- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jerry Sullivan on why Ensminger went max protect instead of spreading it out
Posted on 1/10/19 at 1:37 pm to TrevRollings29
Posted on 1/10/19 at 1:37 pm to TrevRollings29
Good riddance.
Clemson and bama say hello. They change and adapt.
Clemson and bama say hello. They change and adapt.
0
Posted on 1/10/19 at 1:40 pm to bencoleman
quote:
Quick while you have all of this football knowledge run down to the football operations building and tell them this hot take so they can implement the slackster offense over the offseason. You need to tell them now so they will have time.
It's not a "hot take." It's this scheme that allows 95% of high school teams and 50% of college football teams punch way above their class. The spread offense was literally designed to negate disparity in physicality between two football teams.
Smaller schools know that they can't line up with Alabama or LSU or Georgia hat on a hat and have a chance. So, instead, they spread the field, get the ball out quick, and try to scheme around the fact that the other team is more physical and talented than they are.
For as much as some people here like to talk about the talent disparity in the trenches between LSU and Alabama, y'all sure are quick to defend an offense that requires our OL to consistently beat their DL for our offense to have success.
This post was edited on 1/10/19 at 1:42 pm
Posted on 1/10/19 at 1:41 pm to UpToPar
quote:
It's not a "hot take." It's this scheme that allows 95% of high school teams and 50% of college football teams punch way above their class. The spread offense was literally designed to negate disparity in physicality between two football teams.
Smaller schools know that they can't line up with Alabama or LSU or Georgia hat on a hat and have a chance. So, instead, they spread the field, get the ball out quick, and try to scheme around the fact that the other team is more physical and talented than they are.
For as much as some people here like to talk about the talent disparity in the trenches between LSU and Alabama, y'all sure are quick to defend an offense that requires our OL to beat their DL.
Posted on 1/10/19 at 1:41 pm to UpToPar
quote:
y'all sure are quick to defend an offense that requires our OL to beat their DL.
Who is defending?
It needs to improve
Posted on 1/10/19 at 1:42 pm to UpToPar
Only a complete 90 year old dumbass would defend this scheme!
Posted on 1/10/19 at 1:42 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:
TheCaterpillar
Posted on 1/10/19 at 1:42 pm to RogerTheShrubber
That comment wasn't directed to you. I've seen you post several times that you think the offense needs to improve.
Posted on 1/10/19 at 1:42 pm to UpToPar
quote:
For as much as some people here like to talk about the talent disparity in the trenches between LSU and Alabama, y'all sure are quick to defend an offense that requires our OL to beat their DL.
It's laughable!
But how dare you question this staff
Posted on 1/10/19 at 1:43 pm to 225Tyga
Take your own advice bub
Posted on 1/10/19 at 1:44 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:
TheCaterpillar
Dont feed the trolls
Posted on 1/10/19 at 1:46 pm to BayouCowboy
quote:
I think the OP was a distortion of what Sullivan said, but I do agree with your assessment.
Not sure how one could distort him literally saying 5 going out for passes is good, but not good for play action they wanted play action
Which if you watched any games... I think I'm not the first to notice excessive play action.
Posted on 1/10/19 at 1:48 pm to TrevRollings29
quote:
Which if you watched any games... I think I'm not the first to notice excessive play action.
Which is completely futile if you can't establish a running game first, like against Alabama.
That game was hard to watch. Long developing play action plays that let them eat us alive. They teed off on Brennan the whole night.
Posted on 1/10/19 at 1:52 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:
Which is completely futile if you can't establish a running game first
Fail...wow
Posted on 1/10/19 at 1:54 pm to 225Tyga
quote:
Fail...wow
You think a defense actually respecting your running game is not important for play-action to work most effectively?
Do tell...
Posted on 1/10/19 at 1:58 pm to 225Tyga
quote:
225Tyga
You are a tard.
Posted on 1/10/19 at 1:58 pm to BigBrod81
quote:
You are right
FIFY
Posted on 1/10/19 at 2:11 pm to 225Tyga
Posted on 1/10/19 at 2:27 pm to 225Tyga
quote:
Fail...wow
Fail...wow
Posted on 1/10/19 at 2:30 pm to TrevRollings29
That’s not what they do at Clemson.
Posted on 1/10/19 at 2:31 pm to TrevRollings29
Sounds like Les
Page 10 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News