- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/29/18 at 1:02 pm to Pensacolatgr
I thought it was a pretty legitimate question. Wasn't intended as a knock on O, he's the one who said it. Just wanting to know which it is. 50% or 90%?
Posted on 6/29/18 at 1:04 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:
Those are just formations. The other stuff you're talking about are overall schemes. As I said before, the Shotgun formation is in every offense known to football. It's not a "spread formation", it's a formation that is used by spread systems. The Shotgun formation was around long before anyone ran a spread system
So formations and schemes don’t have anything to do with what type of offense you run?
Posted on 6/29/18 at 1:06 pm to Tiger Ree
"I wish you would have allowed more time for the idiots to expose themselves. It would probably have been 4 or 5 pages of pure brilliance/comedy."
totally agree. there are fools on here who think Ensminger doesn't know how many players are allowed on the field and, better yet, that they know more about football than the coaches. Really, it's everywhere.
totally agree. there are fools on here who think Ensminger doesn't know how many players are allowed on the field and, better yet, that they know more about football than the coaches. Really, it's everywhere.
Posted on 6/29/18 at 1:12 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Formation =\= scheme
He was running Cam’s playbook which was a ProStyle Playbook.
He was just running shotgun sets.
Saying “we were 4 wide so clearly he has run a spread offense” is wrong. You can run 5 wide shotgun plays and still be in a pro style offense.
He was running Cam’s playbook which was a ProStyle Playbook.
He was just running shotgun sets.
Saying “we were 4 wide so clearly he has run a spread offense” is wrong. You can run 5 wide shotgun plays and still be in a pro style offense.
Posted on 6/29/18 at 1:12 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:
Thanks. I'm gonna have to give it another shot.
It was actually the 8th show that people think may be the best of the series. I edited my original post also.
I thought the last 3 episodes were awesome. The also generated a lot of interest. The thread for the 9th episode is nine pages or more and it seems like 4 or 5 pages are about how a character received a piece of information from another.
Posted on 6/29/18 at 1:13 pm to Tiger Ree
Sammy isn't even worth replying to. Extremely emotional, low iq. A recipe for exactly what kind of poster he is on this site.
Posted on 6/29/18 at 1:15 pm to Tiger Ree
quote:Is your*
Are your one question and one statement
quote:At least I'm smart enough to formulate my own opinion based off of the facts. You just seem to dick ride all the pro O sports writers by posting their work here.
average intelligence
This post was edited on 6/29/18 at 1:16 pm
Posted on 6/29/18 at 1:16 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
Formation =\= scheme He was running Cam’s playbook which was a ProStyle Playbook. He was just running shotgun sets. Saying “we were 4 wide so clearly he has run a spread offense” is wrong. You can run 5 wide shotgun plays and still be in a pro style offense.
Again, you can still run spread plays regardless of what label you gave your playbook lol. I never said Ensminger developed and implemented an entire spread offense. I said he’s called spread plays. Do you really not understand the difference?
Posted on 6/29/18 at 1:16 pm to Tiger_Stripes
quote:No, no. Based on the responses in this thread the 43 Wham means there are 43 players on the field. We'll basically just run 33 fullbacks through the hole with one tailback following. Unstoppable play!
They'll never be able to stop the "43 Wham" if we throw an extra FB in there. 12 players on the field. Genius

Posted on 6/29/18 at 1:19 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
So formations and schemes don’t have anything to do with what type of offense you run?
I'm really not sure any other way to explain it. Georgia Tech is a triple option team that will line up in a Shotgun formation in 3rd and long. Are they running a spread formation? No. It's just a Shotgun.
Maybe this will help, a scheme is a overall philosophy while a formation is just one set way of aligning the players. Just because the players are aligned 4 wide for one play doesn't mean that the team uses a particular philosophy.
Posted on 6/29/18 at 1:21 pm to Mickey Goldmill
We’re all saying just the formation doesn’t make it a spread play. Your eveidence of him running “spread plays” is just him running plays out of the shotgun.
And there are plays that are in both but running a play out of a 4 WR set doesn’t mean you can run a whole Spread System.
And there are plays that are in both but running a play out of a 4 WR set doesn’t mean you can run a whole Spread System.
Posted on 6/29/18 at 1:22 pm to TigerLunatik
Describe what you would call a spread formation for me, please.
Posted on 6/29/18 at 1:24 pm to SammyTiger
I never said he ran a full spread offense. If he is running the same play that a spread offense uses, with the same read and everything, its not a spread play because we had a ‘Pro-style playbook”?
Posted on 6/29/18 at 1:30 pm to Mickey Goldmill
I said He’s never run a spread offense.
You said his first play was out of a 4WR 1 RB formation.
Then called is a spread play. Offering no other evidence as to read or anything else.
