- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/16/24 at 11:03 am to DrankMan
Any offense with one dimensional QB becomes predictable.
Posted on 9/16/24 at 11:04 am to Madking
I didnt love the power T stuff.
If you’re going under center, let the RB come down hill.
I didnlike the 4th down call. we got blown up, but the play worked. Williams was wide open of Nuss has a second to get the pass off.
Nuss threw a pick in the red zone, missed Pimpton for a TD.
And that’s going to happen. I dont want to rag on Nuss.
But I feel like play calling wasn’t our issue anywhere near as much as execution was.
If you’re going under center, let the RB come down hill.
I didnlike the 4th down call. we got blown up, but the play worked. Williams was wide open of Nuss has a second to get the pass off.
Nuss threw a pick in the red zone, missed Pimpton for a TD.
And that’s going to happen. I dont want to rag on Nuss.
But I feel like play calling wasn’t our issue anywhere near as much as execution was.
Posted on 9/16/24 at 11:04 am to CalTiger53
Pretty ignorant as usual
Posted on 9/16/24 at 11:05 am to CatfishJohn
quote:
but we have to add screens or counters when the defense just pins their ears back every play to get to the QB
We literally scored a TD on a split zone cutback type play that took advantage of SC blitzing on 3rd and 9.
Posted on 9/16/24 at 11:06 am to SammyTiger
Problem is that we got no push on those plays because they’re just stacked in the middle. Remember the replay where they showed all the USC players pinched and we ran right into it? Gotta be able to make them respect you on the edges.
Posted on 9/16/24 at 11:09 am to Madking
like I said, I dont didn’t love the run plays out of that formation.
but it was something completely different.
i don’t know if running it 3 times in that formation was the move though.
Otherwise I cant sit here and say “that was a shitty play call.”
but it was something completely different.
i don’t know if running it 3 times in that formation was the move though.
Otherwise I cant sit here and say “that was a shitty play call.”
This post was edited on 9/16/24 at 11:10 am
Posted on 9/16/24 at 11:12 am to SammyTiger
I liked the idea as well but again you can’t just run into their teeth again and again when you’re not moving them. You can go outside from that formation, we just didn’t.
Posted on 9/16/24 at 11:16 am to DrankMan
quote:
fullback
lol
Posted on 9/16/24 at 11:21 am to Madking
quote:
But you have to do that more than once to make the defense react to it.
We ran the Zavion motion a bunch. The first time we handed it to him for like 11 yards and then we play faked off that same motion multiple times. The game winning TD also worked because of a jet motion where the DB followed the WR leaving no one home.
Posted on 9/16/24 at 11:26 am to Madking
quote:
Biggest problem is the red zone and short yardage because we aren’t creative enough in threatening the D horizontally. Durham should help there but you still need to give them something to think about outside so they can’t just stack it from tackle to tackle in those situations.
yep. you have to attack east-west and then north-south using whole field.
saints were very effective yesterday against the cowgirls using classic toss sweeps and quick outside tosses. we need jet sweeps also. and bubble screens. stretch them out horizontally then you can gouge them between tackles as long as your formation keeps them spread out.
Posted on 9/16/24 at 11:28 am to TheSearch
quote:
Running the I-formation will really make us tough to scheme against.
Creativity when calling plays is not formation-dependent. You can have scores of plays and motions out of one base formation and be successful.
Lining up in shotgun and running inside zone every short yardage play is completely asinine. When you're predictable, the formation and other window dressings don't accomplish anything.
Posted on 9/16/24 at 11:29 am to iamandykeim
quote:
We were 1 yard away from putting up 40+ on the road against a pretty good defense in an extremely hostile environment. Offense is fine. Just needs better execution in a couple spots.
In the QB's first SEC road start.
It was just a slow start for the offense. The team was unprepared to match USC's intensity, and everyone was off because of it. Once the offense found its stride, it started eating up yards.
Clearly, issues to work on in the red zone, and most of that has to do with the run game issues.
Posted on 9/16/24 at 11:31 am to Madking
quote:
Pretty ignorant as usual
he has always been a poster who is football ignorant.
i'd love to hear his views on how all those old style stand up drop back passers who were not runners did so well in college.
MUH 1 DIMENSIONAL!
This post was edited on 9/16/24 at 11:36 am
Posted on 9/16/24 at 11:34 am to The Pirate King
quote:
Creativity when calling plays is not formation-dependent. You can have scores of plays and motions out of one base formation and be successful.
Lining up in shotgun and running inside zone every short yardage play is completely asinine.
agreed
Posted on 9/16/24 at 11:35 am to Hurricane2020
quote:
Running the i-formation could make our offense extremely tough to scheme against. The i-formation is an incredibly powerful play action formation that, with the right personel, be extremely hard to stop. It's a very multiple formation with tons of play options that can be ran out of it.
We've done it gents. Full Circle. Went from hating the old i formation during the Les era to now wanting it back when our offense isn't the fricking problem
Posted on 9/16/24 at 11:37 am to Madking
i actually was surprised but enjoyed seeing the T formation at least on 1 play. just have to run more plays out of it if you want it as a staple of the offense and not be predictable
Posted on 9/16/24 at 11:37 am to poncho villa
quote:
Went from hating the old i formation during the Les era
Posted on 9/16/24 at 12:23 pm to SammyTiger
LINK
2nd sacks
15th TFL
37th RZC
64 Run Def
50 Total Def
I hope you are correct, but it seems like a bold statement about an unranked team with not articles saying how good they are this year.
2nd sacks
15th TFL
37th RZC
64 Run Def
50 Total Def
I hope you are correct, but it seems like a bold statement about an unranked team with not articles saying how good they are this year.
Posted on 9/16/24 at 12:43 pm to TigerSprings
sorry i had Red Zone TD% which is different that total Redzone% but i think is more
important.
if you give up 60% TDs and 0 FG you’re doing. worst that 75% Fg and 0 Tds.
but again there is a lot to indicate their defensive front is disruptive. they aren’t perfect but they will cause issues.
We did score 36 points and had 400+ yards of total offense. it was just a tough game to do that
important.
if you give up 60% TDs and 0 FG you’re doing. worst that 75% Fg and 0 Tds.
but again there is a lot to indicate their defensive front is disruptive. they aren’t perfect but they will cause issues.
We did score 36 points and had 400+ yards of total offense. it was just a tough game to do that
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News