- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/19/18 at 7:47 pm to BayouCowboy
Which is a huge positive considering the depth of our D-Line
Posted on 5/19/18 at 7:49 pm to BIWO
Our OL coach has a Super Bowl ring. Need I say more?
Posted on 5/19/18 at 7:50 pm to BIWO
quote:
1) Both projected tackles didn’t play
2) 1st and 2nd string were mixed
3) Spring games are usually sloppy
4) James Cregg is a pretty darn good coach
5) Does any O-Line ever look good against Aranda?
This. We lack depth at tackle but if we can avoid injuries the O line should be good. The battle at center will be interesting as well IMO
Posted on 5/19/18 at 7:51 pm to mostbesttigerfanever
Or our D-Line is just good and we played 2nd and 3rd string tackles in the spring game. But ya know, logic...
Posted on 5/19/18 at 8:58 pm to tlsu15
It's either going to be this (tlsu15):
or this (semjase)...
I'm thinking Cushenberry is going to be solid. I'm also thinking both Traore and Deculus will be at least "adequate", providing depth. Not as much as we want, but not catastrophe either. If I'm wrong on either, we will have issues.
And yes, the spring game is not a good measure of the offensive line as a squad, for several reasons. However, it is good to look at individual performance. For Traore it was disappointing. For Cush it needed to be better. Charles didn't play, Lewis met and exceeded the hype, Ingram was very good, Savage wasn't half bad (he just doesn't have all the tools to be a regular starter).
On Traore... this is the one to watch. Not because we/I want him over Deculus. Because it will tell us something about Cregg and his abilities. Eh, maybe about Traore. Let me explain...
watch the first HUDL video, best example is at 1:22 mark
Traore HUDL
He does it everytime, but it's most visible at that mark. Watch the hands. He drops them, he winds up, sometimes he pumps them vertically. No, hell no, and frick no. You can't do that. Not to mention he gets them up late to make matters worse. That's, as stated, a big no-no. You lose first punch, you lose adaptability, you lose space. He's got this huge wingspan that isn't being utilized. His biggest advantage he gives away on pass protection.
So here's the question, using this horrible technique failure as an overall statement on Traore:
Question 1: was he just not coached well (before LSU)?
If so, Cregg has his work cut out for him and if he can get Traore "viable" or better, we can have faith in Cregg's abilities. This is my position. You don't see it hardly any in the spring game and I've said since early in his recruitment he had a lot of work to do.
Question 2: if he had good coaching, is this an indicator Traore just isn't that "coachable"?
If so, and I don't think so, he's not a lost cause but now we are reliant on Deculus getting ready, fully. The potential for having a bad year on the OL just went up (Semjase's post).
I know I'm taking this one quirk and extrapolating it into this much broader thing, but it's all we have for now. And this is definitely horrible technique. It's hard not to miss. First time I watched this back in Dec I think I wanted to scream at the screen.
So for now: watch Traore's hands. If they're good, Cregg's doing ok and we have a better chance of this going more to tlsu15's way. Cregg has enough to work with, to me it's all about him right now.
Oh:
- quotes on Cole Smith were motivation for Cush, he's not ready to start. Will play though, probably at OG for reps; you don't necessarily want to rotate C's because of snaps.
- Cush was having trouble with snaps (I didn't see a damn one of them). Was told it was with Narcisse only (primarily?). That's part of that shoring up.
- Watch for news that Ingram, Brumfield, or Lewis practicing at C more than normal (you always practice a G some, just not that much). If they are doing 'tryouts', I was wrong about Cushenberry and while might shore up C by moving one, we would be doing a little bit of addition by subtraction; not the end of the world, but it's an indicator personnel development is not as good as it needs to be.
Semjase is right about one thing for sure, you can't put just the 5 best OL out there, you have to field the best squad. Strengths and weaknesses of the individual need to be complimented along with the usual "gel".
quote:
We need to solidify the center position and are a little light at tackle. It seems like Charles and Decalus will be our best two, and neither of them played this spring.
We are loaded at guard. I think if one of them could slide over and play Center, we'd be really strong up the middle. If not, it's going to be Cushenberry starting there.
or this (semjase)...
quote:
, but until we get 5 starting OL's that are consistently good at "Quick Information Processing" and can physically dominate who they're supposed to be blocking, the LSU Offense will not be as good as everybody wants. And who's the fricking starting Center that will make all the OL calls? Lloyd "Nobody in the SEC recruited Me" Cushenberry, Damiem "I've never played Center" Lewis or Cole "True freshman that's not big or strong enough Yet" Smith.
I'm thinking Cushenberry is going to be solid. I'm also thinking both Traore and Deculus will be at least "adequate", providing depth. Not as much as we want, but not catastrophe either. If I'm wrong on either, we will have issues.
