- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

NCAA Football Rules Committee Proposed rule changes on Targeting and OT
Posted on 3/1/19 at 2:22 pm
Posted on 3/1/19 at 2:22 pm
LINK
Football Rules Committee proposes modifying targeting protocols
Progressive penalty and instant replay changes among recommendations
March 1, 2019 2:16pmGreg Johnson
The NCAA Football Rules Committee met this week in Indianapolis and recommended two adjustments to its targeting rules to strengthen one of the most important calls of the game.
The committee, chaired by Stanford coach David Shaw, proposed a progressive penalty for those student-athletes who receive a second targeting foul in the same season. In addition to being disqualified from that game, the player would be suspended for the team’s next contest.
The second adjustment to the targeting rule deals with the instant replay review. Instant replay officials will be directed to examine all aspects of the play and confirm the foul when all elements of targeting are present. If any element of targeting cannot be confirmed, then the replay official will overturn the targeting foul. There will not be an option for letting the call on the field stand during a targeting review.
“The targeting rule has been effective in changing player behavior,” said Steve Shaw, NCAA secretary-rules editor. “The progressive penalty is to ensure that a player re-evaluates his technique, with coaching staff support, after he receives a targeting foul. Additionally, the instant replay review changes will ensure that when a player is disqualified, it is clearly warranted.”
Before taking effect, the NCAA Playing Rules Oversight Panel must review and approve the committee’s proposals. A membership comment period will be conducted to collect feedback for committee consideration. PROP is scheduled to review these proposals April 17. The proposals will be shared with the NCAA Committee on Competitive Safeguards and Medical Aspects of Sports, which will be invited to comment.
Kickoffs
The committee conducted a robust examination of the kickoff play, including the fair-catch change made in 2018. Approximately 12 percent of all kickoff plays in the Football Bowl Subdivision were touchbacks as a result of the fair-catch rule. Data showed that overall injuries on kickoffs declined during the 2018 season.
In an effort to continue this positive momentum, the committee voted to eliminate the two-man wedge formation on all kickoffs. The group will continue to review all aspects of the kickoff play and will consider future adjustments, if needed, in the coming seasons.
Overtime
The committee proposed a tweak to the overtime rules. If a game reaches a fifth overtime, teams would run alternating 2-point plays, instead of starting another drive at the opponent’s 25-yard line. This recommendation is being made to limit the number of plays from scrimmage and to bring the game to a conclusion.
The committee also is proposing a two-minute rest period after the second and fourth overtimes. The rules for the first four overtimes would remain unchanged.
In the past four seasons, only seven games across all divisions lasted longer than four overtimes.
“The NCAA overtime rules continue to be very popular with our fans and coaches,” Steve Shaw said. “This change impacts only a small number of our contests but will eliminate plays from long overtime games.”
Blind-Side Blocks
The committee recommended a change in blind-side blocking technique. Players will not be allowed to deliver a blind-side block by attacking an opponent with forcible contact. It will be considered a personal foul and a 15-yard penalty. If the block also includes the elements of targeting, it will be a blind-side block with targeting.
Football Rules Committee proposes modifying targeting protocols
Progressive penalty and instant replay changes among recommendations
March 1, 2019 2:16pmGreg Johnson
The NCAA Football Rules Committee met this week in Indianapolis and recommended two adjustments to its targeting rules to strengthen one of the most important calls of the game.
The committee, chaired by Stanford coach David Shaw, proposed a progressive penalty for those student-athletes who receive a second targeting foul in the same season. In addition to being disqualified from that game, the player would be suspended for the team’s next contest.
The second adjustment to the targeting rule deals with the instant replay review. Instant replay officials will be directed to examine all aspects of the play and confirm the foul when all elements of targeting are present. If any element of targeting cannot be confirmed, then the replay official will overturn the targeting foul. There will not be an option for letting the call on the field stand during a targeting review.
“The targeting rule has been effective in changing player behavior,” said Steve Shaw, NCAA secretary-rules editor. “The progressive penalty is to ensure that a player re-evaluates his technique, with coaching staff support, after he receives a targeting foul. Additionally, the instant replay review changes will ensure that when a player is disqualified, it is clearly warranted.”
Before taking effect, the NCAA Playing Rules Oversight Panel must review and approve the committee’s proposals. A membership comment period will be conducted to collect feedback for committee consideration. PROP is scheduled to review these proposals April 17. The proposals will be shared with the NCAA Committee on Competitive Safeguards and Medical Aspects of Sports, which will be invited to comment.
Kickoffs
The committee conducted a robust examination of the kickoff play, including the fair-catch change made in 2018. Approximately 12 percent of all kickoff plays in the Football Bowl Subdivision were touchbacks as a result of the fair-catch rule. Data showed that overall injuries on kickoffs declined during the 2018 season.
In an effort to continue this positive momentum, the committee voted to eliminate the two-man wedge formation on all kickoffs. The group will continue to review all aspects of the kickoff play and will consider future adjustments, if needed, in the coming seasons.
Overtime
The committee proposed a tweak to the overtime rules. If a game reaches a fifth overtime, teams would run alternating 2-point plays, instead of starting another drive at the opponent’s 25-yard line. This recommendation is being made to limit the number of plays from scrimmage and to bring the game to a conclusion.
The committee also is proposing a two-minute rest period after the second and fourth overtimes. The rules for the first four overtimes would remain unchanged.
In the past four seasons, only seven games across all divisions lasted longer than four overtimes.
“The NCAA overtime rules continue to be very popular with our fans and coaches,” Steve Shaw said. “This change impacts only a small number of our contests but will eliminate plays from long overtime games.”
Blind-Side Blocks
The committee recommended a change in blind-side blocking technique. Players will not be allowed to deliver a blind-side block by attacking an opponent with forcible contact. It will be considered a personal foul and a 15-yard penalty. If the block also includes the elements of targeting, it will be a blind-side block with targeting.
This post was edited on 3/1/19 at 2:23 pm
Posted on 3/1/19 at 2:26 pm to NASA_ISS_Tiger
quote:
The committee recommended a change in blind-side blocking technique. Players will not be allowed to deliver a blind-side block by attacking an opponent with forcible contact.
This has potential to be a shite show.
This post was edited on 3/1/19 at 2:26 pm
Posted on 3/1/19 at 2:26 pm to NASA_ISS_Tiger
So instead of dialing back targeting, they are enhancing the penalties and even adding new previously legal plays that will now also be targeting. Nice 

