Started By
Message

re: LSU not ranked by ESPN as one of 8 "Blue-Blood" CFB Programs

Posted on 11/15/19 at 8:15 pm to
Posted by dittohead
Member since Sep 2009
104 posts
Posted on 11/15/19 at 8:15 pm to
Agree with the top five - those are the blue bloods. Texas and Michigan are not blue bloods. They are programs that have won consistently but are hardly ever elite. LSU is a lot close to Michigan and Texas, than those programs are to an Ohio State or Alabama.
Posted by El Magnifico
La casa de tu mamá
Member since Jan 2014
7017 posts
Posted on 11/15/19 at 9:03 pm to
Let's see: Alabama, Ohio State, Oklahoma, USC, Texas, Notre Dame, Michigan,Tennessee, Penn State,Nebraska. New kids on the block, Clemson, Florida, Florida State, Miami. I'll take 9 all day.
Posted by TigerVespamon
Member since Dec 2010
6966 posts
Posted on 11/15/19 at 9:21 pm to
quote:

current coach Les Miles
Posted by cypresstiger
The South
Member since Aug 2008
12501 posts
Posted on 11/15/19 at 9:38 pm to
Read the OP. The survey was in 2016
Posted by Swampcat
Member since Dec 2003
11666 posts
Posted on 11/15/19 at 9:45 pm to
It’s all relative!!! Think if LSU had Notre Dame-schedule the last 60 freaking years!!!!!
Posted by Swampcat
Member since Dec 2003
11666 posts
Posted on 11/15/19 at 9:46 pm to
Lol, we literally have the #1 team in our conference!
Posted by TigerVespamon
Member since Dec 2010
6966 posts
Posted on 11/15/19 at 10:11 pm to
quote:

Read the OP. The survey was in 2016
Thanks for making my point that this is old news.

This post was edited on 11/15/19 at 10:12 pm
Posted by LsuNav
Sacramento
Member since Mar 2008
1644 posts
Posted on 11/15/19 at 10:16 pm to
Texas over Nebraska?
Posted by CGLeBleu
Member since Sep 2019
393 posts
Posted on 11/15/19 at 10:21 pm to
No way...that’s great...WE LANDED ON THE MOON!!!!

-Lloyd Christmas

LINK


This post was edited on 11/15/19 at 10:22 pm
Posted by LSU2a
SWLA to Dallas
Member since Aug 2012
2872 posts
Posted on 11/15/19 at 10:24 pm to
LSU will move up to 8 after the Orgeron Era.
Posted by JOJO Hammer
Member since Nov 2010
12219 posts
Posted on 11/15/19 at 10:28 pm to
Anyone actually mad about this has only followed LSU football since 2001.
Posted by SelaTiger
Member since Aug 2016
20635 posts
Posted on 11/15/19 at 10:28 pm to
Nebraska hasn’t done shite in the last 20 years. They need to be taken off that list.
Posted by SoulGlo
Shinin' Through
Member since Dec 2011
17248 posts
Posted on 11/15/19 at 10:30 pm to
This is from 2016 lol
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
84097 posts
Posted on 11/15/19 at 10:44 pm to
I actually care about these things and have thought a lot about them and I have no problem with nine. I’d also say we were at around 14 around 20 years ago so the trajectory is excellent.
Posted by fab4lsu
NC, SC and La.
Member since Dec 2007
902 posts
Posted on 11/15/19 at 10:58 pm to
quote:

I have no problem with nine. I’d also say we were at around 14 around 20 years ago so the trajectory is excellent.


Yeah, I can remember being so excited to even be included in the National Championship discussion 2003...especially after suffering through the Hallman years.
This post was edited on 11/15/19 at 11:04 pm
Posted by wasteland
City of peace
Member since Apr 2011
5907 posts
Posted on 11/15/19 at 11:14 pm to
Michigan not in the top tier is weird to me. 9 is great. Theres a few behind us that could be ahead.


Wtf is aggie doing there?
Posted by CheerWhine
A little bit of Mardi Gras
Member since Apr 2014
77059 posts
Posted on 11/15/19 at 11:21 pm to
I can't really argue with that, although Nebraska hasn't done anything in a while. We'll just have to start breaking through this year.
Posted by SportTiger1
Stonewall, LA
Member since Feb 2007
29720 posts
Posted on 11/15/19 at 11:43 pm to
quote:

To say LSU isn’t a blue blood is assinine. There’s more than 8 blue bloods in college football period.

Nah man. If you ask a random college football fan from the middle of no where, what are the most historic winning programs....lsu ain't making most people's lists
Posted by SportTiger1
Stonewall, LA
Member since Feb 2007
29720 posts
Posted on 11/15/19 at 11:46 pm to
quote:

If you're going to use historic relevancexl as the criteria, Minnesota and Yale should be bluebloods.

But it's also based on longevity. Those top 8 programs, save Nebraska, always seem to be at the top at least every 10-15 years. They never completely disappear off the radar.
Posted by noonan
Nassau Bay, TX
Member since Aug 2005
36951 posts
Posted on 11/15/19 at 11:59 pm to
quote:

My question is, if LSU can finish off this season with Burrow winning the Heisman and the Tigers winning the NC, does LSU deserve to jump Nebraska (#8) and/or Texas (#7) into blue bood territory?


I don't think so. Imo, a blue blood has nothing to do with how successful a program is right now. It's more about what they did in the past. It's the same programs that the media props up every year, or talks about how college football is better when so'n so is relevant.

It would have to be a number of years before LSU could break into that group
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram