- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge Rules In Favor Of Athletes In LSU-SEC Eligibility Battle...Live Updates Inside
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:16 am to UnsureTiger
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:16 am to UnsureTiger
quote:
Jason Williams is the first to speak. Saying that the situations of all parties are not the same and cases shouldn't be combined.
This is something I've been thinking about but we'll see
3
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:18 am to JayVegas702
Leading with his strongest argument.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:19 am to JayVegas702
So they are angling at not fighting all the 5 for 5's that get an injunction. Just the SEC ones
Which leads to saying we can have our own rules
Which leads to saying we can have our own rules
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 11:20 am
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:19 am to JayVegas702
Sec is willing to proceed only on the seven with sec interest but not other parties
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:21 am to UnsureTiger
This is the exact argument. Not being equally applied.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:21 am to UnsureTiger
quote:valid. Why the freak are there non SEC players in the same TRO?
Jason Williams is the first to speak. Saying that the situations of all parties are not the same and cases shouldn't be combined.
SEC should not have to litigate with parties who never participated in sec
That's enough to delay this
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:21 am to UnsureTiger
quote:
Jason Williams is the first to speak. Saying that the situations of all parties are not the same and cases shouldn't be combined.
SEC should not have to litigate with parties who never participated in sec
Coming right out and saying what everyone already knows.....this entire stunt is purely about LSU football. The SEC doesn't give two shits about the other players.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:21 am to UnsureTiger
Unsure is goated, everyone else is updating at breaks.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:21 am to UnsureTiger
quote:
Jason Williams is the first to speak. Saying that the situations of all parties are not the same and cases shouldn't be combined.
Dumb argument. SEC stuck their nose in this court case with the NCAA.
The judge doesn’t have to throw everything out just because some players aren’t in the SEC.
Totally irrelevant. In fact they are making it easier on the sec by not having to fight 30 different cases.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:22 am to Knuckle Checker
To be fair it’s a great point lol.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:22 am to UnsureTiger
“Sec interest”
Does that mean players that are trying to play in the sec or have already played in the sec?
Does that mean players that are trying to play in the sec or have already played in the sec?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:23 am to Giantkiller
quote:
Is the judge a left-leaning type? If so, I don't like our chances.
Yes, WIll Jordon is a Democrat, but don't forget that most of the plaintiffs are black.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:23 am to SportTiger1
quote:
valid. Why the freak are there non SEC players in the same TRO?
It’s not valid.
If they are eligible to talk to any college the sec is restricting their ability to do that. Where they played previously is irrelevant.
How do we know they won’t get sec interest if they are cleared. Or if the sec wouldn’t have threatened every team.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:23 am to Knuckle Checker
this is way too complicated to be resolved today
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:23 am to 1999
That's a softball arse for sure
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:24 am to nicholastiger
quote:
this is way too complicated to be resolved today
This is about an injunction, not the case as a whole.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 11:24 am
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:24 am to nicholastiger
quote:
this is way too complicated to be resolved today
Probably for your dumbass
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:25 am to nicholastiger
quote:
this is way too complicated to be resolved today
quote:
nicholastiger
Some people are able to think critically and reach conclusions on complex issues. You've already demonstrated time and time again that you are not one of those people.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:25 am to Schmelly
it is, with the financial consequences for LSU the SEC is ready to hand down
you ready to suit up a few players which might mean 2/3 wins over a 100 year relationship with the SEC
you ready to suit up a few players which might mean 2/3 wins over a 100 year relationship with the SEC
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 11:26 am
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:26 am to Knuckle Checker
Because restraining orders don't get granted because of some 'it could happen' situation.
There has to be some type relationship already established.
There has to be some type relationship already established.
Page 3 of 100
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News