- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 11/25/18 at 8:15 pm to Mo Jeaux
Sternberger slapped ground with both hands after our recovery, he thought he fumbled. Ref couldn't make that call in real time, happened too fat. Replay booth s/h ruled a fumble, game over. He fumbled.
Posted on 11/25/18 at 8:15 pm to Chet Donnely
LSU lost the game, and the replay booth did not see evidence enough to determine that the ruling on the field was incorrect. Hope I didn't post any spoilers.
Posted on 11/25/18 at 8:16 pm to Mo Jeaux
Then they need to get rid of replays, he fumbled and he knew it.
Posted on 11/25/18 at 8:18 pm to Mo Jeaux
Reading comprehension not really your thing. Got it.
Posted on 11/25/18 at 8:18 pm to Mo Jeaux
It’s amazing that you think deciding not to review a play is the same as reviewing it. An official review is way more in depth, it has no time limit like a running play clock, they can go back and forth with different views as many times as they want until they’re comfortable with decision to confirm. There is way more diligence in an official review obviously, and that play was critical and deserved the diligence.
The booth official made a poor decision to not have that play reviewed.
The booth official made a poor decision to not have that play reviewed.
Posted on 11/25/18 at 8:19 pm to tiger81
quote:
Then they need to get rid of replays, he fumbled and he knew it.
This isn't even a cogent thought.
Posted on 11/25/18 at 8:20 pm to The Mick
quote:
It’s amazing that you think deciding not to review a play is the same as reviewing it. An official review is way more in depth, it has no time limit like a running play clock, they can go back and forth with different views as many times as they want until they’re comfortable with decision to confirm. There is way more diligence in an official review obviously, and that play was critical and deserved the diligence.
The booth official made a poor decision to not have that play reviewed.
OK. That's your opinion. Again, if this is the case, why didn't O ask for a review? Was he able to do so?
Posted on 11/25/18 at 8:21 pm to The Mick
Someone please anchor this shite
Tired of looking at it
Tired of looking at it
Posted on 11/25/18 at 8:21 pm to Mo Jeaux
I’m not sure if O was allowed to ask or not. If so then shame on him.
Posted on 11/25/18 at 8:25 pm to Mo Jeaux
What’s your opinion on the play? Do you agree that it wasn’t close enough to call for a review?
Posted on 11/25/18 at 8:27 pm to The Mick
It's pretty simple Mo, wise up. Player who caught it knew he fumbled, and replay booth failed in it's sole purpose for being...we good ?
Posted on 11/25/18 at 8:35 pm to The Mick
YEP...FUMBLE....GAME OVER! LSU Wins 34 - 31 in OT
That was the BIGGEST MISTAKE by Refs IMO
Will NEVER understand WHY that was NOT reviewed??
That was the BIGGEST MISTAKE by Refs IMO
Will NEVER understand WHY that was NOT reviewed??Posted on 11/25/18 at 8:48 pm to RBTiger
Worse part about this play is that it wasn’t even reviewed.
The only controversial play reviewed was the knee play because they knew that was ballgame if they didn’t.
There was at least 5 other plays that should have been reviewed and funny all of them would benefited us.
The only controversial play reviewed was the knee play because they knew that was ballgame if they didn’t.
There was at least 5 other plays that should have been reviewed and funny all of them would benefited us.
Posted on 11/25/18 at 8:52 pm to moock blackjack
LINK
They signal dead ball (which is the same as a whistle)
almost instantly as it's dislodged. It's not something that could have been overturned as to then give LSU possession even if it was a fumble. I presume that's what was communicated to Coach O.
They signal dead ball (which is the same as a whistle)
almost instantly as it's dislodged. It's not something that could have been overturned as to then give LSU possession even if it was a fumble. I presume that's what was communicated to Coach O.
Posted on 11/25/18 at 8:56 pm to The Mick
It was the longest transport of a ball without having possesion in the history of football
Posted on 11/25/18 at 8:59 pm to droliver
quote:Nope. I've looked at it frame by frame. The ref doesnt start his incomplete pass hand signals until just after Greedy picks up the ball. I mean it's a bang bang play so I can't fault the ref for the live call. The replay boys got it wrong.
They signal dead ball (which is the same as a whistle)
almost instantly as it's dislodged.
pic 1 - ball is just outside of Greedy's grasp, ref still at his goal line position hands at his side.
pic 2 - Greedy has the ball and is taking off up the field. Ref is just starting to step towards the play from his goal line spot, he is just about to start his hand signals for incomplete pass. Greedy has possession before any hand signal or whistle occurred.
This post was edited on 11/25/18 at 9:10 pm
Posted on 11/25/18 at 9:32 pm to The Mick
Most definitely a fumble...what chaps my arse more than anything is if LSU farted sideways there was a review...there waan't one on this play...nor there one when one of our TD receptions where our guy came down with both feet in-bounds and total control of the ball and the official close enough to touch him called it incomplete...no review on the interference call on Greedy and the ball was five feet over both their heads
Posted on 11/25/18 at 9:39 pm to kensheila
quote:
no review on the interference call on Greedy and the ball was five feet over both their heads
That's not reviewable.
Posted on 11/25/18 at 9:53 pm to The Mick
The most aggravating about it to me was how earlier in the game when the ball clearly hit the grass and was incomplete the let the ags run it back for a TD then going to review and overturning. Why not do the same for this play instead of calling it incomplete and not reviewable?
Page 8 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News