And yes, the spring game is not a good measure of the offensive line as a squad, for several reasons. However, it is good to look at individual performance. For Traore it was disappointing. For Cush it needed to be better. Charles didn't play, Lewis met and exceeded the hype, Ingram was very good, Savage wasn't half bad (he just doesn't have all the tools to be a regular starter).
On Traore... this is the one to watch. Not because we/I want him over Deculus. Because it will tell us something about Cregg and his abilities. Eh, maybe about Traore. Let me explain...
watch the first HUDL video, best example is at 1:22 mark
Traore HUDL
He does it everytime, but it's most visible at that mark. Watch the hands. He drops them, he winds up, sometimes he pumps them vertically. No, hell no, and frick no. You can't do that. Not to mention he gets them up late to make matters worse. That's, as stated, a big no-no. You lose first punch, you lose adaptability, you lose space. He's got this huge wingspan that isn't being utilized. His biggest advantage he gives away on pass protection.
So here's the question, using this horrible technique failure as an overall statement on Traore:
Question 1: was he just not coached well (before LSU)?
If so, Cregg has his work cut out for him and if he can get Traore "viable" or better, we can have faith in Cregg's abilities. This is my position. You don't see it hardly any in the spring game and I've said since early in his recruitment he had a lot of work to do.
Question 2: if he had good coaching, is this an indicator Traore just isn't that "coachable"?
If so, and I don't think so, he's not a lost cause but now we are reliant on Deculus getting ready, fully. The potential for having a bad year on the OL just went up (Semjase's post).
I know I'm taking this one quirk and extrapolating it into this much broader thing, but it's all we have for now. And this is definitely horrible technique. It's hard not to miss. First time I watched this back in Dec I think I wanted to scream at the screen.
So for now: watch Traore's hands. If they're good, Cregg's doing ok and we have a better chance of this going more to tlsu15's way. Cregg has enough to work with, to me it's all about him right now.
Oh:
- quotes on Cole Smith were motivation for Cush, he's not ready to start. Will play though, probably at OG for reps; you don't necessarily want to rotate C's because of snaps.
- Cush was having trouble with snaps (I didn't see a damn one of them). Was told it was with Narcisse only (primarily?). That's part of that shoring up.
- Watch for news that Ingram, Brumfield, or Lewis practicing at C more than normal (you always practice a G some, just not that much). If they are doing 'tryouts', I was wrong about Cushenberry and while might shore up C by moving one, we would be doing a little bit of addition by subtraction; not the end of the world, but it's an indicator personnel development is not as good as it needs to be.
Semjase is right about one thing for sure, you can't put just the 5 best OL out there, you have to field the best squad. Strengths and weaknesses of the individual need to be complimented along with the usual "gel".
Posted on 5/19/18 at 10:15 pm to I20goon
We will be fine at guard. Charles should be fine at LT. Cushenberry was garbage in the spring game and Traore and Magee got abused. Chaisson was in the backfield every play. We don't have a center and unless Deculus steps up his game we're going to be lacking at one of the tackle positions. I'm not as down on the OL as semjase but I agree they will probably struggle against the good DL's we play, especially in pass protection.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 10:27 pm to BIWO
quote:
I’m not gonna sit here and tell you we’ll have the best O-Line in the SEC, but I wouldn’t be surprised if we finished top 3.
I’m not down on the OL, but it will NOT be top 3 in the SEC.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 10:39 pm to Penrod
I don’t think we will either, but wouldn’t surprise me. Season hasn’t even started yet, don’t be so negative.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 11:01 pm to BIWO
quote:It's about what Cregg does with the from here. The raw material is there.
I don’t think we will either, but wouldn’t surprise me. Season hasn’t even started yet, don’t be so negative.
Essentially, the story has yet to be written. Acknowledging that the first couple of chapters have been... and it's somewhere between 'meh' and 'well this ain't too bad'.
Unfortunately OL can't rely on size. It only goes so far. Where a WR can be 'viable' just because he's fast, an OL have to have certain skills just to be viable. It will always be a work in progress.
There's a reason ALL lineman prefer run blocking over pass blocking. For a big hoss pass blocking is not natural. You are going to take a baby step back, let someone almost as big as you attack you, starting from a position of in a stance inches from each other instead of attacking him with your biggest advantage- size. To make matters worse they can grab you, but you can't them so in this motion of letting someone attack you, you're going to hand fight with them while trying to shove them in the direction other than they want to go.
