Started By
Message

re: Question about the court order Chambliss is playing under

Posted on 9/10/26 at 11:21 am to
Posted by NC_Tigah
Ray Bans for Max Polarization
Member since Sep 2003
141046 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 11:21 am to
quote:

These are questions he should be made to answer. I personally think he’s looking the other way as a sop to Ole Miss for losing Kiffin.
Or Ole Miss blatantly interfering with Clemson recruits
Posted by Geauxldilocks
Member since Aug 2018
6704 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 11:22 am to
quote:

Oh, so now we are going to selectively enforce our eligibility rules, huh?


They are but are losing their ultimate goal of the antitrust exemption in the process.

The SEC making enemies of Johnson, Scalise, Cassidy, and Kennedy was incredibly short sighted.

Local judges will continue to rule the game.
Posted by Tht_1_Night_At_ElCid
Member since Sep 2026
50 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 11:32 am to
It shouldn't matter. It was a sore throat bruh. Not a case of herp-a-gona-cefilitis.

I'm just some swamp dwelling cajun. But, in my mind does this set a precedent for a player that got hurt in game 1 and missed a season. To get a TRO to play another year?

If some clown can catch a sore throat and file a TRO and get an entire season. What about the kid who broke his leg in game 1 and missed the season? Should he get another year too?
This post was edited on 9/10/26 at 11:36 am
Posted by Portcityblues
Member since Jan 2017
1860 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 11:33 am to
Chambliss had a very serious medical condition. he had a sore throat for at least a month which really prevented all the playing time that a 3rd or 4th string qb normally gets.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram