are suppose to be outside while they are working? If not then how would they know who was involved and if it had anything to do with what happened earlier.


Mostly because the officer would ask did anything unusual or out of the ordinary occur tonight. Or when asked they would have said something like I didn't see the fight, but you know there was this kid that got kicked out earlier. Not impossible that it would have been skipped over, but unlikely.
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
36338 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 4:28 pm to
quote:

my point was you are making assumptions on who said what.


I assume you are talking about something Choctaw said.
Posted by crimsonsaint
Member since Nov 2009
37835 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

Now you're just being silly.


Talk about being silly. Your thread this morning was full of awesome.

LINK
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

I knew he wasn't the one seriously injured, but I wasn't sure if he was the marine or not. I assumed since everyone called him that it must have been stated somewhere. Go figure them being wrong.







go figure you agreeing with the first person that posts something that fits your agenda and still being wrong.

the stalker and the marine ARE the same person
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

I assume you are talking about something Choctaw said.



nope.

There are third party witnesses. BRPD has there names and statements.
Posted by dke2
dauphin island
Member since Mar 2011
1710 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 4:30 pm to
the blonde witness claims jefferson kicked lowrey, not the guy with the broken bones. She says she saw jeff kick him in the face
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
36338 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

Its the dude with the vertebrae that is important so why is everyone stuck on the psycho guy as being the key to this mess?


He's the one that filed the initial police complaint.
Posted by LSUdm21
Member since Nov 2008
17486 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

I knew he wasn't the one seriously injured, but I wasn't sure if he was the marine or not. I assumed since everyone called him that it must have been stated somewhere. Go figure them being wrong.


They're the same person dipshit.
Posted by LSUdm21
Member since Nov 2008
17486 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

they have 3rd party witnesses.


Why did they say they didn't just yesterday?
Posted by TigerKnights
Member since Jun 2011
4404 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

why are taking up for a lying, thieving, woman beater?


I'm not. Lowery is a complete POS. I'm just saying we don't know all the facts of what happened. If he didn't deserve a beating then he didn't deserve it no matter his character. I also don't think the other 3 men are in any way connected to him. If it comes out they are all connected and JJ is a hero then frick em and JJ for heisman.
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 4:31 pm to
quote:

Mostly because the officer would ask did anything unusual or out of the ordinary occur tonight. Or when asked they would have said something like I didn't see the fight, but you know there was this kid that got kicked out earlier. Not impossible that it would have been skipped over, but unlikely.


when did the police officer talk to employees?
Jump to page
Page First 24 25 26 27 28 ... 33
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 26 of 33Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram