- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I'm not as pessimistic as others, there are reasons why you wouldn't pitch Skenes today..
Posted on 6/3/23 at 1:54 pm to LSBoosie
Posted on 6/3/23 at 1:54 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
You want your best pitcher going against the better teams. I really don’t understand how that concept is so hard to grasp for some people.
You folks will still claim victory if LSU sweeps this thing.
0
Posted on 6/3/23 at 1:58 pm to MT555
quote:
Regardless if it works or not it isn’t the right call.
Then why are we even paying coaches?
Posted on 6/3/23 at 2:30 pm to gabzooks
quote:
Objectively looking at game 1, skenes was your best option
And he pitched and we won.
quote:
Objectively looking at game 2, skenes is your best option,
Uhhhh that’s false. He pitched already.
Posted on 6/3/23 at 2:49 pm to moneyg
quote:
You can’t see the forest through the trees.
You can't read.
I have stated many times, including in this thread, that I would have pitched Skenes today.
But I also don't assume I know better than our very successful head coach who has more knowledge, information, and resources than I do to make the most informed decision. That's what you are doing and it continues to be hilarious every time I read the same damn thing...which has been repeated for over 24 hours now by countless posters here.
Posted on 6/3/23 at 2:53 pm to subotic
quote:
That's what you are doing and it continues to be hilarious every time I read the same damn thing...which has been repeated for over 24 hours now by countless posters here.
They confuse having a right to question decisions with thinking they are always right. It’s baffling, and like you said, hilarious.
Posted on 6/3/23 at 3:02 pm to MikeTheTiger71
quote:
I would not consider 3-0 de facto proof of the soundness of the approach.
It would seem to indicate he put his team in a great position to advance and continue our starters' normal routine.
But I guess that wouldn't be sound enough.
Posted on 6/3/23 at 4:14 pm to moneyg
quote:
Do you really think that Floyd is a better matchup than Skenes? Do you think pointing to a single outcome necessarily changes a future event?
OHH SO TULANE WAS A DIFFERENT TEAM THAN WHEN LSU DRUMMED THEM!!! Thank you for making my point.
It is ALWAYS about match-ups. None of you on here has done the research that this staff has done for this ENTIRE TOURNAMENT. It ISNT ABOUT ONE GAME AS YOU STATED.
Posted on 6/3/23 at 5:19 pm to Tiger1988
quote:
OHH SO TULANE WAS A DIFFERENT TEAM THAN WHEN LSU DRUMMED THEM!!! Thank you for making my point.
It is ALWAYS about match-ups. None of you on here has done the research that this staff has done for this ENTIRE TOURNAMENT. It ISNT ABOUT ONE GAME AS YOU STATED.
This is what happens when you decide to explain the unexplainable. You end up suggesting that the guy with the better fastball, the better slider, the better change up and the better control isn’t the better matchup.
Posted on 6/3/23 at 10:58 pm to subotic
quote:
It would seem to indicate he put his team in a great position to advance and continue our starters' normal routine.
It would indicate that his choices didn’t cost the team. If there are multiple ways to accomplish the same goal, especially when there is randomness involved, actual achievement of the goal does not tell us which way was the best.
Page 7 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News