Are there plays that overlap? But you can’t use a splay that’s just universal to football as eveidence of running “spread plays”
You said his first play was out of a 4WR 1 RB formation.
Then called is a spread play. Offering no other evidence as to read or anything else.
Are there plays that overlap? But you can’t use a splay that’s just universal to football as eveidence of running “spread plays”
Posted on 6/29/18 at 1:30 pm to Mickey Goldmill
That's the thing, IMO there really isn't a spread formation. The spread is a term used for a scheme, not individual formations.
Posted on 6/29/18 at 1:39 pm to SammyTiger
Single set back
Typical singleback formation
Also known as the "ace" or "singleback" formation, the single set back formation consists of one running back lined up about five yards behind the quarterback. The basic singleback set does not employ a fullback. The other players that are not on the line of scrimmage can either act as tight ends or wide receivers. This formation is normally used for a pass play, but can also be good for running, as defenders must move at least one player out of the middle of the field (the "box", between the tackles on the offensive line) to cover the additional wide receiver or tight end. Since an extra wide receiver is lined up in the space between the tackle or tight end and the outside wide receiver, he is called the slot receiver.
Spread formation
A variation of the ace is known as the spread formation. It utilizes four wide receivers and no tight ends. In the NFL, this formation was the basis of the run and shoot offense that was popular in the 1980s with teams such as the Detroit Lions and the Houston Oilers but has since fallen out of favor as a primary offensive philosophy.
It is often used as a pass formation, because of the extra wide receivers. It also makes an effective run formation, because it "spreads the field" and forces the defense to respect the pass, thus taking players out of the box. Certain college programs, such as the University of Hawaii and Texas Tech still use it as their primary formation. Brigham Young University also uses the spread offense, although they tend to employ their tight ends more frequently than Hawaii and Texas Tech. Minnesota and TCU are also starting to employ the spread offense.
Joe Gibbs's "H-Back" set
Joe Gibbs, twice head coach of the Washington Redskins, devised an ace variation that used a setback, or "flexed" tight end known as an H-back. In this formation, the normal tight-end is almost exclusively a blocker, while the H-back is primarily a pass receiver. This formation is often referred to as a "two tight end" set. Some teams (like the Indianapolis Colts under Tony Dungy) use this formation with both tight ends on the line and use two flankers. Many other teams in the NFL, even those that do not use this as a primary formation, still run some plays using a variant of this formation.
Typical singleback formation
Also known as the "ace" or "singleback" formation, the single set back formation consists of one running back lined up about five yards behind the quarterback. The basic singleback set does not employ a fullback. The other players that are not on the line of scrimmage can either act as tight ends or wide receivers. This formation is normally used for a pass play, but can also be good for running, as defenders must move at least one player out of the middle of the field (the "box", between the tackles on the offensive line) to cover the additional wide receiver or tight end. Since an extra wide receiver is lined up in the space between the tackle or tight end and the outside wide receiver, he is called the slot receiver.
Spread formation
A variation of the ace is known as the spread formation. It utilizes four wide receivers and no tight ends. In the NFL, this formation was the basis of the run and shoot offense that was popular in the 1980s with teams such as the Detroit Lions and the Houston Oilers but has since fallen out of favor as a primary offensive philosophy.
It is often used as a pass formation, because of the extra wide receivers. It also makes an effective run formation, because it "spreads the field" and forces the defense to respect the pass, thus taking players out of the box. Certain college programs, such as the University of Hawaii and Texas Tech still use it as their primary formation. Brigham Young University also uses the spread offense, although they tend to employ their tight ends more frequently than Hawaii and Texas Tech. Minnesota and TCU are also starting to employ the spread offense.
Joe Gibbs's "H-Back" set
Joe Gibbs, twice head coach of the Washington Redskins, devised an ace variation that used a setback, or "flexed" tight end known as an H-back. In this formation, the normal tight-end is almost exclusively a blocker, while the H-back is primarily a pass receiver. This formation is often referred to as a "two tight end" set. Some teams (like the Indianapolis Colts under Tony Dungy) use this formation with both tight ends on the line and use two flankers. Many other teams in the NFL, even those that do not use this as a primary formation, still run some plays using a variant of this formation.
This post was edited on 6/29/18 at 1:39 pm
Posted on 6/29/18 at 1:40 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:
That's the thing, IMO there really isn't a spread formation. The spread is a term used for a scheme, not individual formations.
Agree to disagree. See above.
Posted on 6/29/18 at 2:00 pm to Mickey Goldmill
So, do you consider the Saints and Patriots to run spread or spread formations?
Posted on 6/29/18 at 2:02 pm to Tiger Ree
quote:
am a big fan of the actor that plays the lead native American.
I believe his name is Zahn McClarnon. I've liked his acting in everything I've seen him in.
He was in the second season of Fargo. He did a really good job in that show.
Popular
Back to top



1





