re: LSU suspended their coach based on nothing but a Pete Thamel story.

quote:

---

You said that the other night.

---

And you were trolling the other night just like you are tonight.



You have a garbage reason for wanting Wade fired, that's been pointed out, even admitted by you, in this thread multiple times. Yet you persist with riling people up.



All you're doing is spamming the board at this point.


Hopefully soon, you get a new sig quote.

Good evening.

Nite

quote:

---

can’t defend his position

---

He doesn't have to defend his position. He dislikes Wade, like I said, that's blatantly obvious but he if would just admit it, he's entitled to his opinion, then all this other garbage is unnecessary.


But he gets some sort of weird satisfaction by going against the general consensus, ticking off posters, derailing threads for pages and pages, often even against his own posts, even when they are shown to him in full, he says, "you're misrepresenting what I said ", just for kicks.


Very odd.

Just admit it, you hate Wade. You want him fired because you hate his success as you think it makes Orgeron look less successful.

You want LSU to hire a shitty basketball coach so you can tout Orgeron’s 9-3 seasons as a success.

You would be totally on the opposite side if it were Orgeron.

You’re not an LSU fan, you’re an Orgeron fan.

quote:

---

Just admit it, you hate Wade. You want him fired because you hate his success as you think it makes Orgeron look less successful.

You would be totally on the opposite side if it were Orgeron.

---

Trying so hard

quote:

---

He thinks to highly of himself for that. He’s here to argue and attempt to belittle people who disagree with him. The Wade take is just a vehicle for him to spew his filth.

---

quote:

---

You’re stupidity is beyond measurement. I understand mommy and daddy haven’t exposed you to the real world and how legal matters work but one day when you grow up you might understand. You sound so ignorant if you weren’t such a pompous little prick I’d actually feel sorry for you.

---

quote:

---

Everytime I strike a nerve

---

I’m the one who struck a nerve, hence your melt.

quote:

---

The NCAA does not require "ironclad" proof to determine a ruling.

The NCAA does not need proof.

---

Dale Brown says "Hello"

quote:

---

The NCAA does not need proof. They are not a court of law. If they think it has occurred, then it did.

---

So then you'd agree, LSU lighting itself on fire and screaming "Guilty!" "Guilty!" "Guilty!" is probably not the best strategy in the world.

quote:

---

I suspect LSU is aware of additional information since the first media publication of the FBI wiretaps.

---

I suspect you are wrong as rain.
I suspect that because all known facts stand against your premise.

In fact, you have nothing whatsoever to back the supposition except your own stubborn adherence to a belief that FKing-Alleva could not POSSIBLY be so stupid as to suspend Wade based on a hack newspaper article. Unfortunately, both history and present circumstance tell a different tale.

E.g., IF as you say, FKing-Alleva had more daming information against Wade
* * * THEY WOULD HAVE NEVER REINSTATED SMART * * * ,
and they would have dismissed Wade. Further, no competent administration invites an outside adversarial source into an initial meeting where everyone together will be hearing facts for the first time. Even if you set aside obvious entrapment issues for Wade (or others) with a Federal Trial pending, including a third party adversary in an initial and potentially controversial meeting is stupid beyond belief.

What should be striking is this behavior is not isolated. It is not unique. It is the same stuff we've seen manifested time and time again with the FKing-Alleva team.

It is not the stuff of a competent Administration.
It is not the stuff of a mediocre Administration.
It is stuff of imbeciles.
FKing-Alleva are imbeciles.

The fact that either of them are still in LSU employment is a fking embarrassment.

Right. The one who is being childish is me.