- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is Reeves Really Our Best Option in LF?
Posted on 5/6/26 at 5:58 pm to ProjectP2294
Posted on 5/6/26 at 5:58 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
ETA: and the arguing about it has been dumb anyway.
But it's what we do here, man
Posted on 5/6/26 at 6:29 pm to TigahFan85
quote:
do like that Jay is giving younger guys chances to prove themselves for next year
Reeves is a senior. He’s out of eligibility after this season. I do rather see Yamin though.
Posted on 5/7/26 at 6:56 am to TigahFan85
quote:
If he scored two runs and he hit another runner in (RBI) that means he accounted for 3 total runs scored.
You are missing his point.Each run is batted in as well as scored. If you are going to give a player credit for his runs scored and his RBIs, then you have to double the runs scored before you divide them into his total in order to get his contribution.
We had guys saying that Reeves had 2 runs scored and one batted in, therefore he accounted for about ten percent of the 33 runs scored. But that’s faulty. The equation should be three divide by 66.
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:08 am to GeauxTime9
quote:
I trust Jay has seen enough behind the scenes to know what he has in each player and he’s putting his best 9 on the field.
Yorke has entered the chat
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:49 am to mdomingue
quote:
RP = 1(rbi) + 1(run scored) - 1 (home run)
I know this isn't your formula. But this is such an antiquated way of thinking. If you are counting things like that, an HR should count twice. Or more simply, an RBI and run should each be .5.
Think of this scenario.
Runners at first and third. Batter A hits a grounder to SS. Run scores, fielder's choice at 2nd. Batter A gets a RBI. Batter B comes up and cranks a 2 run homer.
Batter A = 2 RP = 1 run + 1 rbi
Batter B = 2 RP = 1 run + 1 rbi - 1 HR
The fielder's choice results in an out and only gets you a run b/c there happened to be someone on 3rd. The home run results in no outs and 2 runs. The batters are credited with the same amount of RC. I don't think anyone would argue those at-bats are equal, yet they are valued the same in that formula.
Posted on 5/7/26 at 8:59 am to TigahFan85
Reeves family must be very good supporters
Posted on 5/7/26 at 9:07 am to notbilly
quote:
Batter A hits a grounder to SS. Run scores, fielder's choice at 2nd. Batter A gets a RBI
Batter A = 2 RP = 1 run + 1 rbi
This is flawed because Batter A will not count as a Run it is only scored as an RBI, as to Batter A did not score in this scenario.
So, for your scenario for Batter A his RP is only 1 because of the RBI
The only time a batter will get a Run and RBI at the same at bat is when that batter hits a home run.
This post was edited on 5/7/26 at 9:08 am
Posted on 5/7/26 at 9:50 am to TigahFan85
quote:
This is flawed because Batter A will not count as a Run it is only scored as an RBI, as to Batter A did not score in this scenario.
So, for your scenario for Batter A his RP is only 1 because of the RBI
The only time a batter will get a Run and RBI at the same at bat is when that batter hits a home run.
You kinda missed a couple of key points there.
1) My scenario had the next batter hitting a 2 run HR. So "Batter A" could score on the next pitch. 1 rbi, 1 run
2) The old formula that people are using in this thread punishes a batter for a home run. The formula is:
RP (Runs Produced) = Runs + RBI - HRs
The purpose is not to give a batter 2 credits for a home run. I pointed out a flaw in it b/c someone could have a less productive AB and get the same credit as someone with a much better AB. To be fair, all formulas like this will have some flaws.
Posted on 5/7/26 at 9:56 am to notbilly
quote:
. I pointed out a flaw in it b/c someone could have a less productive AB and get the same credit as someone with a much better AB.
That's covered in other stats though. This isn't meant to be a silver bullet stat that tells the relative value of everything. It's just a counting stat to say how many runs you've contributed to.
Popular
Back to top


0





