re: LSP release Lacy info in reference to Lacy attorney misinformation

Wrong. He has data, likely from an insurance app on her car, but he calculated the speed of the truck using the brief footage of the truck whipping into the car wash parking lot- not its actual speed prior to braking. He admitted this.

Watching the video Funyong and the victim stop on impact and block
both lanes

No one else hits them

everyone else is far enough away to break and avoid a pileup. The only cars Funyons was in danger of hitting were the Gold Truck and the victim.

Both of which were because of her own actions.

Lacy isn’t even the first car to approach, the accident scene. that’s haw far away he was when Funyons killed a guy.

Fair enough, but the “apron” you are showing ends before the point of impact.

No.

I’m not black
I dont hate cops. I hate bad cops like
i hate bad doctors and bad cooks.

I dont really like Lacy. My initial reaction to hearing he was arrested was very negative.

quote:

---

The only cars Funyons was in danger of hitting were the Gold Truck and the victim.

---

Correct. She had to choose, in less than a half a second to rear end the truck or try to veer around him. Maybe if she hit the truck more people die? But no one dies if Lacy doesn’t try to pass 4 cars illegally.


I’m here all week.

It doesn’t matter because there’s no actual evidence of your claim, but I’ll bite.

A car in front of you locks his brakes and you instinctively try to veer around him rather than rear end him. That’s not unreasonable. Further, there’s is no defined safe distance or time interval articulated anywhere in Louisiana law. Only a distance deemed “reasonable and prudent" distance based on conditions that can be observed and cited by law enforcement.

You are chasing a dragon. But I know you don’t care and you’ll die on your hill, so I’ll just let you die.

quote:

---

Correct. She had to choose, in less than a half a second to rear end the truck or try to veer around him.

---

But you shouldn’t have half a second to decide how to hit someone.
if you’re following at a safe distance you slow down and stop.

So was she following at a safe distance

quote:

---

Further, there’s is no defined safe distance or time interval articulated anywhere in Louisiana law.

---

The law is:

quote:

---

The driver of a motor vehicle shall not follow another vehicle more closely than is reasonable and prudent, having due regard for the speed of such vehicle and the traffic upon and the condition of the highway.

---

Somehow being left with the option of slamming into a truck and slamming into reason traffic doesn’t seem reasonable or prudent.

quote:

---

So we are right back where we started. A subjective and ambiguous rule that you are assuming was violated based on no evidence.

---

Could she stop and avoid hitting the car in front of her?

It depends. As I’ve stated, using the old one car length per 10MPH standard, she would have had one second until impact at 50MPH. Thats nothing.

And you still haven’t answered my question. Why is gold truck not liable if, as you claim, Lacy had safely returned to the southbound lane well before any issues arose? Had he stayed put, all is well right?