Started By
Message

re: LSU benefactor of bad call

Posted on 10/4/09 at 7:22 pm to
Posted by el tigre
your heart
Member since Sep 2003
49712 posts
Posted on 10/4/09 at 7:22 pm to
it's ok to be wrong. it happened to me one time.

just don't make retarded arguments trying too hard to be the "objective tiger fan" and end up looking foolish and bitter.
Posted by el tigre
your heart
Member since Sep 2003
49712 posts
Posted on 10/4/09 at 7:24 pm to
quote:


you dont know shite about what im saying. the play would have been different on both sides of the ball bc of the situations. just bc you break free on one play and score doesn't mean the same thing happens on every spot on the field.


well no shite.

but it's insane to say that there is no way we could have gained 15 more yards in 46 seconds and the only reason that we won was the penalty....esp when we only needed a FG.
Posted by lsuoldschool
Weston, La.
Member since Jan 2008
159 posts
Posted on 10/4/09 at 7:24 pm to
quote:

Again, how do you know that the kicker wouldnt have punched it through the back of the endzone? Or that the kicker wouldnt have squibbed it? All of the strategy changed after that 15yrs. Would Trindon have taken the kick back the whole way, its quite possible...

Like it or not, you people need to take off the purple and gold glasses and admit the penalty prob saved our asses.


If you didn't have the computer then we wouldn't have to consider foolish "what ifs". If the frog didn't hop it would bump its butt on the ground. The call was made, Trindon returned it well and Ga had the opportunity to tackle him and they didn't. In the same situation we made a good tackle. Charles made a good run and got the TD. All of the what ifs and speculation about this will not change the facts. LSU won the game and GA was not cheated
Posted by CRAZY 4 LSU
Member since Apr 2006
16903 posts
Posted on 10/4/09 at 7:25 pm to
But bro the LSU would have been in the same O and UGA in their base D. I doubt a different call would have been made. At those points on the field you don't see much change schematically like you do on the goal line. It doesn't matter we fricking won I don't give a shite the better team won imho.
Posted by rockchlkjayhku11
Cincinnati, OH
Member since Aug 2006
36518 posts
Posted on 10/4/09 at 7:26 pm to
oh definitely. you guys still win the ballgame. plenty of time and only needed a FG. not arguing with the outcome.
Posted by rockchlkjayhku11
Cincinnati, OH
Member since Aug 2006
36518 posts
Posted on 10/4/09 at 7:27 pm to
ok cool. no one is arguing that whatsoever.
Posted by McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
31639 posts
Posted on 10/4/09 at 7:30 pm to
quote:

You mean the incompletion the refs called correctly?


read the rules, and it ain't that cut and dried. but overall, this is a waste of time. Next week at 7cst we'll start to see what we can do to make this an SECCG season.
This post was edited on 10/4/09 at 7:31 pm
Posted by el tigre
your heart
Member since Sep 2003
49712 posts
Posted on 10/4/09 at 7:30 pm to
quote:

oh definitely. you guys still win the ballgame. plenty of time and only needed a FG. not arguing with the outcome.


gotcha.

yeah, you aren't the one trying to flame with retarded shite like this:

quote:

But some of yall need to wake the frick up and admit that the celebration call on GA prob saved our asses
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
80361 posts
Posted on 10/4/09 at 7:33 pm to
quote:

trying to flame






Posted by coloradoBengal
Member since Sep 2007
32608 posts
Posted on 10/4/09 at 7:36 pm to
Every close game is partially decided by the officiating. In every close game you can find a call or no call of some kind and attach a bunch of shoulda coulda wouldas to it.

Its like in the fight game, if you don't want the judges to frick you, then knock the bitch out.
Posted by hancheye
McKinney, Texas
Member since Oct 2007
699 posts
Posted on 10/4/09 at 7:37 pm to
NC_Tigah: No, someone on page 2 or 3 made the statement, in response to the bitching by the Ga. fans "well what about the no call on the safety", thats why I was compelled to correct him.
Posted by McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
31639 posts
Posted on 10/4/09 at 7:40 pm to
quote:

Any time during the game, quarterback A10, who is not outside the
frame of the body of normal tackle position toward a sideline and
is attempting to save yardage, intentionally throws a desperation
forward pass that falls incomplete where no eligible Team A player
has a reasonable opportunity to catch it. RULING: Intentional
grounding. Penalty—Loss of down at the spot of the foul. The clock
starts on the snap (Rule 3-2-5-a).
Posted by DocBugbear
Arlington, Texas
Member since Mar 2008
7967 posts
Posted on 10/4/09 at 7:47 pm to
IMHO, on the replay he just made it outside the tackle box. When I first saw it, I thought we got robbed. When I saw the replay, it looked like a good call.

The whole celebration rule is stupid, but the worst call was the RS "fumble".
Posted by Methuselah
On da Riva
Member since Jan 2005
23350 posts
Posted on 10/4/09 at 7:57 pm to
At this point arguing what woulda or coulda happened is like arguing about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.

Course it could be the refs just gave us that call cause when they try to screw us at Aubie or Bammer that can point back to the celebration call against UGA
Posted by CougarBait
on catnip in a cougar's den
Member since Jun 2007
1977 posts
Posted on 10/4/09 at 8:00 pm to
The call was stupid. You don't want the officials deciding or influencing a game like that on a petty call.
Posted by Duzz
Houston
Member since Feb 2008
9975 posts
Posted on 10/4/09 at 8:05 pm to
It would have been fair to UGA only if we let them have Trindon on that kick off return. Take off his Tiger jersey, give him a dog one and then let him return it for them. After that let Scott put on that dog jersey and run it against us. THAT would have been fair. Same situation then against our defenders.
Posted by DocBugbear
Arlington, Texas
Member since Mar 2008
7967 posts
Posted on 10/4/09 at 8:07 pm to
quote:

At this point arguing what woulda or coulda happened is like arguing about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.


That would be stupid. Everyone knows that exactly 4,327 angels can dance on the head of a pin.
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 10/4/09 at 8:11 pm to
The word you want is "beneficiary."
Posted by MN Tigah
Hastings, MN
Member since Mar 2008
535 posts
Posted on 10/4/09 at 8:13 pm to
quote:

Miles didn't call the play and neither did Crowton. Jefferson got on the phone with Crowton and changed the play from a play-action to LaFell into Scott's run.

But he definitely would not have done this if we were 15 yards out of field goal range.


I agree with you here. The Tigers would probably have been passing from the spread if they were still on UGAs 48 with second and five to go. I don't think Crowton would have bothered with play action in that case.

If you rememberthe Miss State game, LSU paid a high price for celebration in that game. Anyway, we won that one with a goal line stand. Georgia can only look to their defense for allowing LSU into field goal range.

I don't like the subjective nature of the celebration penalties. In my opinion, they are too subjective. In the case of AJ Green, he didn't do much to deserve the penalty. He did just enough that, when his actions were compounded by a whole slew (including Green) of Bulldogs nearly ran over the ref while celebrating, the ref got pissed and reached for the flag! I watched it, and I believe the disrespect for the official triggered the flag.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram