- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: QB slide rule
Posted on 11/9/25 at 1:17 pm to KamaCausey_LSU
Posted on 11/9/25 at 1:17 pm to KamaCausey_LSU
quote:
I just find it sketchy that they were able to see indisputable evidence enough to overturn the call and say that he started to slide exactly 1/2 a yard short of the first down. Shouldn't be a reviewable play since it's a judgement call
Yes. This is exactly the point. It’s a total judgment call. The ref made the call on the field. No way it was indisputable that he was short. Just a judgment. You go with the call. And it’s not just this call in isolation. It’s what happened that entire drive. In isolation, sure…it’s just a bad break. In aggregate, though, it is really hard to believe anything other than the officials were doing everything they could to slow/stop momentum.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 1:24 pm to taf
Do away with these nuanced rules. If a player is going to run then that player should be subject to being tackled, regardless of his position. If that player is fragile, has lighter pads, etc…it shouldn’t matter. That is the risk/reward of making the decision to run. Many of the sacks a QB takes are as bad as getting tackled anyway.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 1:24 pm to Yeahright
quote:
But that is the rule? If so, why are people complaining so much about the call and not the rule?
I can’t find anything in the rules regarding where a slide starts (or the word hips) in the rule books.
ETA - it is in the replay guidelines - “when backside drops” and then “typically indicated when his butt starts to drop”.
It does say that you are down when you obviously start a feet first slide - at the forward-most point of the ball. The most obvious spot he was sliding was the first down marker - it should be very obvious that he intended to slide when he reached that mark.
Blindly accepting this explanation about hips dropping, in my opinion, completely ignores the spirit of the rule. If this were actually the correct interpretation, then it would basically have to be a requirement that every slide is reviewed to determine the spot of the ball.
Interestingly, this rule has been highlighted in the past because of a fake slide. The rules specifically say that it has to be called on the field and cannot be reviewed. This among other reasons should also show that instant replay should not be used to overturn spots on the field. Again, it undermines the spirit of instant replay “getting the call right” when it is clearly judgmental for which calls actually need to be right.
Anyone that has watched enough football knows that dead ball spots are not always precise. The result of the review can’t be the standard of precision
This post was edited on 11/9/25 at 1:50 pm
Posted on 11/9/25 at 1:29 pm to 85Tiger
quote:
Do away with these nuanced rules
Yeah. Agree. Maybe it’s all just bad luck. But Alabama seems to be on the “lucky” end of it quite frequently, and not just against LSU. These judgments allow for at least the appearance of corruption and gambling influence.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 1:31 pm to taf
quote:
In isolation, sure…it’s just a bad break. In aggregate, though, it is really hard to believe anything other than the officials were doing everything they could to slow/stop momentum.
You don't need to go tin foil hat with the officials. They are at times just awful at their job. If they were truly trying to favor Bama, they would not have missed the obvious pass interference by Delane.
I agree we overall got screwed by the number of bad calls/non-calls. One or not both of late hit out of bounds should've been called. The slide was a bad spot originally that was corrected with the dumbass slide rule they have in place. Again, if the game is being fixed, why not mark him short immediately?
Posted on 11/9/25 at 1:34 pm to Yeahright
But the Alabama Wide Receiver was bobbling the catch both before and after he came down out of bounds. Should not have been a catch for a Touchdown and Should have had a replay review.
frick Alabama!!!
...and frick the SEC.
frick Alabama!!!
...and frick the SEC.
This post was edited on 11/9/25 at 1:36 pm
Posted on 11/9/25 at 1:49 pm to Yeahright
They didn't call Kenny Pickett down when he did that fake slide and ran for a TD a few years ago.
Did they change the rule BECAUSE of that?
Did they change the rule BECAUSE of that?
Posted on 11/9/25 at 1:53 pm to KamaCausey_LSU
quote:
I just find it sketchy that they were able to see indisputable evidence enough to overturn the call and say that he started to slide exactly 1/2 a yard short of the first down.
Shouldn't be a reviewable play since it's a judgement call as to when the QB begins his slide. I guarantee that there is nothing in the book as detailed and not picky as the announcers were being.
