
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Ole Miss second-half defense
Posted on 9/16/26 at 3:31 pm
Posted on 9/16/26 at 3:31 pm
One thing that stands out to me with Ole Miss through two games is how different their defense has looked before and after halftime.
They’ve been extremely good early. Against Charlotte, five of their six first-half possessions ended in three and outs. That’s impressive against any opponent.
But Charlotte was able to sustain drives after halftime:
65 yards on 13 plays — FG
61 yards on 12 plays — FG
70 yards on 11 plays — FG
9 yards on 3 plays — time ran out
What makes me curious is that Louisville showed a similar pattern.
Louisville before halftime:
FG, Punt, Punt, Punt, Punt, FG
Louisville after halftime:
TD, TD, FG, TD, TD, TD
So far, opponents have had 10 second-half possessions against Ole Miss and scored on nine.
Two games is nowhere near enough to draw a conclusion, but that is a pretty dramatic split. I’m curious whether it’s a conditioning issue, teams figuring them out as the game goes along, or Ole Miss not countering offensive adjustments well enough.
There may be simple explanations for both games.
Louisville - QB making his first start since 2022. Was clearly pissing down his leg early
Charlotte - Ole Miss was leading 27-0, the game was basically over, and LSU was next on the schedule.
They’ve been extremely good early. Against Charlotte, five of their six first-half possessions ended in three and outs. That’s impressive against any opponent.
But Charlotte was able to sustain drives after halftime:
65 yards on 13 plays — FG
61 yards on 12 plays — FG
70 yards on 11 plays — FG
9 yards on 3 plays — time ran out
What makes me curious is that Louisville showed a similar pattern.
Louisville before halftime:
FG, Punt, Punt, Punt, Punt, FG
Louisville after halftime:
TD, TD, FG, TD, TD, TD
So far, opponents have had 10 second-half possessions against Ole Miss and scored on nine.
Two games is nowhere near enough to draw a conclusion, but that is a pretty dramatic split. I’m curious whether it’s a conditioning issue, teams figuring them out as the game goes along, or Ole Miss not countering offensive adjustments well enough.
There may be simple explanations for both games.
Louisville - QB making his first start since 2022. Was clearly pissing down his leg early
Charlotte - Ole Miss was leading 27-0, the game was basically over, and LSU was next on the schedule.
This post was edited on 9/16/26 at 3:51 pm
Posted on 9/16/26 at 3:33 pm to skullhawk
If we win the toss, for the love of God, just fricking defer.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 3:38 pm to NFLSU
quote:
If we win the toss, for the love of God, just fricking defer.
Have yet to get a first down on our opening drive yet. I would love for us to start on defense for a change instead of opening the game on offense. It hasn't gone well.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 3:38 pm to skullhawk
Simple....opposing teams making adjustments at the half. Ole Miss....no
Posted on 9/16/26 at 3:39 pm to skullhawk
The Louisville QB missed on 2 easy, wide-azzed open touchdowns in the first half of that game.
Louisville should have won it going away.
Louisville should have won it going away.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 3:39 pm to skullhawk
imagine how gassed they're gonna be after running 60+ plays through 3Q
live betting the shite outta the tigers Saturday night
live betting the shite outta the tigers Saturday night
Posted on 9/16/26 at 3:40 pm to skullhawk
quote:
11 yards on 4 plays — turnover on downs
How’s this work?
And how much was it the 2nd/3rd team D responsible for the 2nd half vs Charlotte?
This post was edited on 9/16/26 at 3:41 pm
Posted on 9/16/26 at 3:42 pm to Schmelly
quote:
How’s this work?
Probably a penalty mixed in.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 3:42 pm to Schmelly
definitely need to defer on the road if they win toss
Posted on 9/16/26 at 3:54 pm to Schmelly
quote:
How’s this work?
typo on my part. Thanks for catching it.
quote:
And how much was it the 2nd/3rd team D responsible for the 2nd half vs Charlotte?
That I do not know. I'm sure some backups got reps at some point in the second half. I'm not going to watch the game, but if someone has the snap counts, that may tell you what you're looking for.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 3:59 pm to skullhawk
I have LSU losing to Mississippi 31-30...of note, I have LSU settling for four FGs - missing one. If LSU wins the red zone they win. I just have to see it happen to believe it. Red zone efficiency wins this game for either team.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 5:07 pm to skullhawk
quote:
how different their defense has looked before and after halftime.
Halftime adjustments. That's coaching. Ole Miss has a Ferrari roster and an old Asian lady driving.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 5:42 pm to Purple N Gold Blood
Chambliss is good. He is worth a lot...I hope I am wrong...but, I am not sleeping on that team and environment.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 5:50 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
Probably a penalty mixed in.
Then the yardage wouldn’t count
Posted on 9/16/26 at 5:52 pm to skullhawk
Charlotte….
Louisville’s QB couldn’t hit water if he fell
out of a boat in the 1st half. Between that and costly penalties, Louisville easily could’ve won by double digits.
Louisville’s QB couldn’t hit water if he fell
out of a boat in the 1st half. Between that and costly penalties, Louisville easily could’ve won by double digits.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 5:53 pm to skullhawk
quote:gotcha
typo on my part. Thanks for catching it.
quote:
That I do not know. I'm sure some backups got reps at some point in the second half. I'm not going to watch the game, but if someone has the snap counts, that may tell you what you're looking for.
Yeah I didn’t watch any of it. It was only 27-6 entering the 4th so I’d assume they hadn’t mailed it in yet. OM D is verrrry questionable. Especially in the secondary & especially #20
Posted on 9/16/26 at 6:32 pm to rpg37
You sound like someone that bet OM early and now trying to justify your bet. You dont have a fricking clue what you are talking about

Popular
Back to top
8