Nothing about that says size wins. Un-natural.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 11:21 pm to I20goon
Whatever offense Ensminger is installing- the quarterback better be able to get rid of the ball quickly.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 11:55 pm to BayouCowboy
Oline will be a strength for sure. We have better depth then in recent years. Outside of C of course. Last year was a struggle with the freshman getting thrown into the fire. It took a month or so but they really looked good down the stretch especially for freshman. Ingram Charles Magee (RSfr) and Campbell are all sophomores with experience and talented to boot. Brumfield is gonna have a breakthrough season. He looked very impressive at times last year. He will be ready. Damien Lewis is a beast and when Booger said no way coaches keep him off the field that means something. Austin Delucus is unproven but getting noticed. Cushenberry is talented but can he be consistent snapping the ball ? That’s the big Unknown. Some have said Brumfield could get snaps at C. I would love that because he is talented and I just haven’t seen Cush n action yet. Bottom line is we have talent and experience and one of the better oline coaches out there. People don’t realize how good of a hire this was. I sure do
Posted on 5/20/18 at 12:06 am to Blanky6715
quote:
Also the first team got split up in spring game so no one really knows how good the starting 5 will be.
??? We were missing 2 starters due to injury/rehab.
Posted on 5/20/18 at 12:18 am to semjase
quote:
Shake those Pom Poms, keep your heads buried in the sand and down vote away kiddies.
You forgot, "...and beg Bobby Bowden for video on how to run The Veer!"
Posted on 5/20/18 at 6:00 am to mikeytig
quote:From what I've seen, not necessarily the case. Some misdirection and yes some Canadian motion. CSE does love bootlegs and roll outs.
Whatever offense Ensminger is installing- the quarterback better be able to get rid of the ball quickly.
I'll take this opportunity to point out something: With a RPO option offense and OL run blocking on relatively quick pass plays (relates to your comment) it masks some OL pass protection deficiencies. That's why, for example, a MSST OL grades out on PP with 'lesser star talent' than LSU.
Posted on 5/20/18 at 7:05 am to semjase
quote:
Most of the Diaper Brigade on this board apparently have no idea what an Offensive Line is and what it does. Nobody on the one at LSU, would make the two-deep OL depth chart at Alabama.
Bruh did you see the Bama game last season?
Ok say you're right! Our 3rd string Bama O-line without the added depth it will have this season pushed Bama's starting defense up and down the field. LSU fans haven't seen play like that against them for a hot minute. LSU fans can only hope that they get the same type of push against them this year in Death Valley.
The LSU qb DE had time for days but couldn't hit the deep ball on several opportunities.
LSU fans should have plenty of cautious optimism going into this season.
My concerns are here, if I'm not mistaken none of the projected starters at qb, rb, wr have actually started a game for LSU so there's that.
Posted on 5/20/18 at 9:39 am to I20goon
quote:
Semjase is right about one thing for sure, you can't put just the 5 best OL out there
Good OL analysis, BTW, baw - and you and Semjase are right about the unit thing - especially the middle 3. Those guys really play as a unit on pass blocking and this is often ignored by casual fans who only pay attention to pancake blocks or road grading by guards and centers.
Now, I am of a mind that you have to get your 2 best options at OT on the outside. LSU has tried for way too many damned years to force great guards to be serviceable tackles, or worse, mediocre tackles to just try to get better.
I think we have 3 or 4 legit OTs now - for the first time in a long time. Traore needs coaching, but my goodness he has all the uncoachable stuff, right? I don't think his listed 6'8" is puffed up all that much - he's a man among men, and not overly thick - I think he's about 320 or 325 right now - extremely long arms. Technique improvement as you suggested make him an All-SEC candidate immediately.
Deculus is still probably a year away - I wish we could have redshirted him last year, but hopefully the experience will jump start him for this year. Charles has been a pleasant surprise, as I figured him to be all guard when he first arrived.
Posted on 5/20/18 at 4:06 pm to Penrod
quote:lol, I hear you... but it's not only possible I'd say if a couple of chips fall our way it's likely.
I’m not down on the OL, but it will NOT be top 3 in the SEC.
However, those rankings are horrible. So some of my disagreement lies in the fact rankings are misleading. What would you say if I told you by using very similar grading/ranking formulas for OL that Pro Football Focus uses we were the #4 IN THE NATION OL last year (going by 'adjusted line yards'). That would rank #1 in the SEC just ahead of Alabama.
At the same time, we were #97 in adj sack rate and #121 in pass-downs sack rate (sack rate when opp knows you are going to pass).
So when someone says "the #___ ranked OL" be very skeptical. Like when everyone said we had the 2016 #1 ranked OL... it's misleading. We barely ranked better in 2016 than 2017 in those two catagories. It's based off of yards, in various forms, which included LF7.
However... in more realistic terms (not going by rankings, go by grades) we just might have the #3 SEC OL next year. When you look at returning starters with Ingram and Charles taking a lot of lumps (plus Charles might be the most athletic tackle I've seen since Madarich and Ingram is no slouch at all) and many other OLs are "down".
So if they happens, it's a combination of us improving and alot of the competion taking a step back. UGA lost some important pieces but is similar to us in the fact the pipeline just needs to some work to get back, Bama is Bama, Ole Miss is hurting, MSST could be the #2 OL, Auburn and UF are down, etc. etc.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News