Yeah that’s what bothered me about it. The rule says he’s down where he starts the slide. That’s fine. But where he “starts” the slide is a judgement call. It’s pretty shitty to overturn a judgement call on the field just to mark a guy 1/2 yard short when it was obvious to everyone that he wasn’t even gonna be touched before the marker, no matter where he started.
The other part that’s shitty is that he’s supposed to be down where he gives himself up. Meaning down at the point where if a defender hits him, it’s a 15 yard penalty. Does anyone really think it would have been a flag if a Bama player laid into him at the point where they called him down? Because I don’t. If refs are going to call it like that, QBs should slide late every time.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 1:58 pm to taf
quote:
Yes. This is exactly the point. It’s a total judgment call. The ref made the call on the field. No way it was indisputable that he was short. Just a judgment. You go with the call. And it’s not just this call in isolation. It’s what happened that entire drive. In isolation, sure…it’s just a bad break. In aggregate, though, it is really hard to believe anything other than the officials were doing everything they could to slow/stop momentum.
From the rules “the replay process operates under the fundamental assumption that the call on the field is correct…clear and indisputable evidence”
Challenging three plays in the same drive, perhaps three consecutive plays, is not operating under that assumption. If you feel this call was incorrect, that’s why you feel this way. It’s bullshite, and it leads directly to people complaining about calls because of uneven application.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 2:06 pm to Basura Blanco
quote:
Again, if the game is being fixed, why not mark him short immediately?
Because he wound up way past the line to gain, and was never under any threat of getting stopped before it?
This rule is for the safety of the ball carrier. The overturned call really weakens the integrity of the rule, and if I were MVB I would be “dripping my butt” before every time i get hit to try and get 15 more yards.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 2:45 pm to Yeahright
They just cannot put it into the hands of the refs. The runner should be down where he touches. Just as with qb pressure and pass defense, give the defenders a step or two so if the player runs too close he best expect to be hit.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 2:59 pm to Madking
In the NFL, if a QB is sliding, they are giving themselves up are are ruled down without being touched. Same rule as kneeling in victory formation.
Thet are exceptions to protect the QB.
Thet are exceptions to protect the QB.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 3:27 pm to OceanMan
quote:
This rule is for the safety of the ball carrier. The overturned call really weakens the integrity of the rule
I am not arguing the rule. Im arguing the officials are on the take angle.
As for the rule, it and ejection for targeting, are the two worst changes to football in its entire history. A can understand rules for protecting the passer and kickers in the process of passing or kicking, but them having protection in the act of running with the football is asinine, especially in the college game when you don't need to be touched to be down. Just enforce the late hit rule.
Honestly, I think QBs would prefer it. Its been around what, 30 yrs? And it still looks like awfully unnatural act in tackle football.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 3:28 pm to Thorny
Correct but NFL and college have different definition of being down so you don’t need the NFL rule for college. You’d take away that natural corruption of judgment.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 4:31 pm to MikeBRLA
quote:
That is correct. The rule was amended bc QBs were beginning to slide, the defense would back off, then the QB would come out of his slide and continue. A fake slide. So now the QB is now ruled down when the slide begins.
Which is why MVB went head first on the next drive to get the first. If they really are concerned about preventing injury, give them ground contact spot. If QB comes out of a slide to trick the defense, flag it.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 4:55 pm to MikeBRLA
quote:
That is correct. The rule was amended bc QBs were beginning to slide, the defense would back off, then the QB would come out of his slide and continue. A fake slide. So now the QB is now ruled down when the slide begins.
The Kenny Pickett rule.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 4:59 pm to Basura Blanco
quote:
You don't need to go tin foil hat with the officials. They are at times just awful at their job. If they were truly trying to favor Bama, they would not have missed the obvious pass interference by Delane.
Bama always seems to benefit more than most - it’s amazing how technically sound they are, especially in big games.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 5:00 pm to Dicky
quote:
They didn't call Kenny Pickett down when he did that fake slide and ran for a TD a few years ago.
Did they change the rule BECAUSE of that?
Correct.
Popular
Back to top

3





