- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU will host Fla in BR 11/19...LSU will play at Florida in 2017
Posted on 10/13/16 at 4:28 pm to geauxpurple
Posted on 10/13/16 at 4:28 pm to geauxpurple
So , does this set a precedent? First time a team/community loses a home game(we now have one less home game next year) as a result of a natural disaster that happened 3 states away
Posted on 10/13/16 at 4:29 pm to pensacola
quote:
LSU will play at Florida in 2017.
And 2018, right?
Posted on 10/13/16 at 4:29 pm to jamalsdeck
Ya'll MFers acting like our home advantage has even mattered past the 2nd quarter this year.
This post was edited on 10/13/16 at 4:36 pm
Posted on 10/13/16 at 4:29 pm to Hat Tricks
quote:
We will have 5 SEC games on the road.
One is Mississippi State
Posted on 10/13/16 at 4:29 pm to Team Vote
Please recall that LSU floated NUMEROUS scenarios to get the game played IN Florida, as well in adjacent venues. Florida sat on its hands, as did the SEC, and in effect, rejected LSU's proposals. Talk about concessions! Go back and read what LSU offered to do! 
Posted on 10/13/16 at 4:30 pm to snackpack
quote:
Is a&m still on thur?
That's the other shoe I'm waiting to see drop. LSU's "player safety" talking point still stands, even if it's not three straight road games in 12 days.
Posted on 10/13/16 at 4:31 pm to lsu2006
Why do you care about playing Florida this year at the expense of a tougher road schedule next year??
Unless you expect LSU to run the table? We still lose out on a game this season because of them.
I care more about our future than a possible meaningless game that has us give up another game
I wanted UF at home badly next season
Would have been epic
Unless you expect LSU to run the table? We still lose out on a game this season because of them.
I care more about our future than a possible meaningless game that has us give up another game
I wanted UF at home badly next season
Would have been epic
Posted on 10/13/16 at 4:32 pm to 7nette
Not sure why it would matter how the crowd was PAST the SECOND half... The stadium would be empty.
Posted on 10/13/16 at 4:33 pm to J Murdah
YES
And also in 2018. We'll see a lot of Gainesville in the near future, unless they have another < gasp > hurricane.
And also in 2018. We'll see a lot of Gainesville in the near future, unless they have another < gasp > hurricane.
This post was edited on 10/13/16 at 4:36 pm
Posted on 10/13/16 at 4:35 pm to ffhouston
We're not just talking home field advantage. Other factors are player safety and a huge negative financial impact for the BR community with one less home game next year.
Posted on 10/13/16 at 4:36 pm to ffhouston
quote:
Is a&m still on thur?
That's the other shoe I'm waiting to see drop. LSU's "player safety" talking point still stands, even if it's not three straight road games in 12 days.
I'd guess A&M on Thursday is still happening. This was the only solution that doesn't affect other SEC teams schedule.
Posted on 10/13/16 at 4:36 pm to FLObserver
This would be great news if we were still undefeated and had looked like the contender we were suppose to be this year. Even if we continue to play lights out like we saw against Mizzou and somehow win out, even as an SEC champion we would only be 10-2 and idk if that will be good enough to get us into the dance.
Id rather have said screw it and keep the future games as they were. However we'd then be on the hook for some of the blame ourselves if we ended up beating Bama and winning out but they still went over us to the sec champ with a higher win percentage.
To play one less conference game this year is a gamble Id be willing to take cause I don't think LSU will win out. But the melt on this board calling for Alleva's head would be astronomical if we do win out and that situation occurred. The only reason he should accept this deal is if he truly believes this team can go undefeated the rest of the way.
Id rather have said screw it and keep the future games as they were. However we'd then be on the hook for some of the blame ourselves if we ended up beating Bama and winning out but they still went over us to the sec champ with a higher win percentage.
To play one less conference game this year is a gamble Id be willing to take cause I don't think LSU will win out. But the melt on this board calling for Alleva's head would be astronomical if we do win out and that situation occurred. The only reason he should accept this deal is if he truly believes this team can go undefeated the rest of the way.
Posted on 10/13/16 at 4:38 pm to pensacola
Posted on 10/13/16 at 4:39 pm to Number2
'17 & '18 we play in Gainesville; we got screwed.
Posted on 10/13/16 at 4:40 pm to TopWaterTiger
This sure makes it sound like we're paying the SA buyout out of pocket...
LINK
quote:
With the SEC’s decision, LSU will now buy out the home contest against South Alabama and replace it with the game against the Gators
LINK
Posted on 10/13/16 at 4:42 pm to lsu2006
quote:
We get to play a game that up until now we'd all assumed was never going to get played. It's mutually beneficial and I'm cool with it.
I don't see it as mutually beneficial, I mean break it down
2016
Pros:
- Homefield advantage against an SEC opponent that was a road game in 2016
Neutral:
- Subbed out a home game for a home game ($$$)
Cons:
- Schedule got harder without an appreciable SOS boost since we're playing the same teams
2017:
Cons:
- Lost a home game ($$$)
- Lost homefield advantage against Florida
Counters to the only pro in the 2016 season:
- There were alternatives to this such as just playing the game in the swamp like we were supposed to but Florida dragged their feet on it
- There were alternatives that involved getting Arkansas/Georgia involved that would've been messy for the league office but a neutral and fair trade for us (And to be fair I don't think moving the UF/UGA game was ever feasible but hey)
- We're teetering on the edge of playoff elimination as it is, one more loss and we're mathematically gone, and the odds of us running the table and getting in this year are slim as it is. What exactly do we gain by favoring this season to next season?
- Florida is benefitting by moving the game later, moreso than us having homefield advantage by letting their players heal, so it's barely a concession on their part (In a zero-sum game like college football the other guy's gain is your loss!)
- Florida theoretically would've gotten insurance money for the game being cancelled so with their revenue concerns out of the way a Division tie breaker instead of the regular vague bylaws for this year only would've been the most fair way to handle it for everyone involved
Frankly I think we got screwed. It was a pretty clever maneuver by UF and I think their athletic department deserves some props post-game cancellation for doing whatever it takes to preserve UF's interests, but our guys dropped the ball and left us hanging. It won't really affect 2018 because we would have been in the swamp anyway but for the 2017 season we lost an advantage that we should have had for no particular reason but to give a concession for Florida's concession. It's a bad trade.
edit: also that ended up being a wall of text dang
This post was edited on 10/13/16 at 4:43 pm
Posted on 10/13/16 at 4:43 pm to Prominentwon
The board didn't complain, certain posters did
Posted on 10/13/16 at 4:45 pm to Ollie Cherpussie
So how do we feel 'bout Bama, Arky, Fla. & A&M all in a row???
Posted on 10/13/16 at 4:45 pm to Meaux Bettah
I made plans to go out of town on the 19th with the assumption we would be playing USA, not UF.
:banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
Popular
Back to top


0








