- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I'll get down voted, but what is so wrong with our freshman having "swag"
Posted on 9/10/14 at 9:05 pm to LSUvegasbombed
Posted on 9/10/14 at 9:05 pm to LSUvegasbombed
Swag is fine but the minute they pull a "swag" pose while we're losing they need their arse busted.
Posted on 9/10/14 at 9:07 pm to LSUvegasbombed
I find 15 yard penalties to be annoying.
Isn't this subject dead and beaten to death? He apologized to the team already. It's over.
Isn't this subject dead and beaten to death? He apologized to the team already. It's over.
Posted on 9/10/14 at 9:17 pm to LSUvegasbombed
Wasn't aware that their swag was viewed as "so wrong"
If we are taking about LF's pose, that's not swag.
If we are taking about LF's pose, that's not swag.
Posted on 9/10/14 at 9:35 pm to StreakySchmidty
I hate the word "swag"
but the last two years we were definitely missing it after the 2011 season
so glad to see some confidence/cokiness floating around again
don't care
but the last two years we were definitely missing it after the 2011 season
so glad to see some confidence/cokiness floating around again
don't care
Posted on 9/10/14 at 9:39 pm to Delacroix22
It was embarrassing. As soon as he did I just shook my head. I hope he backs that dumb shite up from this point forward.
Posted on 9/10/14 at 9:40 pm to OGTiger
My first touchdown on Varsity, I went insane. Couldn't stop smiling the rest of the night. It was so surreal I don't remember what I did. Just got a penalty. Lol. People just don't get it
Posted on 9/10/14 at 9:41 pm to LSUvegasbombed
quote:
so wrong with our freshman having "swag"
Save it for a worthy opponent. You don't get a lot of respect for your "swag" vs SHSU
Posted on 9/10/14 at 9:42 pm to mattytiger123
he told Hilliard he was going to do it before the score
Posted on 9/10/14 at 9:54 pm to LSUvegasbombed
nothign at all wrong with swag...just gotta do something to earn it...
Posted on 9/10/14 at 10:07 pm to LSUvegasbombed
If you have to ask that question ..... then I question a lot of things about you.
But, everyone grows up with time.
But, everyone grows up with time.
Posted on 9/10/14 at 11:27 pm to munchman
"Swag"
Secretly
We
Are
Gay
Secretly
We
Are
Gay
Posted on 9/10/14 at 11:38 pm to LSUvegasbombed
I'm going to beat this already pulverized horse to dust by adding that I understand "swag" is shorter than "swagger", and helps keep the thesis short. But, frankly, I don't think it's worth it.
These players have sincere swagger, and I believe truncating the final three letters effectively castrates the term, it's worse than "swagga". At least that term maintains the general form; exchanging a syllable is preferable to killing it.
On top of that, there's exists a namespace collision with the noun form of "swag". It's more or less synonymous with "lagniappe", sometimes used in reference to objects you might acquire at an entertainment transaction. Personally, I would steer of clear that of ambiguity, by using the already existing word which specifically describes the characteristic to which you refer. There's both nouns, and they're applicable in some overlapping situations, however they describe weakly associated but fundamentally direction things: on is a collection of physical and non-corporal (but discreet and well-defined instances), while the other is the nebulous confluence of confidence, exuberance, arrogance and style. But that's your choice: only you (or an admin) can change it.
Also, I disagree with the omission of the "?" sentence terminator. Because I'm not utterly retarded, I understood that you're asking a question and understood the line inquiry. To summarize, the subject's structural quality reminds of the 2011 season: it was solid from the beginning and fantastic most of the way through, but ended badly.
Moving on to your answer, I agree.
These players have sincere swagger, and I believe truncating the final three letters effectively castrates the term, it's worse than "swagga". At least that term maintains the general form; exchanging a syllable is preferable to killing it.
On top of that, there's exists a namespace collision with the noun form of "swag". It's more or less synonymous with "lagniappe", sometimes used in reference to objects you might acquire at an entertainment transaction. Personally, I would steer of clear that of ambiguity, by using the already existing word which specifically describes the characteristic to which you refer. There's both nouns, and they're applicable in some overlapping situations, however they describe weakly associated but fundamentally direction things: on is a collection of physical and non-corporal (but discreet and well-defined instances), while the other is the nebulous confluence of confidence, exuberance, arrogance and style. But that's your choice: only you (or an admin) can change it.
Also, I disagree with the omission of the "?" sentence terminator. Because I'm not utterly retarded, I understood that you're asking a question and understood the line inquiry. To summarize, the subject's structural quality reminds of the 2011 season: it was solid from the beginning and fantastic most of the way through, but ended badly.
Moving on to your answer, I agree.
Posted on 9/11/14 at 5:12 am to LSUvegasbombed
LF addressed this issue with class to the ones who matter the most. He understands the situation and this will not define him at all. However he will prove to the critics over time what character and abilities he has as well as his motivation and dedication to excel in every aspect.
Posted on 9/11/14 at 5:26 am to LSUvegasbombed
It was dumb and uncalled for. To me it would have shown more swag to simply toss the ball to an official rather than striking the pose. Acting like you are the man for scoring against an FCS school is a joke.
Posted on 9/11/14 at 6:04 am to StreakySchmidty
Those days are gone.
Posted on 9/11/14 at 9:05 am to Woodreaux
quote:
I'm going to beat this already pulverized horse to dust by adding that I understand "swag" is shorter than "swagger", and helps keep the thesis short. But, frankly, I don't think it's worth it. These players have sincere swagger, and I believe truncating the final three letters effectively castrates the term, it's worse than "swagga". At least that term maintains the general form; exchanging a syllable is preferable to killing it. On top of that, there's exists a namespace collision with the noun form of "swag". It's more or less synonymous with "lagniappe", sometimes used in reference to objects you might acquire at an entertainment transaction. Personally, I would steer of clear that of ambiguity, by using the already existing word which specifically describes the characteristic to which you refer. There's both nouns, and they're applicable in some overlapping situations, however they describe weakly associated but fundamentally direction things: on is a collection of physical and non-corporal (but discreet and well-defined instances), while the other is the nebulous confluence of confidence, exuberance, arrogance and style. But that's your choice: only you (or an admin) can change it. Also, I disagree with the omission of the "?" sentence terminator. Because I'm not utterly retarded, I understood that you're asking a question and understood the line inquiry. To summarize, the subject's structural quality reminds of the 2011 season: it was solid from the beginning and fantastic most of the way through, but ended badly. Moving on to your answer, I agree.
You sir, are an obvious genius. I cannot rightly comprehend why you would waste your precious time analyzing the dribble put forth on a lowly message board.
Posted on 9/11/14 at 9:12 am to SCwTiger
With all the freshman Les is playing I am glad they have the swag. I think the team i going to surprise some of the people on this rant. Our schedule is brutal, but we will be in the fight!
Posted on 9/11/14 at 9:25 am to 1badboy
most of our fanbase hates swagger
Posted on 9/11/14 at 9:43 am to StreakySchmidty
quote:
We are a team that hasn't proven anything yet
We have proven that we can come back from being down. With no conference games to go on yet, I would say that we have certainly proven as much as we possibly could up to this point.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News