Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

My NIL, Revenue Sharing, Portal Solution

Posted on 6/8/25 at 12:47 pm
Posted by SainTigeR33
Dallas, TX
Member since Nov 2019
27 posts
Posted on 6/8/25 at 12:47 pm
This is a fair and uncomplicated solution that could be the foundation of a strong governance of the NCAA:

* Players are allowed 2 transfers - one before graduation, one after graduation. No contracts!

* Colleges cannot have ANY involvement with NIL player contracts. Implement severe penalties on schools and players for violations. Force NIL collectives to disband. All NIL agreements have to be approved by the newly created clearinghouse, NIL Go.

* If a player decides to transfer, businesses have the right to opt out of the NIL player agreement, without penalty.

* Implement severe penalties for tampering.

* Revenue sharing - each sport determines a base salary for all players and additional "bonus" payments are based on playing time (snaps played, minutes, innings, etc.). So the QB will not get paid more than the starting center. He has NIL to do that on his own.

* Give the newly formed College Sports Commission the power to enforce all of the above. Have schools and players sign agreements to the above, preventing them from being able to sue the commission, EVER!


This makes everyone accountable. These athletes are being given way too much. They need to learn that their decisions have consequences; and any extra money they want to earn is 100% on them. This is the real world. Coaches can coach and recruit instead of worrying about NIL and revenue distribution.

Where am I going wrong? What did I miss? Fire away.
Posted by tigernation56
im the woods
Member since Feb 2013
4968 posts
Posted on 6/8/25 at 12:48 pm to
Poo poo
Posted by SainTigeR33
Dallas, TX
Member since Nov 2019
27 posts
Posted on 6/8/25 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

Poo poo



1st entitled brat player identified
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
76143 posts
Posted on 6/8/25 at 12:54 pm to
likely can’t do any of that without collective bargaining or congress passing an antitrust exemption.
Posted by TigerBait2008
Boulder,CO
Member since Jun 2008
35809 posts
Posted on 6/8/25 at 12:57 pm to
just
Posted by Basura Blanco
Member since Dec 2011
10818 posts
Posted on 6/8/25 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

If a player decides to transfer, businesses have the right to opt out of the NIL player agreement, without penalty.


They are 3rd party contracts. The "business" already has the ability to do this with common sense requirements of the player. If they don't, well, they are fricking morons.

quote:

All NIL agreements have to be approved by the newly created clearinghouse, NIL Go.


They can do this, but the first one denied will likely not survive a court injunction due to the supreme court ruling which, in a nutshell, says the school/ncaa can not prohibit a student athlete to be paid for their NIL.

You want to fix the current state of college football, close the portal. Period. Go back to having to sit out a year and hope it survives the coming court battle. NIL isnt the problem. Its kids going to a school strictly FOR NIL knowing they can bail if it doesnt work out.
This post was edited on 6/8/25 at 1:13 pm
Posted by CubsFanBudMan
Member since Jul 2008
5786 posts
Posted on 6/8/25 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

If a player decides to transfer, businesses have the right to opt out of the NIL player agreement, without penalty.


I don't agree with this. If a car dealership isn't smart enough to do 1 year contracts, then that's on them. If a player transfers in the middle of a contract, force them to come back for appearances that they agreed to in the contract or they risk being sued for breach.
Posted by SainTigeR33
Dallas, TX
Member since Nov 2019
27 posts
Posted on 6/8/25 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

They can do this, but the first one denied will likely not survive a court injunction due to the supreme court ruling which, in a nutshell, prohibits inhibiting a student athlete to be paid for their NIL.



RossDellinger article:
LINK

"It means that any new contract struck between an athlete and a third-party entity, such a business, brand, booster or collective, is now subject to the new Deloitte-run NIL clearinghouse. The clearinghouse, dubbed "NIL Go," is charged with evaluating NIL deals between athletes and third parties to determine their legitimacy."
Posted by JimTiger72
Member since Jun 2023
11960 posts
Posted on 6/8/25 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

My NIL, Revenue Sharing, Portal Solution


Posted by Basura Blanco
Member since Dec 2011
10818 posts
Posted on 6/8/25 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

RossDellinger article:
LINK


I get that, but......

quote:

Step 2 may be even more difficult: lawmakers producing a congressional bill to codify the settlement terms and protect the NCAA and power conferences from legal challenges over enforcement of their rules.


Basically, until this happens, any agent of any athlete denied an NIL deal by this clearinghouse will be at the courthouse the next morning to file a lawsuit. This is far far from over.
Posted by RunningJacket
Member since Dec 2008
504 posts
Posted on 6/8/25 at 1:51 pm to
You are living in a dream world if you believe any team in the top tier Weill ever get “severe penalties”. Auburn bought Cam and the Natty is on full display. Players will always be auctioned to the highest bidder whether the bids are above board or below board. When a salary cap is instituted we’ll have both legal money and under the table payments. And no one will ever be punished for tampering or under the table money. We’ve already lived thru an era of schools tattling on each other and the NCAA stopped listening long ago.
Posted by AtlantaLSUfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2009
25285 posts
Posted on 6/8/25 at 4:05 pm to
Sucks but is no worse than the current clown show, so upvote.
This post was edited on 6/8/25 at 4:05 pm
Posted by Dizz
Member since May 2008
15605 posts
Posted on 6/9/25 at 12:03 am to
quote:

This is the real world.


quote:

These athletes are being given way too much.


In the real world you are worth what someone will pay you.
Posted by Tvilletiger
PVB
Member since Oct 2015
5750 posts
Posted on 6/9/25 at 2:56 am to
This sounds pretty solid but here is what people are missing.
This is a court issue. It’s a legal issue. This has all happened so that athletes cannot be stopped by the ncaa from making money off their name, image, and likeness.
The schools paying players is a whole different thing.
This is going to end up back in court I have a feeling.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram