- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So a year long suspension isn't enough for Alleva?
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:14 pm to Tiger Authority
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:14 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
He would? According to the NCAA?
I think at UGA, it is a 2 strike policy.
1
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:14 pm to lsufball19
quote:
what are you talking about? you claimed there was a 4th failed test that we covered up, when there is no evidence to support that.
the frick? No I didn't. Go back and read because you suck at it.
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:14 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
You can continue to repeat your stupid talking point or answer my question. Why should our rules be stricter than every other school in the country and why should he not be allowed to return if he sits a year?
You still don't understand.
It isn't important what any other place does.
The place where he he chose to play has certain well publicised and specific requirements He made the decision to not adhere to these rules. It's not that hard really.
He knew.
He chose his actions.
He has to accepet the consequences.
*edited for spelling
This post was edited on 8/13/12 at 6:18 pm
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:14 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
I think at UGA, it is a 2 strike policy.
You think?
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:15 pm to fastedLSU
quote:
Might as well be 17, the result is the same. He's gone for good
Not according to the one-year ban policy.
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:15 pm to Gray Tiger
quote:
You still don't understand.
It isn't important what any other place does.
The place where he he chose to play has certain well publicised and specific requirements He made the decision to not adhere to these rules. It's not that hard really.
He knew.
He chose his actions.
He has to accpet the consequences.
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:15 pm to fastedLSU
quote:
And he's banned according to NCAA standards of playing next year at another FCS school. He could play the following. LSU should let him play the following if he gets it together and stays. A one-year punishment is sizable.
But they're not. They already ruled. He's GONE. You've defended Miles before and now you're changing your stance bc you don't like the decision.
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:15 pm to fastedLSU
quote:
He's gone for good
You don't know that
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:16 pm to Gray Tiger
quote:
You still don't understand.
It isn't important what any other place does.
The place where he he chose to play has certain well publicised and specific requirements He made the decision to not adhere to these rules. It's not that hard really.
LSU, for failing 3 tests, will not let him play next year. The policy says nothing about sitting out a year and playing the next.
What is so difficult about this for you?
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:16 pm to fastedLSU
quote:
Not according to the one-year ban policy.
But according to the decision it doesn't matter.
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:17 pm to fastedLSU
quote:
But they're not. They already ruled. He's GONE. You've defended Miles before and now you're changing your stance bc you don't like the decision.
They've "ruled?" haha. They can rule him back for 2013 and nothing would stop them from that according to our own internal policy.
Are we even talking about 2013 or are you just clueless and thinking we're talking about 2012?
This post was edited on 8/13/12 at 6:17 pm
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:17 pm to Tiger Authority
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:18 pm to fastedLSU
quote:
You don't know that
Yes I do. He's gone
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:18 pm to TigerBait1127
That would apply to transfers? Or is it just an internal policy? They could accept him there. Just like other schools could according to the NCAA.
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:18 pm to StinkBait72
quote:
So number 2 and 3 are just assumptions and probables? If we're going to assume and throw out "probably" maybe we should just increase the number to 17 to make a cooler story....
So we throw out a bunch of failed tests, and suddenly decide to use this last one to kick him off permanently. In that case, they could just say it's 3, and suspend him fo the year. Hell why not, according to your theory we've been letting him slide anyways.
This doesn't make sense. I agree he messed up. I agree he has a problem. I agree with him not playing next year. If it's more than 3 failed tests, kick him off for good. But why not say that from the beginning.
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:18 pm to Gray Tiger
quote:
You can continue to repeat your stupid talking point or answer my question. Why should our rules be stricter than every other school in the country and why should he not be allowed to return if he sits a year?
Gray, I think a better question to pose to Tiger Authority, is "why should LSU not be allowed to have stricter rules than every other school in the country"?
Is that we've come to as fans of a LSU? We don't want to allow the university to set its' own behavior standards and rules, and expect them to be followed?
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:19 pm to fastedLSU
quote:
Yes I do. He's gone
I love these absolutes without any backdrop that would give me any inclination to believe you or not.
This post was edited on 8/13/12 at 6:20 pm
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:20 pm to Festus
quote:
Gray, I think a better question to pose to Tiger Authority, is "why should LSU not be allowed to have stricter rules than every other school in the country"?
I'll wait for you to show me that stricter policy.
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:20 pm to lsufball19
quote:
but the fact of the matter is that if this was the 4th failed test, he was never punished for the 3rd because he was still on the team and practicing OR this mythical failed test no one heard about never happened and this latest failed test was, in fact, his 3rd.
as the rules read, it looks like a third violation can be appealed. If he won the appeal, then we would have never known about the third. Any subsequent positive tests call for permanent ineligibility. Seems to be to closely resemble what is happening here...
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:20 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
That would apply to transfers? Or is it just an internal policy? They could accept him there. Just like other schools could according to the NCAA.
he could play there. I misunderstood what you had said
Page 6 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News