This post was edited on 3/1/19 at 2:27 pm
Posted on 3/1/19 at 2:28 pm to NASA_ISS_Tiger
So, it still doesn't take into account the potential for a non- egregious, incidental hit with targeting elements. It would way too much to have a "flagrant" and non-flagrant version. Way to go Rules Committee.
Posted on 3/1/19 at 2:29 pm to NASA_ISS_Tiger
quote:
The committee recommended a change in blind-side blocking technique. Players will not be allowed to deliver a blind-side block by attacking an opponent with forcible contact. It will be considered a personal foul and a 15-yard penalty. If the block also includes the elements of targeting, it will be a blind-side block with targeting.
Yea this is gonna be a nightmare if this passes
Posted on 3/1/19 at 2:30 pm to lsufball19
"The second adjustment to the targeting rule deals with the instant replay review. Instant replay officials will be directed to examine all aspects of the play and confirm the foul when all elements of targeting are present. If any element of targeting cannot be confirmed, then the replay official will overturn the targeting foul. There will not be an option for letting the call on the field stand during a targeting review. "
__________________________________________________
the Devin White Rule.

__________________________________________________
the Devin White Rule.

Posted on 3/1/19 at 2:32 pm to lsufball19
Enhancing the penalty, but I don’t see where they’re adding anything else. Since it has to be confirmed and can’t just “stand”, some of the BS accidental stuff should be eliminated.
Blind side blocks may now be a penalty, based on some subjective interpretation of “attacking” or “forcible”, but targeting was already a possibility.
Blind side blocks may now be a penalty, based on some subjective interpretation of “attacking” or “forcible”, but targeting was already a possibility.
Posted on 3/1/19 at 2:38 pm to MOT
Refs couldn't even make that call against Burrow in the UCF game
Posted on 3/1/19 at 2:41 pm to nicholastiger
It should have been and I have no idea why it wasn’t. But they reviewed it to see if it was targeting, it isn’t like they didn’t even consider the possibility since it was a blind side block situation.
Posted on 3/1/19 at 3:04 pm to NASA_ISS_Tiger
Did they just completely forget that football is a damn contact sport?? Good lord..
Posted on 3/1/19 at 3:20 pm to NASA_ISS_Tiger
quote:
The committee, chaired by Stanford coach David Shaw, proposed a progressive penalty for those student-athletes who receive a second targeting foul in the same season. In addition to being disqualified from that game, the player would be suspended for the team’s next contest.


fricking progressives literally ruin everything
Posted on 3/1/19 at 3:22 pm to NASA_ISS_Tiger
quote:
The committee, chaired by Stanford coach David Shaw, proposed a progressive penalty for those student-athletes who receive a second targeting foul in the same season. In addition to being disqualified from that game, the player would be suspended for the team’s next contest
So you get a targeting penalty in game 1, and then another in a conference championship game. You miss a playoff game.
That's fricking brilliant.
Posted on 3/1/19 at 3:25 pm to RB10

Why not just play flag football instead, fricking sheesh
Posted on 3/1/19 at 3:47 pm to Codythetiger
Sarcastic a ball is on the way.
Posted on 3/1/19 at 3:47 pm to NASA_ISS_Tiger
bullshite changes.
Look, it's this simple: If a player makes a flagrant hit to the crown of the head while leading with head, that is targeting. The bullshite call where Grant Delpit made a tackle while a guy was spinning down, thus he hit his head, should not be a targeting foul. Delpit wasn't able to adjust while a guy is spinning upside down in mid air. That should not have been targeting.
Devin White's shove to the chest of Fitzgerald was also NEVER targeting. Should have never been called, and sure as hell should have never been a confirmed call.
Look, it's this simple: If a player makes a flagrant hit to the crown of the head while leading with head, that is targeting. The bullshite call where Grant Delpit made a tackle while a guy was spinning down, thus he hit his head, should not be a targeting foul. Delpit wasn't able to adjust while a guy is spinning upside down in mid air. That should not have been targeting.
Devin White's shove to the chest of Fitzgerald was also NEVER targeting. Should have never been called, and sure as hell should have never been a confirmed call.
Posted on 3/1/19 at 3:50 pm to NASA_ISS_Tiger
All that sucks. Hope it don't pass
Posted on 3/1/19 at 4:00 pm to Codythetiger
Glad they put someone from a liberal west coast school in charge of the committee. I guess no one from UCal Berkley was available.
This post was edited on 3/1/19 at 4:01 pm
Posted on 3/1/19 at 4:12 pm to FreeState
And yet NONE OF THIS AFFECTS a certain team that wears Crimson.
Just everyone else.
Just everyone else.
Posted on 3/1/19 at 4:49 pm to Pole142
quote:
Instant replay officials will be directed to examine all aspects of the play and confirm the foul when all elements of targeting are present. If any element of targeting cannot be confirmed, then the replay official will overturn the targeting foul. There will not be an option for letting the call on the field stand during a targeting review.
What the hell were they doing before??
Popular
Back to top
