- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
No sacks against Idaho? Not ONE?
Posted on 9/17/12 at 6:13 am
Posted on 9/17/12 at 6:13 am
Just saw this in some article (I think on CFN). True story?
14
Posted on 9/17/12 at 6:18 am to M. Physema
say it isn't true joe.
Posted on 9/17/12 at 6:19 am to Papa Tigah
They threw a lot of quick passes
Posted on 9/17/12 at 6:20 am to M. Physema
63-14. Sorry they didn't get enough practice in for you.
Posted on 9/17/12 at 6:20 am to Papa Tigah
Sounds mathematically impossible in a 63-14 arseblasting, jus sayin.
Posted on 9/17/12 at 6:22 am to M. Physema
Idaho's qb had 3 step drops and released the ball quick
all night. It's hard to get sacks like that. Expect to see
that from everybody we play this year.
all night. It's hard to get sacks like that. Expect to see
that from everybody we play this year.
Posted on 9/17/12 at 6:22 am to Prominentwon
quote:
Prominentwon
quote:
63-14. Sorry they didn't get enough practice in for you.
Posted on 9/17/12 at 6:24 am to DBeaux225
quote:
Idaho's qb had 3 step drops and released the ball quick
all night. It's hard to get sacks like that. Expect to see
that from everybody we play this year.
That would do the trick. Cheers.
Posted on 9/17/12 at 6:24 am to M. Physema
We must have been doing something right - count the interceptions! 
Posted on 9/17/12 at 6:26 am to DrD
Oh trust me, nobody's bitching - I just saw that and half thought it was a misprint or something (didn't watch - only game all year besides Towson I won't get on TV)
This post was edited on 9/17/12 at 6:27 am
Posted on 9/17/12 at 6:54 am to M. Physema
You didn't watch the game, did you.
Posted on 9/17/12 at 6:55 am to M. Physema
quote:as predicted
No sacks against Idaho
Posted on 9/17/12 at 6:57 am to Lonnie4LSU
quote:
You didn't watch the game, did you.
And how many times did you repeat second grade?
Posted on 9/17/12 at 6:59 am to M. Physema
Its a valid question/comment. We didnt blitz much (I dont think)... and they threw quick passes mostly to wide open receivers sitting in the flats.
Posted on 9/17/12 at 7:05 am to The Mick
We did some blitzing
Posted on 9/17/12 at 7:07 am to The Mick
I saw several blitzes during the game but he was throwing so quickly that our unblocked player couldn't get to him. There were no sacks but that pressure led to 4 interceptions.
Posted on 9/17/12 at 7:07 am to omegaman66
quote:I couldnt recall how much we blitzed, I dont think a whole lot. But its is odd that we got no sacks. I dont think the OP is being negative, he's just asking a fricking question.
We did some blitzing
Posted on 9/17/12 at 7:11 am to The Mick
quote:
I dont think the OP is being negative, he's just trolling
Posted on 9/17/12 at 7:12 am to The Mick
Quick drop back passing equal no sacks
Posted on 9/17/12 at 7:12 am to M. Physema
didn't need any. quick pass strategy worked to avoid sacks, but did not work to stop the Tigers. Simple as that.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News