- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SEC officials are out of control
Posted on 10/18/09 at 5:54 pm to choupiquesushi
Posted on 10/18/09 at 5:54 pm to choupiquesushi
quote:
actually ND usually gets biase in favor from many conferences = because those conference want to be called when ND needs refs.......
You are clueless; simply and utterly clueless
1
Posted on 10/18/09 at 5:59 pm to dudeilovebeer
If the ref's get in the way hit them to!
Posted on 10/18/09 at 6:19 pm to Oyster
quote:
It seems that Florida is the new Alabama.
No so fast my friend. Bama DBs were mugging USC receivers all night long and got away with most of it.
I agree completely.
I mean, I'm not naive. I realize that there's big money on the line and these games are "helped" along when needed, but do they have to be so obvious about it?
There's a big difference between missing a call and "missing" a call.
Posted on 10/18/09 at 7:22 pm to TX Tiger
Posted on 10/18/09 at 7:35 pm to nuwaydawg
quote:
1st down?
Yes, it was.
Posted on 10/18/09 at 7:38 pm to arrakis
quote:
Yes, it was.
When this play happened I could not believe the spot they gave UF there
Posted on 10/18/09 at 7:39 pm to arrakis
quote:
actually ND usually gets biase in favor from many conferences = because those conference want to be called when ND needs refs.......
You are clueless; simply and utterly clueless
talk to a ref from any major conf.. they wanna work nd games.. the conference office does..
like it or not its a fact
Posted on 10/18/09 at 7:41 pm to medtiger
quote:
So, a conference would instruct its officials to be biased at ND in order to get its refs sent there again instead of being biased in favor of the team that stands to make them $17 million if it gets to a BCS bowl game? Right...
USC would be in a BCS game at the end of the day anyway...
and there is still a big battle behind the scenes to get ND in a FB conference
Posted on 10/18/09 at 7:41 pm to choupiquesushi
quote:
like it or not its a fact
The only fact is you are clueless.
Posted on 10/18/09 at 7:51 pm to nuwaydawg
quote:
1st down?
Holy shite, I missed that play...that's terrible.
Posted on 10/18/09 at 7:53 pm to Golfer
quote:
Holy shite, I missed that play...that's terrible.
How so?
Posted on 10/18/09 at 8:05 pm to arrakis
quote:
How so?
The ball-carrier is a full yard short of the first down line and based on the assumption of the original post, that UF was awarded the first.
Before you even say it:
- Yes, I know the yellow line is not the "official" indicator of a first down. However, I have never seen it a full yard off...
- Yes, I know that he could have had forward progress marked for a first down. However, judging by the complaining, this was not the case.
This post was edited on 10/18/09 at 8:07 pm
Posted on 10/18/09 at 8:19 pm to Golfer
Actually, if you freeze frame the video at :07, you can see 6 players in the backfield. The left guard and tackle...by rule...are not allowed to be aligned with their helmet behind the centers shoulders. +5 in the backfield.
Illegal procedure. Florida does it all the time.
Illegal procedure. Florida does it all the time.
Posted on 10/18/09 at 8:20 pm to nuwaydawg
quote:
are not allowed to be aligned with their helmet behind the centers shoulders
Waist.
Posted on 10/18/09 at 8:28 pm to Golfer
quote:
The ball-carrier is a full yard short of the first down line and based on the assumption of the original post, that UF was awarded the first.
There's been a TON of assuming that is the case.
quote:
However, I have never seen it a full yard off...
If you watch the video from the beginning of the series and note the original LOS, that's exactly what happened. CBS screwed the pooch on their video graphics.
The camera angle is way off the LOS, but it's about the 29 and the line to gain is about the 19. His progress was about the 19. They bring in the sticks, measure.....1st down.
FanTards have been going batshit crazy over an orange line that's in the wrong place.
Posted on 10/18/09 at 8:33 pm to choupiquesushi
quote:
USC would be in a BCS game at the end of the day anyway...
If USC would have lost yesterday, and then Oregon runs the table, USC would not be in a BCS game.
Posted on 10/18/09 at 9:19 pm to nuwaydawg
I saw this BS spot, too, but it is no worse than any of the other utter BS calls at the end of that game.
Karma is going to catch up with the Gators/UM and I hope that I can just witness it.
Karma is going to catch up with the Gators/UM and I hope that I can just witness it.
Posted on 10/18/09 at 9:34 pm to MC123
quote:
If the SEC gets one team in a BCS bowl game, they will receive $17.5 million.
If the SEC gets two teams in BCS bowl games, they will receive $36 million.
If you think Florida and Bama aren't going to get the benefit of the doubt from SEC officials, you are sorely mistaken.
Interesting theory. How many times has the loser of the SECCG played in a BCS bowl?
Posted on 10/18/09 at 9:59 pm to 62zip
quote:
62zip
Vandy got called for Leaping in the GA game. The only one more rare, for me, is Hurdling.
Posted on 10/18/09 at 10:28 pm to arrakis
quote:
like it or not its a fact
The only fact is you are clueless.
how many BCS conf. refs do you know?
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News