- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 11/15/13 at 11:12 am to LSURussian
If we trim the coaching staff by one, can't we keep 36 players? Any suggestions on which coach to cut?
Posted on 11/15/13 at 11:13 am to Choupique19
Dunn easily
Posted on 11/15/13 at 11:14 am to TigerCub
quote:Joe Broussard was on last season's roster so I'm not sure how that works. Of course, we only carried 33 players on the roster last year so having Broussard on it didn't cost anyone else a spot.
I don't know if they have to count Reynolds towards the 35 or not.
Posted on 11/15/13 at 11:21 am to LSURussian
I think if you start the spring knowing the player is injured and will not be active at all, then he does not require a spot on the 35; but once they make the official 35 man roster, injury or whatever else, you don't get the spot back. I believe the rosters are officially set on Feb 13th.
ETA: The exception is any player on a scholarship (max of 27) must count to the roster of 35. So basically anyone who will be injured for the whole season would have forfeit his scholarship for that semester (or year maybe?) in order not to count against the 35.
ETA: The exception is any player on a scholarship (max of 27) must count to the roster of 35. So basically anyone who will be injured for the whole season would have forfeit his scholarship for that semester (or year maybe?) in order not to count against the 35.
This post was edited on 11/15/13 at 11:26 am
Posted on 11/15/13 at 11:28 am to AstroTiger
That's kinds of what I thought. What another stupid NCAA rule.
Posted on 11/15/13 at 11:28 am to AstroTiger
quote:Don't even get me started on this bullshite.
a scholarship
Posted on 11/15/13 at 11:37 am to ell_13
Replies:
ETA: nvm
quote:
666
ETA: nvm
This post was edited on 11/15/13 at 11:38 am
Posted on 11/15/13 at 11:38 am to ell_13
quote:
Don't even get me started on this bullshite.
No. Go ahead and start on that bullshite.
Posted on 11/15/13 at 12:25 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
11.5 limit may be the most ridiculous rule in all of the NCAA.
Posted on 11/15/13 at 1:10 pm to Geauxlden Eagle
11.7*
Yeah it's absolutely ludicrous
Yeah it's absolutely ludicrous
Posted on 11/15/13 at 1:16 pm to ell_13
Yeah don't get me started on why softball has more schollys than baseball.
Posted on 11/15/13 at 1:22 pm to TigerCub
Because there is no minor league softball
Posted on 11/15/13 at 1:26 pm to AstroTiger
a scholarship
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't even get me started on this bull shite.
quote:
Yeah it's absolutely ludicrous
suuuuucks!
This post was edited on 11/15/13 at 1:33 pm
Posted on 11/15/13 at 1:34 pm to TigerCub
Title IX + "Non-Revenue Sport"
And 11.7 is JUST for D1.
D2- 9 Max Allowed
D3- 0
NJCAA- 24
NAIA - 12
Why so many for NJCAA and NAIA? Most of the schools don't have football competing for scholarships vs. girl sports.
Also, It's at the schools discretion to match the scholarship numbers (Title IX). Meaning most schools don't use the max for this reason or financial limitations.
And 11.7 is JUST for D1.
D2- 9 Max Allowed
D3- 0
NJCAA- 24
NAIA - 12
Why so many for NJCAA and NAIA? Most of the schools don't have football competing for scholarships vs. girl sports.
Also, It's at the schools discretion to match the scholarship numbers (Title IX). Meaning most schools don't use the max for this reason or financial limitations.
Posted on 11/15/13 at 1:43 pm to ell_13
Reading through some of the bylaws and I found a fairly new rule that I was not aware of...
Probably doesn't come into play too often, but it is something I was unaware of.
quote:
15.5.4.1.2 Exception—Final Year of Eligibility and Not Previously Aided.
An institution may provide less than 25 percent of an equivalency to a student-athlete, provided the student-athlete is in the final year of eligibility and has not previously received athletically related financial aid in baseball. (Adopted: 4/26/12 effective 8/1/12)
Probably doesn't come into play too often, but it is something I was unaware of.
Posted on 11/15/13 at 1:48 pm to AstroTiger
quote:So the guy who wasn't good enough to receive a portion of the 11.7 to start and still wasn't drafted after his 3rd year?
final year of eligibility and has not previously received athletically related financial aid
Posted on 11/15/13 at 1:50 pm to ell_13
Or, it could be a 5th year senior who has used up his TOPS eligibility.
Posted on 11/15/13 at 1:52 pm to ell_13
Kinda. Pretty much throwing a loyalty bone if you give a final year guy between 0 and 24% of a scholarship.
Posted on 11/15/13 at 1:57 pm to LSURussian
Good call there.
My point though is it doesn't help the quality, middle-of-the-road guys who aren't studs but are good enough to start by year two for the best programs in the country. Those guys get the shaft because 2-4 fulls go to ace pitchers and can't-miss position players and the rest (~8 scholarships) have to be split among 20 guys. Then, 10 or so have nothing at all.
My point though is it doesn't help the quality, middle-of-the-road guys who aren't studs but are good enough to start by year two for the best programs in the country. Those guys get the shaft because 2-4 fulls go to ace pitchers and can't-miss position players and the rest (~8 scholarships) have to be split among 20 guys. Then, 10 or so have nothing at all.
This post was edited on 11/15/13 at 2:05 pm
Page 34 of 745
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News