- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Roster Question if/when Laird Returns
Posted on 5/29/13 at 9:50 am to harry coleman beast
Posted on 5/29/13 at 9:50 am to harry coleman beast
Which means the logical choice, assuming they are confident with Moore at 3rd, would have been Yocom at 2nd, Katz at 1st, Moore at 3rd. Everyone would have been back in their "normal" position.
This post was edited on 5/29/13 at 9:53 am
Posted on 5/29/13 at 9:52 am to ell_13
quote:
The reach was saying Ibarra at SS and Moore at 3B is an experiment.
It isn't a reach at all.
Posted on 5/29/13 at 9:54 am to MOT
quote:I don't feel like going back and reading the last few pages to catch up, but am I to understand the debate has now turned to what was wrong with the lineup during the SEC tournament last week which we WON???
Which means the logical choice, assuming they are confident with Moore at 3rd, would have been Yocom at 2nd, Katz at first, Moore at 3rd. Everyone would have been back in their "normal" position.
Posted on 5/29/13 at 9:55 am to LSURussian
Again more discussion. Should we make another thread about USL?
Posted on 5/29/13 at 9:57 am to MOT
quote:
Which means the logical choice, assuming they are confident with Moore at 3rd, would have been Yocom at 2nd, Katz at 1st, Moore at 3rd. Everyone would have been back in their "normal" position.
I understand what you are saying. But trust me, as a coach, in the 9th inning with a one-run lead, one move is better than three moves. And that one decision does not put Yocom ahead of Moore at 3B.
quote:
It isn't a reach at all.
This post was edited on 5/29/13 at 9:59 am
Posted on 5/29/13 at 9:57 am to harry coleman beast
ONE HUNDRED MOAR
Posted on 5/29/13 at 9:57 am to LSURussian
No, I pointed out Yocom would need to be on the roster in case Bregman was hurt because he would play short. Others think we would play Ibarra at short and Moore at 3rd. I then pointed out reasons why I don't think that would be the case.
Posted on 5/29/13 at 10:00 am to harry coleman beast
Surely even you can see the humor in multiple pages of posts about how the coaches f*cked up last week in spite of us winning the tournament with one starter out the entire tournament and another starter out for the final two games.
Now that's funny right there, I don't care who you are...
Now that's funny right there, I don't care who you are...
Posted on 5/29/13 at 10:01 am to LSURussian
Its much better than crying about what a school in Lafayette calls themselves, imo.
Posted on 5/29/13 at 10:01 am to MOT
quote:
Yocom would need to be on the roster in case Bregman was hurt
OH, GAWD.....PLEASE NO!!!!!
Posted on 5/29/13 at 10:05 am to ell_13
quote:
I understand what you are saying. But trust me, as a coach, in the 9th inning with a one-run lead, one move is better than three moves. And that one decision does not put Yocom ahead of Moore at 3B.
As a coach in the 9th inning protecting a one run lead you want your best defensive team on the field under the given circumstances.
I said I could see the scenario play out if they get caught in a bind, need offense late, have to use pinch hitters, etc. But given how Mainieri has used those mentioned so far this year I think it is safe to say it wouldn't be the first option.
Posted on 5/29/13 at 10:09 am to MOT
quote:
But given how Mainieri has used those mentioned so far this year I think it is safe to say it wouldn't be the first option
I thought you were basing your argument on one move, not the whole year?
Posted on 5/29/13 at 10:19 am to MOT
I just tried to read the last few pages. Y'all are hurting my head 
Posted on 5/29/13 at 10:19 am to harry coleman beast
quote:From a quick review of those threads, you seem to be one of the main posters keeping those threads alive.
Should we make another thread about USL?
Posted on 5/29/13 at 10:20 am to LSURussian
quote:
From a quick review of those threads, you seem to be one of the main posters keeping those threads alive
hes very skilled at it too
Posted on 5/29/13 at 10:21 am to ell_13
No, the original Yocom argument was not based on one inning of one game.
We ended up there as a result of the "experiment" comment.
We ended up there as a result of the "experiment" comment.
Posted on 5/29/13 at 10:26 am to harry coleman beast
quote:
Trolling....
Oh, okay.
Posted on 5/29/13 at 10:32 am to bubbz
I don't mind this stuff. At least it's actual discussion and we can defend our arguments without the BS.
From what I've gathered, it becomes an opinion on if you think we need the pitching for Omaha. If you do, you keep Newman and drop either Yocom, Barash, Edward, or Stevenson.
From what I've gathered, it becomes an opinion on if you think we need the pitching for Omaha. If you do, you keep Newman and drop either Yocom, Barash, Edward, or Stevenson.
Posted on 5/29/13 at 10:37 am to ell_13
quote:
and drop either Yocom, Barash, Edward, or Stevenson.
Yocom- won't happen. He's a senior.
Edward-ditto.
Stevenson-leave a starter off the roster?
Barash- ding, ding, ding!!!
Popular
Back to top



2



