- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
LSU 5th in total offense in SEC play
Posted on 9/24/09 at 1:38 pm
Posted on 9/24/09 at 1:38 pm
in SEC play, we are 5th in YPG. Only nine teams have seen SEC play thus far, and this is how they stack up
..Team.....YPG
1 Aub...... 589
2 Ark....... 485
3 USC...... 427
4 UGA...... 419
5 LSU....... 326
6 UF........ 323
7 Miss St... 319
8 UT......... 210
9 Vandy.... 183.5
..Team.....YPG
1 Aub...... 589
2 Ark....... 485
3 USC...... 427
4 UGA...... 419
5 LSU....... 326
6 UF........ 323
7 Miss St... 319
8 UT......... 210
9 Vandy.... 183.5
Posted on 9/24/09 at 1:48 pm to ultratiger89
Not too shabby when you consider the conditions and opp. and how conservative they were with JJ at Washington, the rain at Vandy IMHO.
Who would have thought we would have edged out Fla.???
Who would have thought we would have edged out Fla.???
Posted on 9/24/09 at 1:52 pm to omegaman66
quote:
Who would have thought we would have edged out Fla.???
In all fairness.. TN > Vandy
Posted on 9/24/09 at 1:54 pm to omegaman66
quote:few number of plays
Not too shabby when you consider the
quote:
at Washington,
Posted on 9/24/09 at 1:54 pm to bmy
not by much.
Vandy would be better if they were playing McKenzie Adams at QB IMO FWIW>
Vandy would be better if they were playing McKenzie Adams at QB IMO FWIW>
Posted on 9/24/09 at 1:57 pm to omegaman66
quote:
Not too shabby when you consider the conditions and opp. and how conservative they were with JJ at Washington
am i misreading the list? i thought it was saying offensive production against SEC teams.
Posted on 9/24/09 at 1:57 pm to ultratiger89
Vandy was also in the rain.
On the other hand, have to expect Ole Miss, Bama, and UK to all top 326.
Posted on 9/24/09 at 2:02 pm to triplesauce
am i misreading the list? i thought it was saying offensive production against SEC teams
This....
Am I missing something here. If they are showing average yards per game rendered, then would it be best is Vandy's spot?
LINK?
This....
Am I missing something here. If they are showing average yards per game rendered, then would it be best is Vandy's spot?
LINK?
Posted on 9/24/09 at 2:09 pm to Flyin Tighas
this is SEC play only. I looked up the stats from all the games played thus far and put them in an excel spreadsheet to see were they stood.
go to secports.com and you can get the info there.
quote:
LINK?
go to secports.com and you can get the info there.
This post was edited on 9/24/09 at 2:13 pm
Posted on 9/24/09 at 2:11 pm to bmy
(no message)
This post was edited on 9/24/09 at 2:12 pm
Posted on 9/24/09 at 2:36 pm to ultratiger89
So the avg SEC offense is 350.25 yds per game. Which means we're a below avg SEC offense. Somehow, that doesnt make me feel as good as you seem to feel.
Posted on 9/24/09 at 2:38 pm to RobbBobb
well if you are going to feel this bad after 1 SEC game then no one can help you.
Posted on 9/24/09 at 3:59 pm to triplesauce
quote:
Vandy was also in the rain.
On the other hand, have to expect Ole Miss, Bama, and UK to all top 326.
I think we can expect LSU to top 326 from here on out. Time for the training wheels to come off IMHO.
Posted on 9/24/09 at 4:15 pm to Catch
quote:Looks that way to me.
So if Im reading that right we'd also be tied for 1st with Florida in SEC defense?
Posted on 9/24/09 at 4:17 pm to RANDY44
Perfect example of how insufficient data can lie....
you can ask 2 people something and if they both agree, say that 100% of the people agree.
neither in such case, nor in this case, is there enough data to really derive a meaning from it.....way too early.
you can also say that we produced 45% fewer yards than # 1.....it is a nice list to follow, but I do not see much meaning in it yet...a couple of more games will help
you can ask 2 people something and if they both agree, say that 100% of the people agree.
neither in such case, nor in this case, is there enough data to really derive a meaning from it.....way too early.
you can also say that we produced 45% fewer yards than # 1.....it is a nice list to follow, but I do not see much meaning in it yet...a couple of more games will help
This post was edited on 9/24/09 at 4:31 pm
Posted on 9/24/09 at 4:40 pm to Team Fish
quote:
OLE MISS ???
havent played a SEC game yet
Posted on 9/24/09 at 6:11 pm to rbdallas
quote:
Perfect example of how insufficient data can lie....
ding ding ding, we have a winner. this was the point of this thread. people posting LSU is dead last in the SEC is comparing the first three games of the season (not the SEC) where a lot of teams have been playing FCS teams (which will pad their stats). I have to admit that AU putting up 589 against moo u is pretty impressive.
Posted on 9/24/09 at 8:03 pm to ultratiger89
Those stats don't mean shite considering the lack of quality in teams the SEC schedules.
Posted on 9/24/09 at 8:05 pm to Geauxtiga
quote:
Those stats don't mean shite considering the lack of quality in teams the SEC schedules.
my point exactly!
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News