re: LSP release Lacy info in reference to Lacy attorney misinformation

Lacy was culpable, and he knew it.

quote:

---

There’s no clear corruption in my opinion from the police.

---

Yes there is. This is the official police report and police statement

quote:

---

2017 Kia Cadenza whose driver swerved left to avoid oncoming dodge charger”

---

Thats a bold faced lie and clearly intentional based on the officer interview

I’ve explained all this long before the video this morning.

Today my best calculation of kyren passing vehicles had him at 72.5 mph.

It’s a citation or jail (like 110 in a 60) or if they upgrade it they can charge with reckless endangerment which they have the discretion to book you

Ahhhh well my naked eye of my accessment of the his speed in the LSP video is close to yours

I can tell anyone here that at 65mph being 3.5 seconds behind another car is about 350ft. I can prove that with radar. 3.5 second behind someone as a reference IS not far tbw and can run right up on someone and hit them from behind quickly. My point is 350ft is not far at all.

But in this case, if we are talking about speeding and 93 yards and 72 yards like the attorney was saying, KL was closing in and very close meaning to me he was probably in the left lane(passing) probably around 150 yards(thats like about 5.2 sec away) away roughly, I can see where another car that had KL bearing down on them(being close) would make a snap reaction to swerve possibly. Jmo.

quote:

---

The gold truck and lacy were able to come to a complete stop without any problems

---

Lacy NEVER came to a stop. Watch the videos. He swerves to go around the accident and continues on. Atleast know the correct sequence of events before you go spewing your support for something that you made up in your head. It’s in 4K.

quote:

---

“One who suddenly finds himself in a position of imminent peril, without sufficient time to consider and weigh all the circumstances or best means that may be adopted to avoid an impending danger, is not guilty of negligence if he fails to adopt what subsequently and upon reflection may appear to have been a better method, unless the emergency in which he finds himself is brought about by his own negligence.”

---

The problem here is that the lady WAS negligent. The imminent peril was directly caused by her inattentiveness, following too closely, and driving too fast, all of which were negligence on her part.

quote:

---

The only reasonable explanation for the vehicle to collide with another vehicle in the opposite lane is that they were trying to avoid Lacy’s car.

I get that it’s circumstantial because there’s isn’t a video of the actual wreck but I don’t think it’s crazy to assume it was Lacy’s fault.

These are always the toughest cases when their is no “smoking gun” and it’’s circumstantial.

---

This is what’s called “reasonable doubt”.

quote:

---

In a civil lawsuit, he may have been assigned some small fraction of fault for the accident, but the majority would have been assigned to her. He committed an infraction for which he should have been cited, but the criminal charges brought against him are an extreme overreach. The vitriol still being directed at Lacy in this thread is way beyond what is reasonable for what he actually did. He did not deserve to have his life turned upside down because of this.

---

You’re 100% wrong and blinded by LSU homerism.

Lacy played a major part in that accident.

Correct

People are trying to understand where exactly KL was in relation to the accident. This is what has been manipulated by KL's attorney.

Was he close enough to cause this accident or not is the question. Attorney video shows that doubt, LSP has a bigger picture and proves he was at the very least negligent in his actions and may or may not bear full responsibility in the end.