Started By
Message

re: New number font?

Posted on 1/2/13 at 10:07 am to
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
111208 posts
Posted on 1/2/13 at 10:07 am to
Someone post side by side pic comparisons.
Posted by Macintosh
Lane State University
Member since Sep 2011
56612 posts
Posted on 1/2/13 at 10:10 am to
They look like those old smoke laval jerseys. they suck!!!
Posted by RightWingTiger
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2003
5961 posts
Posted on 1/2/13 at 10:15 am to
We're they done in the Geaux Font or just some different font than normal? Just wondering why they would change unless it was to streamline the fonts on all jerseys?
Posted by ragincajunkarl
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2012
568 posts
Posted on 1/2/13 at 10:17 am to
Germans and tl;dr Ned's to be explained to me, please.

The jersey difference wasn't that noticeable to me
Posted by jrodLSUke
Premium
Member since Jan 2011
26409 posts
Posted on 1/2/13 at 10:19 am to
quote:

Someone post side by side pic comparisons

I would like to see this as well. Anyone have a couple jersey pics handy?
Posted by Thunder Tiger
Member since Sep 2011
2608 posts
Posted on 1/2/13 at 10:22 am to
quote:

I don't like the new numbers.

Looks "Directional School'ish
Posted by Mie2cents
the round part of earth
Member since Dec 2012
3462 posts
Posted on 1/2/13 at 10:25 am to
Was that the first time that numbers were on the side of the upper arms?
Posted by Herb484
Member since Jan 2009
588 posts
Posted on 1/2/13 at 10:37 am to


Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
111208 posts
Posted on 1/2/13 at 10:40 am to
quote:

Was that the first time that numbers were on the side of the upper arms?


Nope.

Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
61298 posts
Posted on 1/2/13 at 10:46 am to
I, too, was wondering if they were supposed to be in the Geaux font for numbers. I could understand this if it's true.
Posted by Thorny
Montgomery, AL
Member since May 2008
2274 posts
Posted on 1/2/13 at 11:05 am to
Over the last 40 years, the general trend is for jersies to be more form fitting (including almost eliminating real sleeves), reducing the ability of opponents to grab them. This change is merely an extension of this trend.

Since Nike took over in 96, the shoulder stripes have been erratic. Under Dinardo, the stripes were further out, but were sometimes wedge shaped. Under Saban and Miles, the shoulder stripes were over the top of the shoulder, but didn't extend past the seam. These uniforms have the shoulder stripes extending back down around the arm holes, but since the sleeves are now so short, they really can't go under the arms. This means that they have to take up space on the front. This necessitated narrowing the numbers.

I thought it looked good. The original photos of the uniform seemed to highlight that the shoulder stripes would end up connected to the small sleeve stripes under the numbers (which, OBTW, have been there since we went to nylon mesh jersies under Cholly Mac.) When worn, this connection pretty much disappeared. The narrow numbers made the whole uniform look streamlined, but were easy to see, even from the back row of the upper deck (where I was sitting).

I would be interested in seeing a prototype using the number font from the Billy Cannon era helmets, just to see if it works.

Must be the offseason--we're talking about the uniforms again.

GEAUX TIGERS
Posted by MountainTiger
The foot of Mt. Belzoni
Member since Dec 2008
14963 posts
Posted on 1/2/13 at 11:06 am to
FWIW, I liked the new numbers.
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
35943 posts
Posted on 1/2/13 at 11:07 am to
I did not even notice.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram