- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Someone explain to me how that is not interference
Posted on 5/10/24 at 9:39 pm to hall59tiger
Posted on 5/10/24 at 9:39 pm to hall59tiger
Again if the runner would have been closer to actually impacting the receipt of the ball by 1B then it may have been called……that may not be how it’s supposed to work but that’s how people work right or wrong.
One thing is for absolutely sure a good throw would have resulted in an out without interference having to be called.
One thing is for absolutely sure a good throw would have resulted in an out without interference having to be called.
1
Posted on 5/10/24 at 9:39 pm to LSU316
quote:
2-3 feet LOL
He actually was at one point. This is him angling back to the bag. You can say whatever you want but that was 110% interference. That is clearly and abundantly clear
Posted on 5/10/24 at 9:39 pm to LSU316
quote:Either you or these alleged announcers are full of shite lol
God damn it I’m not doing your research for you!!!! Lazy arse.
Doesn't matter because frick those last couple innings but it was absolutely interference by rule
Posted on 5/10/24 at 9:39 pm to LSU316
quote:
you get some leeway on either side of the line.
Learn the rules
Posted on 5/10/24 at 9:41 pm to kc8876
quote:
The runner was running directly on the baseline the entire time and never deviated from it.
This is simply just false.
Posted on 5/10/24 at 9:41 pm to LSU316
It’s remarkable how many people are clamoring for this interference call. Not a single umpire anywhere ever is making that call unless it’s blatant. Which it wasn’t. Milazzo had plenty of room and time to make a good throw.
If Milazzo throws it to the other side of the bag, and we get the third out, not a single fricking one of you frickers is saying “oh and it was interference!” Not a fricking one.
If Milazzo throws it to the other side of the bag, and we get the third out, not a single fricking one of you frickers is saying “oh and it was interference!” Not a fricking one.
Posted on 5/10/24 at 9:42 pm to hall59tiger
That I didn’t see in real time or on replay which does not mean it didn’t happen…..if the runner bowed out onto the infield grass then came back to the base were he crossed it then I’m surprised it wasn’t called either way…..that is an egregious no call of clearly altering the runner’s path to the base. I need to look at it again.
This post was edited on 5/10/24 at 9:44 pm
Posted on 5/10/24 at 9:42 pm to josh336
quote:
Not sure you understand interferenc
I understand it perfectly. It is you who does not, because you don’t understand that the foul line is not necessarily the baseline.
Posted on 5/10/24 at 9:42 pm to LSU316
quote:
Again if the runner would have been closer to actually impacting the receipt of the ball by 1B then it may have been called……that may not be how it’s supposed to work but that’s how people work right or wrong. One thing is for absolutely sure a good throw would have resulted in an out without interference having to be called.
All of this is correct.
There’s the letter of the law and then the spirit of the law. There’s interference and then there’s interference.
Posted on 5/10/24 at 9:43 pm to Cantstandya
Learn to code bitch!
Posted on 5/10/24 at 9:43 pm to LSU316
quote:
you get some leeway on either side of the line.
no you don't
copy and pasted from the Official NCAA Baseball rulebook
quote:
Note 2: The batter-runner is considered outside this 3-foot lane if either foot is outside either line.
Posted on 5/10/24 at 9:43 pm to grizzlylongcut
quote:
Not a single umpire anywhere ever is making that call unless it’s blatant
Hopefully this is ignorance and not just stupidity….
Posted on 5/10/24 at 9:43 pm to josh336
quote:
Someone explain to me how that is not interference
I don't care what the runner is doing, Milazzo had all freaking day to make that play. He calls off Herring to boot. About as bad of a play as you'll see a catcher make.
Posted on 5/10/24 at 9:44 pm to LSU316
quote:
I’d like another look at his path to the base…
There is no base path to first you moron. There is a running lane however, which the runner was not in.
Posted on 5/10/24 at 9:45 pm to Nutriaitch
quote:
if either foot is outside either line.
This suggests 2 lines right….stay with me…..what are they?
This post was edited on 5/10/24 at 9:46 pm
Posted on 5/10/24 at 9:45 pm to MikeBRLA
Not interference just because Jones is scared to catch it.
Posted on 5/10/24 at 9:46 pm to hall59tiger
Did the Alabama player actually interfere with Milazzo making a throw to first?
Posted on 5/10/24 at 9:46 pm to MikeBRLA
quote:
There is a running lane however
What is your opinion of where this might be….a 3in strip of white chalk?
This post was edited on 5/10/24 at 9:47 pm
Posted on 5/10/24 at 9:46 pm to grizzlylongcut
quote:
It’s remarkable how many people are clamoring for this interference call. Not a single umpire anywhere ever is making that call unless it’s blatant
Well this isn’t true. It’s a call made fairly often many times not blatant.
Posted on 5/10/24 at 9:47 pm to grizzlylongcut
quote:
Did the Alabama player actually interfere with Milazzo making a throw to first?
Seems like him completely missing the biggest guy on our team is compelling evidence for just that. Not sure that matters anyway when the baserunner is way way way outside the base path
Page 4 of 8
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News