Started By
Message

re: Supreme Court Ruling…Possibly the best day of my life.

Posted on 6/21/21 at 6:49 pm to
Posted by Mikethegreattiger
Member since May 2021
177 posts
Posted on 6/21/21 at 6:49 pm to
Pay the school for use of there trademark
Posted by Zarkinletch416
Deep in the Heart of Texas
Member since Jan 2020
8365 posts
Posted on 6/21/21 at 7:04 pm to
I thought the purpose of an athletic scholarship was so that young men (and women) could get a good education at a great university. So with one ruling these dead-beat SCOTUS Justices just turned collegiate athletics into semi-pro pay-for-play feeder programs for the NFL.

Okay, so where do I see this played out in the reduction of my taxes. I don't want to subsidize athletic scholarships for semi-pro "collegiate" athletes.

The irony of it all. The SCOTUS Justices refused to hear cases in which the Secretary of State of a number of swing states refused to follow the election laws laid down by their own legislature. Resulting in cheat-by-mail, ballot harvesting, and ballot dumps at 4:00 am in the morning. But the whissy-washy SCOTUS Judges have no qualms when it comes to sticking their nose in NCAA Sports.

What a fricking mess.

This post was edited on 6/22/21 at 7:52 am
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
53768 posts
Posted on 6/21/21 at 7:08 pm to
I am okay with an allowance of some kind for poor students athletes

but paying them?

the get coached, they get trained, they get on TV with LSU brand to make a name for themselves

the top players get paid bigly...after college

that's how this works

now the coaches have to deal with fairness which will create problems we don't need

Posted by dcrews
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2011
30162 posts
Posted on 6/21/21 at 7:16 pm to
quote:

You do know they already announced a new one is coming, right?


I haven't stopped beating off since I heard the news
Posted by dguidry
Member since Feb 2009
424 posts
Posted on 6/21/21 at 7:22 pm to
quote:


I thought the purpose of an athletic scholarship was so that young men (and women) could get a good education at a great university. So with one ruling these dead-beat SCOTUS Justices just turned collegiate athletics into semi-pro pay-for-play feeder programs for the NFL.

Okay, so where do I see this played out in the reduction of my taxes. I don't want to subsidize athletic scholarships for semi-pro "collegiate" athletes.

The irony of it all. The SCOTUS Justices refused to hear cases in which the Secretary of State of a number of swing states refused to follow the election laws laid down by their own legislature. Resulting in Cheat-by-Mail and Ballot Harvesting and Ballot Dumps at 4:00 am in the morning. But the whissy-washy SCOTUS Judges have no qualms when it comes to sticking their nose in NCAA Sports.


You had to turn this into a damn political statement, didn't you? Hail to the chief: PRESIDENT BIDEN
This post was edited on 6/21/21 at 9:26 pm
Posted by bgtiger
Prairieville
Member since Dec 2004
11427 posts
Posted on 6/21/21 at 7:46 pm to
quote:

PREDIDENT BIDEN


Yep lmao

Hail to the queef
Posted by CDawson
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2017
16389 posts
Posted on 6/21/21 at 9:29 pm to
quote:

I will never complain about paying players neither should any professed LSU fan.


That’s all good but you can’t have it both ways. When money goes to players (not saying it should or should not) it doesn’t go to facilities and other large expenditure projects. The cut or portion players are paid is at the expense of all other sports and projects.

I don’t see how current programs and budgets survive if player payments become the norm.
Posted by LSUstephen17
Houston
Member since Aug 2010
13112 posts
Posted on 6/21/21 at 11:38 pm to
quote:

I will never complain about paying players neither should any professed LSU fan.


Screw yourself it’s going to ruin the game
Posted by ifyouonlyknew
Jackson,Mississippi
Member since Oct 2015
336 posts
Posted on 6/22/21 at 4:58 am to
Sounds like this is going to have a pretty big effect on college baseball.
Posted by ifyouonlyknew
Jackson,Mississippi
Member since Oct 2015
336 posts
Posted on 6/22/21 at 5:26 am to
No SEC school is hurting for money.Looking at the top 100 revenue chart from 2019...Missouri #37 with 106 million,Ole Miss was #34 with 108,Miss State #30 with 112,and Arkansas #20 with 137.

