- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Sam’s targeting call is SEC Deep State telling LSU, and the world, their place
Posted on 11/12/23 at 8:58 am
Posted on 11/12/23 at 8:58 am
After Bama week, know your role fellas
19
Posted on 11/12/23 at 8:59 am to Meauxjeaux
said the same last night
Posted on 11/12/23 at 9:00 am to Meauxjeaux
Like Kelly said by the letter of the law it was probably correct, but it doesn’t explain why the law was completely ignored last week.
Posted on 11/12/23 at 9:01 am to Meauxjeaux
It sure felt that was. Total bullshite. I’m glad BK took a public shot at them for it.
Realistically, Sam’s only other option was to dive out of the play. The letter of the law be damned in that circumstance.
Realistically, Sam’s only other option was to dive out of the play. The letter of the law be damned in that circumstance.
This post was edited on 11/12/23 at 9:02 am
Posted on 11/12/23 at 9:03 am to Meauxjeaux
The feel of the play and then the call was like they’ve had been looking for an opportunity all game and finally said frick it let’s use this one.
Posted on 11/12/23 at 9:03 am to misey94
Yeah it was a call from the booth. There was no flag. You know they had to be watching every play with a microscope.
Posted on 11/12/23 at 9:04 am to Meauxjeaux
It was literally the right call. How fricking crazy are you people?
Posted on 11/12/23 at 9:05 am to Meauxjeaux
quote:
The feel of the play and then the call was like they’ve had been looking for an opportunity all game and finally said frick it let’s use this one.
not one of the sky is falling, tin foil hat, conspiracy types, but that's exactly what I thought after that bullshite call
Posted on 11/12/23 at 9:06 am to landrywasbeast30
quote:That was never noticed unless you were on a mission looking for it. If you don't believe that you are a fool.
It was literally the right call. How fricking crazy are you people?
Posted on 11/12/23 at 9:06 am to landrywasbeast30
I just can’t understand that if these calls are for safety reasons and to protect the player why is it never called on the offense player that gets lowand puts his helmet straight into a defender to run over them?
Posted on 11/12/23 at 9:06 am to landrywasbeast30
quote:
landrywasbeast30
quote:
It was literally the right call. How fricking crazy are you people?
Posted on 11/12/23 at 9:07 am to landrywasbeast30
quote:
It was literally the right call. How fricking crazy are you people?
Why was it not targeting on the offensive player? He lowered his head into Sam’s.
This post was edited on 11/12/23 at 9:08 am
Posted on 11/12/23 at 9:07 am to misey94
It was 100% a message. That was a we call penalties, not you, so shut up. I think that entire game was setup to be that way. It wouldn’t surprise me if they tipped off Florida too letting them know they could get away with late hits, etc.
Unfortunately, we didn’t get the message. I am thinking A@M will be bad.
Unfortunately, we didn’t get the message. I am thinking A@M will be bad.
Posted on 11/12/23 at 9:09 am to landrywasbeast30
quote:
It was literally the right call. How fricking crazy are you people?
It was like a phantom hold where if you play it in slow mo you could see a slight jersey tug, while in reality you could call it every play.
I could give you 5 more ejections on each team if I went back and rewatched every second level tackle by each team.
The issue is what was discussed, completely ignoring a more blatant one against bama that actually affected the game (best player taken out).
Posted on 11/12/23 at 9:10 am to TheJuicey
Both plays were targeting according to the rules.
Posted on 11/12/23 at 9:11 am to griswold
Specifically against a weak position group with minimal depth and taking out the most experienced player. It was a sham.
Posted on 11/12/23 at 9:12 am to Meauxjeaux
quote:
Why was it not targeting on the offensive player? He lowered his head into Sam’s.
Also this
The runner was the aggressor here. Unless you want to create an entire new drill where a defender stands his ground and you constantly raise and lower a helmet while the DB avoids I don’t know how you plan to stop this
We should just teach our RBs to match the defenders level every run and 12 plays into the game will be playing the second team D
This post was edited on 11/12/23 at 9:13 am
Posted on 11/12/23 at 9:13 am to Meauxjeaux
You do know they all have the same handshake right?
Posted on 11/12/23 at 9:14 am to South21
If they were both targeting, why was only 1 deemed targeting and reviewed? It just happens to be the one on a not defenseless player that wasn’t even to the head?
Posted on 11/12/23 at 9:14 am to Meauxjeaux
Absolutely. The SEC office is and has been hopelessly corrupt for as long as I’ve paid attention to such things.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News