- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSP release Lacy info in reference to Lacy attorney misinformation
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:44 pm to zuluboudreaux
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:44 pm to zuluboudreaux
The gold truck was making a completely legal turn which typically requires someone to press the brakes to slow down before completing the turn
0
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:44 pm to MikeTheTiger71
quote:sorry I meant 150 yards. I'll correct it. My guess is that he was around that distance when he was still passing in the left lane. 150 yards is not far when moving at the speed he essentially going. Like about 3.7 seconds behind the wreck or in front of the car that swerved.
not 150 feet.
330 yards is still aroind 3.5 seconds. Still rationally close enough to make someone shift a lane.
I'll go on a limb here and everyone ask this question
If you are in the car that swerved shoes. Why would you avoid KL to only.shift into an oncoming closer vehicle colliding with them? There is a ditch to you right. Im braking in my lane or shifting to my right. Confusing right
This post was edited on 10/7/25 at 12:52 pm
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:44 pm to MikeTheTiger71
quote:
The attorney said he was back in his lane 93 yards from the crash site. That’s 279 ft, not 150 feet. And that’s how far he was from where the crash eventually occurred, not from where the cars in the other lane were at the time. The attorney said he traveled another 20 yards between the return to his lane and the time of the crash. That’s another 60 ft. If the cars traveling the other way traveled a similar distance, that puts him more like 330-340 ft in front of oncoming traffic at the time he returned to his lane.
Driving 60 MPH that’s about 2.5 seconds.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:45 pm to ellis197575
Running into the back of someone the vehicle that ran into the back of a vehicle is automatically at fault. Don't think she was thinking about that at the time but I do believe this is La. law.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:46 pm to DustInTheWind
I don’t think anyone has disputed that part. I’m sure I’ve missed comments though.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:47 pm to tiger91
We will never know what would’ve happened at a trial. I think likely it would’ve been somewhere in the middle like it always is.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:51 pm to RB10
quote:
You’re 100% wrong and blinded by LSU homerism. Lacy played a major part in that accident.
I think it is those who rushed to judgment in this case who are blindly clinging to anything to justify themselves and that’s being generous about their motivations.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:52 pm to PurpNGold1985
quote:
Lacy NEVER came to a stop.
He easily had time to stop. Not sure why the above even matters to support your argument.
quote:
He swerves to go around the accident and continues on
Swerve? That implies a sudden evasive turn. He slowed down, almost to a stop. Could have stopped. Should have stopped. But knew that he played some role in what happened. Or at the very least, thought he may be blamed, whether he believed that to be true or not...who knows. He did not want to stick around to deal with something he may be blamed for, so he drove around the wreck and left. There was no "swerving" by Lacy.
This post was edited on 10/7/25 at 12:56 pm
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:54 pm to MikeTheTiger71
quote:
The attorney said he traveled another 20 yards between the return to his lane and the time of the crash
For the love of God. Had KL not been out of his lane, breaking the law, NONE of this would have happened. Who cares when he got back in the lane, he never should have been out of it. The gold truck was not slowing to turn. He was slowing to avoid the green sports car flying toward him. Stop watching his attorneys info and taking it as gospel. He’s a sleeze. Your numbers of feet/yards mean nothing when two entities are traveling towards eachother at a high rate of speed.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:54 pm to sharkfhin
quote:
If you are in the car that swerved shoes. Why would you avoid KL to only.shift into an oncoming closer vehicle colliding with them? There is a ditch to you right. Im braking in my lane or shifting to my right. Confusing right
She swerved to avoid hitting the gold truck she was following too closely at too high a rate of speed while not paying enough attention to brake until it was too late.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:55 pm to SUB
The wreck was directly in the center line of a 2 lane highway. He HAD to swerve to avoid the cars. Idc if he was going 10 mph, he had to change his course to go around and AGAIN enter the oncoming lane.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:56 pm to MikeTheTiger71
quote:
I think it is those who rushed to judgment in this case who are blindly clinging to anything to justify themselves and that’s being generous about their motivations.
Right. You are one of the few not using selective info to back your own preconceived notions. "Wink wink".
Just FYI, today is the first time I've posted about the situation because I knew it would be muddy. Especially his lawyer's press release.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:59 pm to MikeTheTiger71
quote:so while swerving to avoid gold truck she didnt see the oncoming suv she hit? What was her motive then? If I understand correctly if a gold truck was in front of her how could she even see KL oncoming in her lane? Where can I see this?
She swerved to avoid hitting the gold truck she was following too closely at too high a rate of speed while not paying enough attention to brake until it was too late.
This post was edited on 10/7/25 at 1:00 pm
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:59 pm to PurpNGold1985
quote:
The wreck was directly in the center line of a 2 lane highway. He HAD to swerve to avoid the cars. Idc if he was going 10 mph, he had to change his course to go around and AGAIN enter the oncoming lane.
He did not HAVE to swerve. He had time to stop and nearly did. The only reason he didn't was because he chose to leave the scene.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:00 pm to RB10
So what happens now? Does Mr. Hall's family not get any justice either from KL's insurance or Funion girl?
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:00 pm to RB10
quote:
Right. You are one of the few not using selective info to back your own preconceived notions. "Wink wink".
You are being selective in what portions of my comments you are choosing to emphasize. My arguments here are not against those who believe Lacy bears some responsibility for the accident. It’s against those still calling Lacy names and suggesting he was entirely to blame and/or deserving of criminal charges.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:02 pm to MikeTheTiger71
quote:
You are being selective in what portions of my comments you are choosing to emphasize. My arguments here are not against those who believe Lacy bears some responsibility for the accident. It’s against those still calling Lacy names and suggesting he was entirely to blame and/or deserving of criminal charges.
He caused an accident. He was absolutely deserving of criminal charges.
You people need to join the rest of us in reality where criminal actions that lead to a death typically come with consequences.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:02 pm to SUB
quote:
He easily had time to stop. Not sure why the above even matters to support your argument.
The attorney lied. He could have just as easy not passed 4 cars.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:03 pm to SUB
Your not seeing his green car, right at the beginning in the video you posted , switch back into his lane. The video is deceptive and you think he is in his right lane that whole time, he isnt. He is switching lanes while slowing down. For a better view watch LSP video. Because I saw both , I can go back and clearly see KL switching lanes in your video while he is slowing down.
This post was edited on 10/7/25 at 1:07 pm
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:04 pm to zuluboudreaux
2 things can be true. Lacy was driving recklessly and he was not directly responsible for the crash.
Page 18 of 60
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News