Now these schools are not LSU a school in the top 10 in revenue with 157 but that's a ton of money those schools brought in.
Posted by Zarkinletch416
Deep in the Heart of Texas
Member since Jan 2020
8365 posts
Posted on 6/22/21 at 6:34 am to
quote:

You had to turn this into a damn political statement, didn't you? Hail to the chief: PRESIDENT BIDEN


Everything is political NOW because you Biden people turned everything political. By the way, I still don't want to subsidize athletic scholarships or College Athletic Programs for semi-pro collegiate athletes. There I said it again.

Hail to the real chief: DONALD J. TRUMP.

Now reflect on this.....

Stolen elections have consequences.



This post was edited on 6/22/21 at 6:37 am
Posted by Gus007
TN
Member since Jul 2018
11957 posts
Posted on 6/22/21 at 6:47 am to
The court had to step in.
An amateur organization, turned into a multimillion dollar business decades ago, but refused to pay their labor.
Posted by timlan2057
In the Shadow of Tiger Stadium
Member since Sep 2005
16758 posts
Posted on 6/22/21 at 6:49 am to
Lol.

You obviously don’t have much of a life.
Posted by dguidry
Member since Feb 2009
424 posts
Posted on 6/22/21 at 6:55 am to
Harvard University (MA) $40,929,700,000 2
Yale University (CT) $30,295,003,000 4 (tie)
Stanford University (CA) $27,699,834,000 6 (tie)
Princeton University (NJ) $25,623,600,000 1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology $17,443,750,000 4 (tie)
University of Pennsylvania $14,649,761,000 8
Texas A&M University $12,632,092,945 66 (tie)
University of Michigan—Ann Arbor $12,273,834,000 24 (tie)
University of Notre Dame (IN) $11,565,964,000 19
Columbia University (NY) $10,950,738,000 3

LSU $546.02 million This is why LSU is fricked under this new scheme of athletic operations. More NCAA restrictions will fall given the precedent set by this case. Those rankings are of the college’s prestige and standing in academics. My two daughters graduated from Columbia and one played volleyball there. I’m not saying any of the Ivies will jump ship and become independents like Notre Dame, etc., but they all have the financial ability to do so and to compete for the best athelets, but its possible. I’m more worried about Texas A & M out pacing LSU given the disparity in their endowment balances.
This post was edited on 6/22/21 at 6:58 am
Posted by bgtiger
Prairieville
Member since Dec 2004
11427 posts
Posted on 6/22/21 at 7:46 am to
They aren’t going to spend endowment money on this. Good lord
Posted by Dragula
Laguna Seca
Member since Jun 2020
4856 posts
Posted on 6/22/21 at 7:51 am to
quote:

Supreme Court Ruling…Possibly the best day of my life.


That's pretty sad, actually..
Posted by 1badboy
In space
Member since Jul 2014
8103 posts
Posted on 6/22/21 at 9:14 am to
If they pay players in college, only the rick university's will have good teams! Ruin sports, Bama has been doing this for years !!!
Posted by cyarrr
Prairieville
Member since Jun 2017
3315 posts
Posted on 6/22/21 at 11:31 am to
quote:

Possibly the best day of my life.


Are you an athlete?

I'm wondering why this was the best day of your life.
Posted by MikeTheTiger58
Greenwell Springs
Member since Apr 2012
579 posts
Posted on 6/22/21 at 1:20 pm to
Go look at the club system in Europe. That is the future.
And, good luck on you greatest day. How many games are released for minor league / club sports.
The current system basically funds 95% of college athletics by not paying the 5% what the market would bear while maintaining their status as "charitable tax free" organizations.
Once a true professional model is introduced to "college" sports, the current athletic departments will be split from the universities. There will be no more title IX. No more track and field, tennis, etc. There won't be tax free donations or scholarships. There will simply be minor league professional teams.
I think the top football teams will survive for a while, but how many minor league teams look anything like current college athletics. In the long run, the USA does not support minor leagues very well.
A lot of people have had a chance to go from sharecropper to life long success due to athletic scholarships; while, other people went to school for 4 years and can not read. I suspect that many in the public don't really look at the big picture of the NCAA in spite of all of the adds about people who go on to "jobs outside professional sports".
Posted by Bomont
Member since May 2021
975 posts
Posted on 6/22/21 at 1:25 pm to
A&M still gonna suck
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram