- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So a year long suspension isn't enough for Alleva?
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:07 pm to TigerBait1127
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:07 pm to TigerBait1127
Yeah is he trying to say reasonable suspicion?
1
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:08 pm to FightOn4ever
quote:
#3 was likely kept off record is a reasonable speculation.
Reasonable huh...please, keep going.
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:08 pm to cas4t
quote:
Google will tell you everything you need to know.
It is very known that it ws drug related. The first incident being last year with synthetic weed.
We don't know about instance 2, meaning it's probably in the off season.
Number 3, we assume through very reasonable context clues given by LSU administration, was what got him kicked off.
LSU policy says 3 tests failed equals suspension for 1 year with the possibility of losing his schoarship.
Please, and I'm trying t be nice, do some research before you come to this board and start spewing off facts.
No links because all you have to do is go to he thread at the very top.
actually #2 was likely the synthetic weed. 1st failed test is a warning. second failed test is a suspension for 15% of games (rounded down) which is where the auburn game came from. third failed test is dismissal for at least an entire year from all athletic activities, which is what happened last week. all these conspiracy theorists are hilarious.
This post was edited on 8/13/12 at 6:09 pm
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:08 pm to Festus
Some people will never realize this.
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:09 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
Just want to make sure I'm clear on your stance
I'll make it clear for you...
The kid was given at least two chances and has done something to blow both of them. (this is assuming last year's suspension was his second offense). He received a great gift from LSU in a free education and a spotlight to show his talent. He did not follow the rules and must now be punished for his actions like a big boy in the real world. I stick by whatever the AD, School, and Coach decides, but it is their choice because he could not make the correct choices on his own.
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:09 pm to lsufball19
quote:
actually #2 was likely the synthetic weed. 1st failed test is a warning. second failed test is a suspension for 15% of games (rounded down) which is where the auburn game came from. third failed test is dismissal for at least an entire year from all athletic activities, which is what happened last week.
So you answered your previous question speculating as to when he was tested?
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:10 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
Tiger Authority
Man, I'm about to leave you hanging. This board is full of ignorance today and I'm not sure how many times I can repeat the same shite to different people.
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:10 pm to StinkBait72
quote:
The kid was given at least two chances and has done something to blow both of them. (this is assuming last year's suspension was his second offense). He received a great gift from LSU in a free education and a spotlight to show his talent. He did not follow the rules and must now be punished for his actions like a big boy in the real world. I stick by whatever the AD, School, and Coach decides, but it is their choice because he could not make the correct choices on his own.
Again, why is a one-year ban not enough if that is the policy that would allow him to play at every other school in the country?
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:10 pm to cas4t
Bye
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:10 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
Again, why is a one-year ban not enough if that is the policy that would allow him to play at every other school in the country?
well he would be ineligible at georgia
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:10 pm to cas4t
quote:
Man, I'm about to leave you hanging. This board is full of ignorance today and I'm not sure how many times I can repeat the same shite to different people.
Thankfully dinner will force me to leave.
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:11 pm to StinkBait72
quote:
I'll make it clear for you... The kid was given at least two chances and has done something to blow both of them. (this is assuming last year's suspension was his second offense). He received a great gift from LSU in a free education and a spotlight to show his talent. He did not follow the rules and must now be punished for his actions like a big boy in the real world. I stick by whatever the AD, School, and Coach decides, but it is their choice because he could not make the correct choices on his own.
Are you forgetting about LSU policy
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:11 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
well he would be ineligible at georgia
He would? According to the NCAA?
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:11 pm to Tiger Authority
Bc he didn't fail 2,3 or 4 or whatever the # of drug test is at any other school but LSU. The kid didn't want to change. Let it go. He's not coming back
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:12 pm to cas4t
quote:
Google will tell you everything you need to know.
It is very known that it ws drug related. The first incident being last year with synthetic weed.
We don't know about instance 2, meaning it's probably in the off season.
Number 3, we assume through very reasonable context clues given by LSU administration, was what got him kicked off.
LSU policy says 3 tests failed equals suspension for 1 year with the possibility of losing his schoarship.
Please, and I'm trying t be nice, do some research before you come to this board and start spewing off facts.
No links because all you have to do is go to he thread at the very top.
So number 2 and 3 are just assumptions and probables? If we're going to assume and throw out "probably" maybe we should just increase the number to 17 to make a cooler story....
This post was edited on 8/13/12 at 6:13 pm
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:12 pm to cas4t
Cancer don't give a shite.
Gotta cut it off.
Gotta cut it off.
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:13 pm to StinkBait72
quote:
The kid was given at least two chances and has done something to blow both of them. (this is assuming last year's suspension was his second offense). He received a great gift from LSU in a free education and a spotlight to show his talent. He did not follow the rules and must now be punished for his actions like a big boy in the real world. I stick by whatever the AD, School, and Coach decides, but it is their choice because he could not make the correct choices on his own.
no one is defending the fact that he's an idiot for breaking the rules. YOU were arguing that he shouldn't get special treatment and/or he failed more than 3 drug tests.
It isn't special treatment if LSU has a policy in place. It is a NCAA violation if we didn't enforce that policy after the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd offence
This post was edited on 8/13/12 at 6:13 pm
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:13 pm to fastedLSU
quote:
So you answered your previous question speculating as to when he was tested?
what are you talking about? you claimed there was a 4th failed test that we covered up, when there is no evidence to support that. i never insinuated he wasn't tested during fall practice. obviously he was. but the fact of the matter is that if this was the 4th failed test, he was never punished for the 3rd because he was still on the team and practicing OR this mythical failed test no one heard about never happened and this latest failed test was, in fact, his 3rd.
This post was edited on 8/13/12 at 6:14 pm
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:13 pm to fastedLSU
quote:
Bc he didn't fail 2,3 or 4 or whatever the # of drug test is at any other school but LSU. The kid didn't want to change. Let it go. He's not coming back
And he's banned according to NCAA standards of playing next year at another FCS school. He could play the following. LSU should let him play the following if he gets it together and stays. A one-year punishment is sizable.
Posted on 8/13/12 at 6:13 pm to Festus
quote:
So number 2 and 3 are just assumptions and probables? If we're going to assume and throw out "probably" maybe we should just increase the number to 17 to make a cooler story....
Might as well be 17, the result is the same. He's gone for good
Page 5 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News